Skip to main content
Log in

Factors controlling the timing of root elongation intensity in a mature upland oak stand

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the timing of root elongation intensity (REI) – the production of newly elongating roots measured in length per unit soil volume per unit time – in a mature white oak-chestnut oak forest in Tennessee, USA, over a 4-year period. We used a network of minirhizotrons to (1) examine environmental control of soil moisture and temperature over REI, (2) evaluate the control of phenology over REI (3) develop a multivariate regression equation using the variables of soil temperature, soil water potential and phenology to predict REI, and (4) delineate soil water potentials that were optimum for growth. Fifteen minirhizotron tubes were installed on the upper slope of an upland oak stand on Walker Branch Watershed in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Measurements of REI were examined over three growing seasons in the upper 30 cm of the soil profile. Composited sets of data on REI, soil water potential, soil temperature and phenology were analyzed to determine the strength of relationships between the latter three variables and REI. There was no statistically significant relationship between REI and soil temperature during the growing season (March–November). The highly significant (p < 0.0001) relationship between soil water potential and REI was best described as log linear, using log10 (-Ψ) vs. log10 (REI). The correlation between a phenology index and REI was also highly significant (p < 0.0001), as the 24 highest REI levels occurred between late April and early August. Whereas soil water potential played a major role in controlling REI, our data indicate that at times phenologically related factors appeared to override environmental variables. The fact that REI generally peaked every year following completion of leaf expansion is congruent with the fixed shoot growth pattern of many temperate-zone deciduous tree species. In an attempt to explain the importance of phenology in controlling REI, we refer to the concept of `phenological programming'. This concept contrasts with more environmentally determinant explanations of the timing of root growth. Those theories cannot explain either our data or that of others, wherein, during late summer and early autumn, REI does not return to early summer rates, even though soil moisture and temperature conditions are equally, if not more, favorable. The particular type of `phenological programming' hypothesized in this study may be limited to mature deciduous trees exhibiting a fixed growth pattern of shoot expansion and growing in a temperate climate with a mid-summer drought period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burke M K and Raynal D J 1995 Fine root growth phenology, production and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant Soil 162, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook E R, Kablack M A and Jacoby G C 1988 The 1986 drought in the southeastern United States: How rare an event was it? J. Geophys. Res. 93, 14257–14260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deans J D 1979 Fluctuations of the soil environment and fine root growth in a young Sitka spruce plantation. Plant Soil 52, 45–51. 212

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWald L E and Feret P P 1987 Changes in loblolly pine root growth potential from September to April. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drungil C E C, Gish T J and Abt K 1987 Soil moisture determination in gravelly soils with time domain reflectometry. Paper No. 87- 2568. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enslin WR, Pregitzer K S and Hendrick R L 1994 MSU ROOTS: A PC-Based Program to Quantify Plant Roots. Center for Remote Sensing, Michigan State Univ., 115 Manly Miles Building, 1405 S. Harrison Rd., East Lansing, MI 48823-5243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey T J and Hughes J W 1994 Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. J. Ecol. 82, 533–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower S T, Isebrands J G and Sheriff D W 1995 Carbon allocation and accumulation in conifers. In Resource Physiology of Conifers: Acquisition, Allocation and Utilization. Eds. WK Smith and TM Hinckley. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson P J, Todd D E, Edwards N T and Huston M A 1995 Field performance of the Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment. InEcosystemManipulation Experiments. Eds. A Jenkins, RC Ferrier and C Kirby. pp 307–313. Ecosystems Research Report no. 20, Commission of the European Communities.

  • Hanson P J, Todd D E, Huston M A, Joslin J D, Croker J L and Auge, R M 1998 Description and field performance of the Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment: 1993- 1996, ORNL/TM-13586, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head G C 1969 The effects of fruiting and defoliation on seasonal trends in new root production on apple trees. J. Hort. Sci. 44, 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head G C 1973 Shedding of roots. In Shedding of Plant Parts. Ed. TT Kozlowski. pp 237–293. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1992 The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73, 1094–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2507–2520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1996 Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J. Ecol. 84, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann R K 1971 Growth and production of tree roots: A review. In The Belowground Ecosystem: A Synthesis of Plant-associated Processes. Ed. KK Marshall. pp 7–28. Range Sci. Dept., Sci. Series No. 26. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E A, Reed D D, Mroz G D, Liechty H O and Cattelino P J 1993 Climate stress as a precursor to forest decline: paper birch in northern Michigan, 1985-1990. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J D 1983 The quantification of fine root turnover in a white oak stand. Ph. D. Diss., Univ. Missouri, Columbia (Diss. Abstr. No. 84D6210).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J D and Henderson G S 1987 Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine root turnover in a white oak stand. For. Sci. 33, 330–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J D and Wolfe M H 1998 Impacts of water input manipulations on fine root production and mortality in a mature hardwood forest. Plant Soil 204, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J D and Wolfe M H 1999 Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data. 1999. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 218–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal P, Guehl J M and Ausenac G 1989 Differential growth response to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment in seedlings of Cedrus atlantica and Pinus nigra ssp. Laaricio var. Corsicana. Can. J. For. Res. 19, 1351–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossuth S V and Ross S D 1987 Hormonal control of tree growth. Plant Growth Regulation 6, 1–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer P J and Kozlowski T T 1979 Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, 1979.

  • Kuhns M R, Garrett H E, Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1985 Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential and leaf water potential. For. Sci. 31, 617-629. Larson M M 1974 Effects of soil moisture on early growth of oak seedlings. For. Res. Rev. Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Cent. 74, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson M M and Whitmore F W 1970 Moisture stress affects root regeneration and early growth of red oak seedlings: Influence of soil temperature. For. Sci. 16, 495–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyr H and Hoffman G 1967 Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots. Int. Rev. Forest. Res. 2, 181–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marloth R H 1950 Citrus growth studies. I. Periodicity of root growth and top growth in nursery seedlings and budlings. J. Hort. Sci. 25, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Mellilo J M 1982 The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63, 1481–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovington J D and Murray G 1968 Seasonal periodicity of root growth of birch trees. In IBP Symposium on Methods of Productivity Studies in Root Systems and Rhizosphere Organisms. Ed. Soviet Nat. Committee for International Biological Program. USSR Acad. Sci., Nauka, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed H S and MacDougal D T 1937 Periodicity in the growth of the orange tree. Growth 1, 371–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich P B, Teskey R O, Johnson P S and Hinckley T M 1980 Periodic root and shoot growth in oak. For. Sci. 26, 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson S D 1958 The effect of IAA on root development of Acer saccharinum L. Physiol. Plant. 11, 698–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers W S 1939 Root studies. VIII. Apple root growth in relation to root-stock, soil seasonal and climatic factors. J. Pomol. Hort. Sci. 17, 99–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers W S and Head G C 1963 Factors affecting the distribution and growth of roots of perennial woody species. Proc. Easter Sch. Agr. Sci., Univ. Nottingham 15, 280–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1989 SAS/STATl' Users Guide, Version 6, 4th Edn. Volumes 1 and 2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 1789 p.

  • Simmons G L and Pope P E 1988 Influence of soil water potential and mycorrhizal colonization on root growth of yellow poplar and sweet gum seedlings grown in compacted soil. Can. J. For. Res. 18, 1392–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword M A, Gravatt D A, Faulkner P L and Chanbers J L 1996 Seasonal branch and fine root growth of juvenile loblolly pine five growing seasons after fertilization. Tree Physiol. 16, 899–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1981 Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiol. Plant. 52, 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topp G C and Davis J L 1985 Measure of soil water content using time domain reflectometry (TDR): A field evaluation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, Boon P, O'Hara J and Asbjornsen H 1996 Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B F and Batchelard E P 1975 Effects of girdling and defoliation on root elongation intensity and survival of Eucalyptus regnans and E. viminalis seedlings. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 2, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joslin, J.D., Wolfe, M.H. & Hanson, P.J. Factors controlling the timing of root elongation intensity in a mature upland oak stand. Plant and Soil 228, 201–212 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004866705021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004866705021

Navigation