Skip to main content
Log in

Rolling in nature and robotics: A review

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a review of recent rolling robots including Rollo from Helsinki University of Technology, Spherical Mobile Robot from the Politecnico of Bari, Sphericle from the University of Pisa, Spherobot from Michigan State University, August from Azad University of Qazvin and the University of Tehran, Deformable Robot from Ritsumeijan University, Kickbot from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Gravitational Wheeled Robot from Kinki University, Gyrover from Carnegie Mellon University, Roball from the Université de Sherbrooke, and Rotundus from the Ångström Space Technology Center.

Seven rolling robot design principles are presented and discussed (Sprung central member, Car driven, Mobile masses, Hemispherical wheels, Gyroscopic stabilisation, Ballast mass — fixed axis, and Ballast mass — moving axis). Robots based on each of the design principles are shown and the performances of the robots are tabulated. An attempt is made to grade the design principles based on their suitability for movement over an unknown and varied but relatively smooth terrain. The result of this comparison suggests that a rolling robot based on a mobile masses principle would be best suited to this specific application.

Some wonderful rolling organisms are introduced and defined as “active” or “passive” depending on whether they generate their own rolling motion or external forces cause their rolling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia-Paris M, Deban S M. A novel antipredator mechanism in salamanders: Rolling escape in hydromantes platycephalus. Journal of Herpetology, 1995, 29, 149–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Henschel J. Feature creature — The golden wheel spider. Gobabeb Times, 2005, 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antol J, Calhoun P, Flick J, Hajos G, Kolacinski R, Minton D, Owens R, Parker J. Low Cost Mars Surface Exploration: The Mars Tumbleweed. NASA Technical Report, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA/TM-2003-212411.

  4. Antol J, Chattin R L, Copeland B M, Krizan S A. The NASA langley mars tumbleweed rover prototype. Proceeding of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2006, AIAA-2006-0064.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Jakubik P, Suomela J, Vainio M, Yilkorpi T, Halme A. ARIADNA AO4532-03/6210, Biologically Inspired Solutions for Robotic Surface Mobility. Helsinki University of Technology — Automation technology laboratory, Helsinki, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brackenbury J. Caterpillar kinematics. Nature, 1997, 390, 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Full R, Earls K, Wong M, Caldwell R. Locomotion like a wheel? Nature, 1993, 365, 495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caldwell R L. A unique form of locomotion in a stomatopod — backward somersaulting. Nature, 1979, 282, 71–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halme A, Schonberg T, Wang Y. Motion control of a spherical mobile robot. 4th IEEE Intemational Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Mie, Japan, 1996, 1, 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reina G, Foglia M, Milella A, Gentile A. Rough-terrain traversability for a cylindrical shaped mobile robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, IEEE, New York, USA, 148–153.

  11. Rover Company Limited. Ball-shaped Robot. St Petersburg Russia, 1996.

  12. Bicchi A, Balluchi A, Prattichizzo D, Gorelli A. Introducing the “SPHERICLE”: An experimental testbed for research and teaching in nonholonomy. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1997, 3, 2620–2625.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjee R, Minor M A, Pukrushpan J T. Simple motion planning strategies for spherobot: A spherical mobile robot. Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 1999, 3, 2132–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Javadi A H A, Mojabi P. Introducing august: A novel strategy for an omnidirectional spherical rolling robot. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, 3527–3533.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sugiyama Y, Hirai S. Crawling and jumping by a deformable robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendal, Japan, 2004, 4, 3276–3281.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Batten C, Wentzlaff D. Kickbot: A Spherical Autonomous Robot. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [2006-3-20], http://www.mit.edu/~cbatten/work/kickbot-embint01.pdf

  17. Kiyoshi Ioi H I, Ayanobu Murakami. Design of a gravitational wheeled robot. Advanced Robotics, 2002, 16, 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown H B Jr, Xu Y. A single-wheel, gyroscopically stabilized robot. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1996, 4, 3658–3663.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michaud F, Laplante J-F, Larouche H, Duquette A, Caron S, Letourneau D, Masson P. Autonomous spherical mobile robot to child development studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2005, 35, 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rotundus Rotundus. Durable mobile robot for outdoor serveillance. Uppsala University, Ångström Space Technology Center, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhodri H. Armour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armour, R.H., Vincent, J.F.V. Rolling in nature and robotics: A review. J Bionic Eng 3, 195–208 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60003-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60003-1

Keywords

Navigation