Skip to main content
Log in

Exploration of expansion patterns and prediction of urban growth for Colombo City, Sri Lanka

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to analyze and simulate urban growth pattern of Colombo city in Sri Lanka which is a dynamic and rapid urbanizing region. The spatiotemporal urban growth patterns during 1997–2019 were first analyzed by comparing Land Cover (LC) maps for time intervals between 1997–2008 and 2008–2019 using intensity and growth pattern analysis. Urban lands in Colombo have grown in a faster rate during 1997–2008 as compared to 2008–2019 period. The prominent spatial expansion pattern during 1997–2008 is outlying, as opposed to edge expansion which is predominant during 2008–2019. These major urban expansion patterns were modeled to predict the future urban structure of Colombo in 2030 using FUTURES (FUTure Urban-Regional Environment Simulation) model. FUTURES is a patch-based, multilevel modeling framework for simulating the emergence of landscape spatial structure in urbanizing regions. Simulated result generated from the model reveals substantial agreement with real ground urban changes showing a kappa value of 0.78. The model allows to predict three different scenarios, namely Business as Usual, Infill Growth and Sprawl showing over 100 km2 increase in urban lands by 2030. Predicted urban structure was then compared with proposed development plan. With certain limitations arising from available data, the model is effective in predicting possible urban scenarios and providing valuable inputs to support better decision making for sustainable development of Colombo city. The results demonstrated in this study would be useful in modelling urban growth in other cities and further validate the efficacy of the proposed workflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peter, E., & Roberts, M. (2016). South Asia development matters. Leveraging urbanization in South Asia: managing spatial transformation for prosperity and livability. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2013). The growth of cities. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (1st ed., pp. 781–853). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rui, Y. (2013). Urban growth modeling based on land-use changes and road network expansion (PhD). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leng, L. W., & Choo, C. S. (2019). Maritime southeast Asia in global trade in pre-modern times: A historical geography perspective. Samudera. Journal of Maritime and Coastal Studies, 1(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakkumbura, M. (2018). Sri Lanka’s maritime affairs in the changing Indian ocean. Retrieved October 11, 2019, from https://lki.lk/blog/sri-lankas-maritime-affairs-in-the-changing-indian-ocean/.

  6. Worldshipping.org. (2019). Top50 world container ports world shipping council. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/global-trade/top-50-world-container-ports/.

  7. Sri Lanka Ports Authority. (2016). Forging ahead. Colombo. Retrieved November 16, 2019, from https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/documents/paperspresented/annual-report-srilanka-ports-authority-2016.pdf.

  8. Aldwaik, S., & Pontius, R. (2012). Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Linard, C., Tatem, A., & Gilbert, M. (2013). Modelling spatial patterns of urban growth in Africa. Applied Geography, 44, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thapa, R., & Murayama, Y. (2012). Scenario based urban growth allocation in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1–2), 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietzel, C., Oguz, H., Hemphill, J., Clarke, K., & Gazulis, N. (2005). Diffusion and coalescence of the Houston Metropolitan Area: Evidence supporting a new urban theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, X., Li, X., Chen, Y., Tan, Z., Li, S., & Ai, B. (2010). A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecology, 25(5), 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin, J., & Lee, H. (2017). Understanding residential location choices: An application of the UrbanSim residential location model on Suwon. Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2017.1336469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Berkel, D., Shashidharan, A., Mordecai, R., Vatsavai, R., Petrasova, A., Petras, V., et al. (2019). Projecting urbanization and landscape change at large scale using the FUTURES model. Land, 8(10), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8100144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahaman, S., Aruchamy, S., Balasubramani, K., & Jegankumar, R. (2017). Land use/land cover changes in semi-arid mountain landscape in Southern India: A geoinformatics based Markov chain approach. ISPRS - International Archives of The Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-1/W1, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-1-w1-231-2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meentemeyer, R., Tang, W., Dorning, M., Vogler, J., Cunniffe, N., & Shoemaker, D. (2013). FUTURES: Multilevel simulations of emerging urban-rural landscape structure using a stochastic patch-growing algorithm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 785–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorning, M., Koch, J., Shoemaker, D., & Meentemeyer, R. (2015). Simulating urbanization scenarios reveals tradeoffs between conservation planning strategies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoemaker, D., BenDor, T., & Meentemeyer, R. (2019). Anticipating trade-offs between urban patterns and ecosystem service production: Scenario analyses of sprawl alternatives for a rapidly urbanizing region. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 74, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Serasinghe Pathiranage, I., Kantakumar, L., & Sundaramoorthy, S. (2018). Remote sensing data and SLEUTH urban growth model: As decision support tools for urban planning. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0946-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Subasinghe, S., Estoque, R., & Murayama, Y. (2016). Spatiotemporal analysis of urban growth using GIS and remote sensing: A case study of the Colombo Metropolitan Area, Sri Lanka. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(11), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5110197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thanh Noi, P., & Kappas, M. (2017). Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 18(1), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2016). Overcoming challenges faced by local governments in creating a resilient built environment in cities. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 25(5), 628–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Angel, S., Parent, J., & Civco, D. (2012). The fragmentation of urban landscapes: Global evidence of a key attribute of the spatial structure of cities, 1990–2000. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247811433536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrasova, A., Petras, V., Van Berkel, D., Harmon, B., Mitasova, H., & Meentemeyer, R. (2016). Open source approach to urban growth simulation. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B7, 953–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pontius, R. (2004). Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66(8), 1011–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pontius, R., & Millones, M. (2011). Death to Kappa: Birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.552923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express our gratitude to Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for providing required data for this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This research was mainly prepared and conducted by Pavithra Jayasinghe and Venkatesh Raghavan. Pavithra Jayasinghe and Venkatesh Raghavan contributed with ideas and designing the data processing workflow. Go Yonezawa provided valuable inputs about data processing methodology and revising of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavithra Jayasinghe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayasinghe, P., Raghavan, V. & Yonezawa, G. Exploration of expansion patterns and prediction of urban growth for Colombo City, Sri Lanka. Spat. Inf. Res. 29, 465–478 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00364-4

Keywords

Navigation