Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The German energy transition (“Energiewende”), i.e., shifting the basis of the energy system from fossil and nuclear fuels to renewable energy constitutes a policy-driven structural change of the energy systems. The fundamental political decisions on nuclear phase-out and the deep decarbonisation of the energy system were based on specific risk considerations in German society, formed by political and learning processes over more than two decades, including the experiences made with the roll-out of renewable energies from 1990 to 2010 that created significant technology optimism in this field. The major challenges for the energy transition do not arise from technological issues or the system costs of a renewables-based system if the once-only investments in innovation are taken into account (that contributed significantly to the massive cost decrease of wind and solar energy at global level). Structural challenges arise first from the dominance of variable renewable energies, which changes generation patterns and shifts cost structures to high shares of capital and low or even zero marginal costs. This triggers the need for restructured power market design that enables price-based system coordination as well as the payback of investments in a low marginal cost environment and re-adjusts the cost allocation among the different consumer groups. Second, the increasing diversity in the power system brings in a broad range of new players and new economic appraisals (self-generation, etc.) that also requires—beyond new dimensions of coordination—structural changes in the regulatory framework. Third, the spatial patterns of the electricity system necessitate large-scale structural changes in the network infrastructures, which demand a sensitive reflection of public acceptance and network regulation approaches. A successful energy transition beyond its present stage requires stringent and holistic policy approaches that are based on four pillars: paving the way for clean energy, designing the exit game for the high-carbon assets, triggering the network infrastructures and making innovation work in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Sources: Matthes (2000), updated by the author

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s own calculations based on historical data from German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi 2016)

Fig. 3

Sources: Author’s own calculations, based on data from the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (Entso-E) and the European Energy Exchange (EEX)

Fig. 4

Sources: EEX, EPEX, APX, UKPX, Nord Pool, GME, OMEL, TGE, ECB, author’s calculations

Fig. 5

Sources: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (AGEB), Umweltbundesamt (UBA), author’s own calculations

Fig. 6

Source: trend:research and Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (2013); trend:research (2014)

Fig. 7

Source: Author’s own representation

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some voting results in the German Federal Parliament might underline this balance: In the voting on the first formal nuclear phase-out legislation on 14th December 2001 the anti-nuclear motion received 345 votes and the pro-nuclear 324. In the voting for expanding the nuclear lifetime on 28th October 2010 the anti-nuclear motion received 280 votes and the pro-nuclear 309 (with two abstentions). In the voting on the return to an accelerated phase-out legislation after the Fukushima disaster the anti-nuclear motion received 513 votes on 30th June 2011, the pro-nuclear motion and abstentions accounted for only 79 and 8 votes respectively.

  2. See Matthes (2015) for a comprehensive list of the analytical work on energy transition and its implementation in Germany.

  3. See BMWi (2015a and 2016) for further details on the historical trends and Öko-Institut and Fraunhofer ISI (2015) for further details on projections.

  4. See http://www.netzentwicklungsplan.de/en for further details, documents, maps and data.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the organizers of the Fourth International Symposium on Human Survivability at Kyoto University who sparked the work on a comprehensive overview of the energy transition in Germany and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions which helped to improve the quality of the paper. The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful editorial assistance of Vanessa Cook on the draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Christian Matthes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists with regard to this article.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthes, F.C. Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 14, 141–169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-016-0066-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-016-0066-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation