Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease. Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation have been compared in chronic hemodialysis patients, the results are unclear.
Methods
The study population consisted of chronic hemodialysis patients (dialysis duration >6 months) with coronary artery disease who underwent DES implantation or CABG at the Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between January 1, 2003, and February 28, 2006. We followed them until December, 2012. The mean follow-up was 50.91 ± 31.86 months for DES patients and 50.63 ± 36.43 months for CABG patients. Primary end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE). Propensity-score matching was used to reduce selection bias and variable characteristics.
Results
Of 87 chronic hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease, 44 underwent DES implantation and 43 underwent CABG surgery. Multivessel disease patients were 70.45 % in the DES group and 95.35 % in the CABG group. After propensity score adjustment, the MACCE-free survival was significantly higher in the CABG group than in the DES group (HR 3.265; 95 % CI 1.357–7.858; p = 0.008), but overall survival did not differ between the groups (HR 0.968; 95 % CI 0.267–3.507; p = 0.960).
Conclusion
We found that, compared with DES, CABG showed significantly better MACCE-free survival in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Institues of Health (2000) USRDS 2000 Annual Data Report. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. pp 589–684
SoS Investigators et al (2002) Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360(9338):965–970
Mercado N, Wijns W, Serruys PW et al (2005) One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130(2):512–519
Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J et al (2001) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME). J Am Coll Cardiol 38(1):143–149
Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G et al (2005) Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 352(21):2174–2183
Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Lauer MS (2004) Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation 109(19):2290–2295
Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G et al (2008) Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 358(4):331–341
Li Y, Zheng Z, Xu B et al (2009) Comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary disease: three-year follow-up results from a single institution. Circulation 119(15):2040–2050
Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW et al (2008) Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 117(16):2079–2086
Rodriguez AE, Maree AO, Mieres J et al (2007) Late loss of early benefit from drug-eluting stents when compared with bare-metal stents and coronary artery bypass surgery: 3 years follow-up of the ERACI III registry. Eur Heart J 28(17):2118–2125
Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360(10):961–972
Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice MC et al (2013) Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43(5):1006–1013
Manabe S, Shimokawa T, Fukui T et al (2009) Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome? J Card Surg 24(3):234–239
Sunagawa G, Komiya T, Tamura N, Sakaguchi G, Kobayashi T, Murashita T (2010) Coronary artery bypass surgery is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 89(6):1896–1900 (discussion 1900)
Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of C, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31(20):2501–2555
Lauer MS, Blackstone EH, Young JB, Topol EJ (1999) Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol 34(3):618–620
Terazawa S, Tajima K, Takami Y et al (2012) Early and late outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for dialysis patients. J Card Surg 27(3):281–287
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Baxter.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baek, C.H., Kim, SO., Park, SJ. et al. Propensity-matched comparison of drug-eluting stent implantation and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol 27, 87–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-013-0023-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-013-0023-2