Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation of cutting parameters in machining of 100Cr6 with tangential turn-milling method

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The turn-milling methods for machining operation have been developed to increase efficiency of conventional machines recently. These methods are used especially by coupling some apparatuses on the computer numerical control (CNC) machine to decrease the production time and machine costs, ensure the maximum production and increase the quality of machining. In this study, 100Cr6 bearing steel extensively used in industry has been machined by tangential turn-milling method. This paper presents an approach for optimization of the effects of the cutting parameters including cutter speed, workpiece speed, axial feed rate, and depth of cut on the surface roughness in the machining of 100Cr6 steel with tangential turn-milling method by using genetic algorithm (GA). Tangential turning-milling method has been determined to have optimum effects of cutting parameters on the machining of 100Cr6 steel. The experimental results show that the surface roughness quality is close to that of grinding process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kountanya R, Al-Zkeri I, Altan T (2009) Effect of tool edge geometry and cutting conditions on experimental and simulated chip morphology in orthogonal hard turning of 100Cr6 steel. J Mater Process Technol 209:5068–5076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Umbrello D (2011) Influence of material microstructure changes on surface integrity in hard machining of AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(9):887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao C, Zhou Z, Zhang J et al (2011) An experimental investigation of affected layers formed in grinding of AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2011) Magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Savas V, Ozay C (2008) The optimization of the surface roughness in the process of tangential turn-milling using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Savas V, Ozay C (2007) Analysis of the surface roughness of tangential turn-milling for machining with end milling cutter. J Mater Process Technol 186:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savas V, Ozay C (2009) Researching the effects of cutting parameters obtained from MS58 Brass tangential turning-milling processes on surface roughness. Electron J Mach Technol Cover 6(4):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karaguzela U, Bakkal M, Budak E (2012) Process modeling of turn-milling using analytical approach. In: 3rd CIRP conference on process machine interactions (3rd PMI), Procedia CIRP 4:131–139

  9. Mahesh G, Muthu S, Devadasan SR (2015) Prediction of surface roughness of end milling operation using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:369–381

  10. Zhu L, Li H, Wang W (2013) Research on rotary surface topography by orthogonal turn-milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2279–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Budak E, Armarego EJA, Altintas Y (1996) Prediction of milling force coefficients from orthogonal cutting data. J Eng Ind 118(2):216–224

    Google Scholar 

  12. Altintas Y (2012) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design, seconded. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan SM, Zheng WW (2012) The surface roughness modeling on turn-milling process and analysis of influencing factors. Appl Mech Mater 117:1614–1620

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu L, Tang L, Su C et al (2008) Co-simulation of rigid-flexible coupling system for turn-milling center. In: Proceedings of the 7th world congress on intelligent control and automation June 25–27, Chongqing

  15. Tekaüt I, Günay M, Şeker U (2009) Researching the effects of cutting tool vibrations in turning process on surface roughness. In: 5th International advanced technologies symposium, Karabük, pp 1293–1297, Accessed 13–15 May 2009

  16. Quintana G, Ciurana J, Ribatallada J (2010) Surface roughness generation and material removal rate in ball end milling perations. Mater Manuf Process 25(6):386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansour A, Abdalla H (2002) Surface roughness model for end milling: a semi-free cutting carbon casehardening steel (EN 32) in dry condition. J Mater Process Technol 124(1–2):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alauddin M, El Baradie MA, Hashmi MSJ (1997) Prediction of tool life in end milling by response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 71(3):456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang H, Kim J, Kim IH et al (2007) In-process surface roughness prediction using displacement signals from spindle motion. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):1021–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coker SA, Shin YC (1996) In-process control of surface roughness due to tool wear using a new ultrasonic system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(3):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gologlu C, Sakarya N (2008) The effects of cutter path strategies on surface roughness of pocket milling of 1.2738 steel based on Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 206(1–3):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lou SJ, Chen JC (1999) In-process surface roughness recognition (ISRR) system in end-milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(3):200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai Y, Chen JC, Lou S (1999) An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(4):583–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18(5–6):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen JC, Lou MS (2000) Fuzzy-nets based approach using an accelerometer for in-process surface roughness prediction system in milling operations. J Comput Integr Manuf Syst 13(4):358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Firat, 23119, Elazig, Turkey

    Vedat Savas & Cetin Ozay

  2. Ortakoy Vocational High School, University of Aksaray, Aksaray, Turkey

    Hasan Ballikaya

Authors
  1. Vedat Savas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cetin Ozay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hasan Ballikaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedat Savas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savas, V., Ozay, C. & Ballikaya, H. Experimental investigation of cutting parameters in machining of 100Cr6 with tangential turn-milling method. Adv. Manuf. 4, 97–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-016-0134-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-016-0134-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation