Skip to main content
Log in

Different EGFR Gene Mutations in Exon 18, 19 and 21 as Prognostic and Predictive Markers in NSCLC: A Single Institution Analysis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predict longer overall survival (OS) and response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The clinical relevance of different mutations in terms of response to TKIs and prognosis is still unclear.

Objectives

The aims of the present study were to assess the relationship between mutations in exon 18, 19 and 21 in patients treated with TKIs and their clinical outcomes, and evaluate the role of specific point mutations.

Methods

We included in this analysis 55 patients with metastatic NSCLC and mutations in exon 18, 19 and 21, treated in our center between 2004 and 2014. All patients received treatment with TKIs in first and/or subsequent lines. Endpoints analyzed were OS (primary) and time to progression (TTP) (secondary), according to exon mutations and specific point mutations.

Results

A strong negative prognostic association for OS (p = 0.02) and TTP (p = 0.03) was found for exon 18 mutations compared with exon 19 deletions . A trend toward a longer median OS was observed in exon 19 deletions versus exon 21 point mutations (+6.6 months), although more exon 19-mutated patients had brain metastases at diagnosis. Comparing each mutation, p.E746_A750del and p.E746_T751del of exon 19 and p.L858R mutation of exon 21, a trend toward improved OS in p.E746_A750del was found.

Conclusion

In this analysis, exon 19 deletions were associated with better outcomes, despite a higher percentage of brain metastases in this group. The prognostic relevance of p.E746_A750del requires further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86. doi:10.1002/ijc.29210 (Epub 2014 Oct 9).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen AK, Ouaret D, El Ouadrani K, Petitprez A. Targeting EGFR and VEGF(R) pathway cross-talk in tumor survival and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;131:80–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichtenberger BM, Tan PK, Niederleithner H, Ferrara N, Petzelbauer P, Sibilia M. Autocrine VEGF signaling synergizes with EGFR in tumor cells to promote epithelial cancer development. Cell. 2010;140:268–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr S, Thomson S, Buck E, et al. Bypassing cellular EGF receptor dependence through epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transitions. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25:685–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Paz-Ares L, Soulières D, Melezínek I, Moecks J, Keil L, Mok T, Rosell R, Klughammer B. Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(1–2):51–69. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00991.x (Epub 2009 Dec 8).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from ‘‘never smokers’’ and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13306–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamura K, Okamoto I, Kashii T, Negoro S, Hirashima T, Kudoh S, Ichinose Y, Ebi N, Shibata K, Nishimura T, Katakami N, Sawa T, Shimizu E, Fukuoka J, Satoh T, Fukuoka M, West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group. Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403). Br J Cancer. 2008;98(5):907–14. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604249 (Epub 2008 Feb 19).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshida K, Yatabe Y, Park JY, Shimizu J, Horio Y, Matsuo K, Kosaka T, Mitsudomi T, Hida T. Prospective validation for prediction of gefitinib sensitivity by epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(1):22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S, Hatooka S, Shinoda M, Takahashi T, Yatabe Y. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(11):2513–20 (Epub 2005 Feb 28).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J, Krug LM, Pao W, Rizvi N, Pizzo B, Tyson L, Venkatraman E, Ben-Porat L, Memoli N, Zakowski M, Rusch V, Heelan RT. Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Douillard JY, Nishiwaki Y, Vansteenkiste J, Kudoh S, Rischin D, Eek R, Horai T, Noda K, Takata I, Smit E, Averbuch S, Macleod A, Feyereislova A, Dong RP, Baselga J. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected]. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2237–46 (Epub 2003 May 14).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2004;64(24):8919–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roengvoraphoj M1, Tsongalis GJ, Dragnev KH, Rigas JR. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing and mutation-positive patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39(8):839–50. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.05.001 (Epub 2013 Jun 12).

  15. Beau-Faller M, Prim N, Ruppert AM, Nanni-Metéllus I, Lacave R, Lacroix L, Escande F, Lizard S, Pretet JL, Rouquette I, de Crémoux P, Solassol J, de Fraipont F, Bièche I, Cayre A, Favre-Guillevin E, Tomasini P, Wislez M, Besse B, Legrain M, Voegeli AC, Baudrin L, Morin F, Zalcman G, Quoix E, Blons H, Cadranel J. Rare EGFR exon 18 and exon 20 mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer on 10 117 patients: a multicentre observational study by the French ERMETIC-IFCT network. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(1):126–31. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt418 (Epub 2013 Nov 26).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yasuda H, Park E, Yun CH, et al. Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(216):216ra177.

  17. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, et al. Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3908–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morita S, Okamoto I, Kobayashi K, Yamazaki K, Asahina H, Inoue A, Hagiwara K, Sunaga N, Yanagitani N, Hida T, Yoshida K, Hirashima T, Yasumoto K, Sugio K, Mitsudomi T, Fukuoka M, Nukiwa T. Combined survival analysis of prospective clinical trials of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(13):4493–8. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0391 (Epub 2009 Jun 16).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Riely GJ, Pao W, Pham DK, et al. Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:839–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Sunpaweravong P, Leong SS, Sriuranpong V, Chao TY, Nakagawa K, Chu DT, Saijo N, Duffield EL, Rukazenkov Y, Speake G, Jiang H, Armour AA, To KF, Yang JC, Mok TS. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(21):2866–74. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.4235 (Epub 2011 Jun 13).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cappuzzo F, Ligorio C, Jänne PA, Toschi L, Rossi E, Trisolini R, Paioli D, Holmes AJ, Magrini E, Finocchiaro G, Bartolini S, Cancellieri A, Ciardiello F, Patelli M, Crino L, Varella-Garcia M. Prospective study of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive/phospho-Akt-positive or never smoker patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the ONCOBELL trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2248–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, Ince WL, Jänne PA, Januario T, Johnson DH, Klein P, Miller VA, Ostland MA, Ramies DA, Sebisanovic D, Stinson JA, Zhang YR, Seshagiri S, Hillan KJ. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):5900–9 (Epub 2005 Jul 25).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haserlat SM, Harris PL, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Sgroi DC, Muir B, Riemenschneider MJ, Iacona RB, Krebs AD, Johnson DH, Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, Fukuoka M, Kris MG, Baselga J, Ochs JS, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):8081–92 (Epub 2005 Oct 3).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu JY, Yu CJ, Chang YC, Yang CH, Shih JY, Yang PC. Effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on “uncommon” epidermal growth factor receptor mutations of unknown clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(11):3812–21. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3408 (Epub 2011 Apr 29).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Won YW, Han JY, Lee GK, Park SY, Lim KY, Yoon KA, Yun T, Kim HT, Lee JS. Comparison of clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:947–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):141–51. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8 (Epub 2015 Jan 12).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Joshi M, Rizvi SM, Belani CP. Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2015;7:75–82. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S51808 (Published online 2015 February 19).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cappuzzo F, Ligorio C, Toschi L, Rossi E, Trisolini R, Paioli D, Magrini E, Finocchiaro G, Bartolini S, Cancellieri A, Hirsch FR, Crino L, Varella-Garcia M. EGFR and HER2 gene copy number and response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(5):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chung KP, Wu SG, Wu JY, Yang JC, Yu CJ, Wei PF, Shih JY, Yang PC. Clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancers harboring different exon 19 deletions in EGFR. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(12):3470–7. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2353 (Epub 2012 Apr 17).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma L, Wang DD, Huang Y, Yan H, Wong MP, Lee VH. EGFR Mutant Structural Database: computationally predicted 3D structures and the corresponding binding free energies with gefitinib and erlotinib. BMC Bioinform. 2015;14(16):85. doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0522-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All the authors contributed to the article, without any external involvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Rossi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Sabrina Rossi, Ettore D’Argento, Michele Basso, Antonia Strippoli, Vincenzo Dadduzio, Eleonora Cerchiaro, Maurizio Martini, Alessandra Cassano and Carlo Barone have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Funding

Sabrina Rossi, Ettore D’Argento, Michele Basso, Antonia Strippoli, Vincenzo Dadduzio, Eleonora Cerchiaro, Maurizio Martini, Alessandra Cassano and Carlo Barone have received no funding for the conduct of this study.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study has been conducted in accordance with the rules of the local Ethics Committee and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided a written consent for use of their clinical data; a separate consent for molecular analyses was obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, S., D’Argento, E., Basso, M. et al. Different EGFR Gene Mutations in Exon 18, 19 and 21 as Prognostic and Predictive Markers in NSCLC: A Single Institution Analysis. Mol Diagn Ther 20, 55–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0176-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-015-0176-x

Keywords

Navigation