Abstract
Purpose of Review
Discuss the management of ocular surface disease for favorable outcomes with advanced technology IOLs.
Recent Findings
Ocular surface disease poses a challenge for favorable outcomes with advanced technology IOLs, especially given current patient expectations that glasses-free outcomes are guaranteed. Long-established and recent techniques for optimizing the ocular surface prior to cataract surgery, combined with education and careful selection of IOLs can help meet patient expectations.
Summary
Careful measurement, planning, and treatment of ocular surface disorders can enable more patients to benefit from advanced technology IOLs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
• Patino CM, McKean-Cowdin R, Azen SP, Allison JC, Choudhury F, Varma R, et al. Central and peripheral visual impairment and the risk of falls and falls with injury. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(2):199–206.e1 Patients with presbyopia-correcting IOLs may benefit from both cosmetic and functional improvements with increased safety compared to bifocals, which create peripheral visual distortion, thereby increasing the risk of falls.
Sangwan VS, Gupta S, Das S. Cataract surgery in ocular surface diseases: clinical challenges and outcomes. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(1):81–7.
Kim P, Plugfelder S, Slomovic AR. Top 5 pearls to consider when implanting advanced-technology IOLs in patients with ocular surface disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52(2):51–8.
Garcia-Zalisnak D, Nash D, Yeu E. Ocular surface diseases and corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):264–9.
•• Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2016;10:1965 Clinical retrospective analysis of 74 eyes in 49 patients documents that residual refractive error and dry eye, both a reflection of irregular astigmatism and biometric inaccuracies, are the main sources of patient dissatisfaction with multifocal IOL surgery.
de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;12:CD003169.
Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, Muller R, McAlinden C, Pineda R, et al. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015;2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-015-0022-6.
Epitropoulos AT. Visual and refractive outcomes of a toric presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1–6.
Gokce SE, Gumus K, Garibay A, Al-Mohtaseb ZN. Cataract surgery in the setting of corneal pathology. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2016;56(3):1–28.
Al-Hity A, Ramaesh K, Lockington D. EDTA chelation for symptomatic band keratopathy: results and recurrence. Eye. 2018;32(1):26–31.
Kwon YS, Song YS, Kim JC. New treatment for band keratopathy: superficial lamellar keratectomy, EDTA chelation and amniotic membrane transplantation. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19(4):611–5.
Sheppard JD, Mansur A, Comstock TL, Hovanesian JA. An update on the surgical management of pterygium and the role of loteprednol etabonate ointment. Clin ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2014;8:1105.
Friend J, Thoft RA. Functional competence of regenerating ocular surface epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17(2):134–9.
John T, Tighe S, Sheha H, Hamrah P, Salem ZM, Cheng A, et al. Corneal nerve regeneration after self-retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane in dry eye disease. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1–10.
Nakamura T, Kataoka T, Kojima T, Yoshida Y, Sugiyama Y. Refractive outcomes after phototherapeutic refractive keratectomy for granular corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 2018;37(5):548–53.
Rathi VM, Vyas SP, Sangwan VS. Phototherapeutic keratectomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(1):5–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
John D. Sheppard reports personal fees and other from Alcon/Novartis, personal fees and other from Allergan, personal fees and other from Bausch + Lomb, personal fees and other from KALA Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Omeros, and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson/TearScience, outside the submitted work. Sina Vahedi declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cataract
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vahedi, S., Sheppard, J.D. Advanced Technology IOL Cataract Surgery Optimized for Pre-existing Corneal Disease. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 6, 237–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0188-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0188-x