Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a persistent chemical that is widely used in industrial production but is suspected to have a long-term detrimental impact on the health of exposed individuals, including impaired immune protection [1].
However, evidence on the association between PFOA exposure and COVID-19-related immune protection is scarce. While a modest but not statistically significant reduction in vaccine-induced antibodies against COVID-19 was reported for higher occupational PFOA exposure [2], higher serum PFOA concentrations were associated with an impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection but not to COVID-19 vaccination in another study [3].
Here, we explored whether there were increased rates of COVID-19 breakthrough infections in the Bavarian district of Altötting, where PFOA was used in industrial production until 2008 in a chemical park. This resulted in large-scale contamination of the environment in parts of the Altötting district and increased exposure of the local population to PFOA, although recent longitudinal analyses of blood samples collected in 2018 and 2022 within a human biomonitoring survey indicated that PFOA concentrations diminished over time after restoration of the drinking water supply [4].
We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of pseudonymized data on COVID-19 cases confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). As described in more detail elsewhere [5], these data were originally collected by the local Bavarian Public Health Departments according to the German Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz, IfSG) and transmitted to the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority on a daily basis, together with further demographic and infection-related information, including vaccination status, previous COVID-19 infections and COVID-19-related hospitalization and/or death. We extracted the data of all 6,279,393 Bavarian cases reported between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 as of 4 January 2023. This time span covered the first 2 years after the introduction of publicly available COVID-19 vaccinations in Germany on 27 December 2020.
We considered COVID-19 cases as breakthrough infections if (a) at least two vaccinations were reported and the date of the second vaccination was at least 14 days prior to disease onset (or to the reporting date, if the date of disease onset was unknown) or (b) if at least one vaccination had been reported together with a previous COVID-19 infection, irrespectively of their time distance to the onset of the recent infection.
After excluding 3,490,100 cases (55.6%) with unknown immunization status, we compared the number of breakthrough infections among all reported COVID-19 infections between the district of Altötting and the remaining parts of Bavaria over time in 2021–2022.
Furthermore, we compared regional vaccination uptake rates based on data from the Robert-Koch-Institute. Given that these data cover vaccine uptake numbers per vaccination center but not per place of residence of the vaccinated person, we compared COVID-19 vaccination rates in the district of Altötting and its neighboring districts with those in the remaining Bavarian districts.
All analyses were performed using R 4.3.1 (https://cran.r-project.org/). The analysis code deposited at the time of publication is available at https://osf.io/rjs97/.
Vaccination uptake rates were comparable between the Altötting region and the remaining parts of Bavaria (Fig. 1, upper panel). Furthermore, the patterns of COVID-19 incidence were similar in the district of Altötting and whole Bavaria, although certain incidence peaks were somewhat more pronounced in Altötting (Fig. 1, middle panel). On average, the COVID-19 cases from Altötting were slightly older than were those from the rest of Bavaria (similar to the general population), while the distributions of sex were comparable (Table 1).
The rates of breakthrough infections increased over time but were slightly lower at most time points during 2021–2022 in the district of Altötting than in the rest of Bavaria (Fig. 1, lower panel). The age-stratified rates of breakthrough infections with a severe outcome (COVID-19-associated hospitalization and/or death) were similar in Altötting and the rest of Bavaria with 0.2% (33/18,671 cases with available information on immunization and severe outcome) compared to 0.2% (2998/1,775,219) in cases aged 0–59 years, 1.8% (62/3,537) compared to 2.3% (5908/254,037) in cases aged 60–79 years, and 13.2% (117/888) compared to 13.5% (7963/59,088) in cases aged 80 years or older, respectively.
Based on a large and timely surveillance dataset, these results do not indicate that COVID-19 breakthrough infections were more common or more severe in the Altötting district with its recent history of environmental PFOA exposure compared to the rest of Bavaria in 2021–2022. As expected, the number of breakthrough infections increased over time, along with increasing vaccination rates (and thus more vaccinated and fewer unvaccinated people available for infection) and also potentially due to the impact of waning immunization. As a potential limitation, the IfSG data contain no individual PFOA exposure measurements and cannot be linked with the human biomonitoring data for data protection reasons. We were therefore not able to match individuals with high PFOA exposure to those with low exposure and compare the two groups with respect to immune outcome, which would be another approach to investigate this research question. The immunization status and severity of the disease were unknown for a considerable number of COVID-19 cases, most likely due to exhausted capacities of the health authorities who collected the data. It should further be noted that our breakthrough infection rates refer to the number of COVID-19 infection records, not the number of vaccinated individuals.
Data availability
The individual infection data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity. The regional vaccination uptake rates collected by the Robert-Koch Institute (which were used as of 2 January 2023) are openly available under: https://github.com/robert-koch-institut/COVID-19-Impfungen_in_Deutschland.
References
Garvey GJ, Anderson JK, Goodrum PE, Tyndall KH, Cox LA, Khatami M, et al. Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2023;53:34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2194913.
Porter AK, Kleinschmidt SE, Andres KL, Reusch CN, Krisko RM, Taiwo OA, et al. Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines among workers with a wide range of exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Environ Int. 2022;169: 107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107537.
Hollister J, Caban-Martinez AJ, Ellingson KD, Beitel S, Fowlkes AL, Lutrick K, et al. Serum per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations and longitudinal change in post-infection and post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Environ Res. 2023;239: 117297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117297.
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit. Human-Biomonitoring-Folgeuntersuchung zur Belastung der Bevölkerung im Landkreis Altötting mit Perfluoroctansäure (PFOA) nach Ablauf einer Halbwertszeit. Zwischenbericht. 2023.
Weigert M, Beyerlein A, Katz K, Schulte R, Hartl W, Küchenhoff H. Vaccine-induced or hybrid immunity and COVID-19-associated mortality during the omicron wave. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023;120:213–20. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0051.
Funding
This research was supported by the Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.B. analyzed the data and wrote the first and final draft of the manuscript. S.H., C.Q. and K.K. contributed to the interpretation of the results and to subsequent drafts of the manuscripts. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval or informed consent of patients were not necessary because this was a secondary analysis of pseudonymous routine data, and none of the authors had the means to reidentify the data subjects.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Beyerlein, A., Heinze, S., Quartucci, C. et al. No increased rates of COVID-19 breakthrough infections in Altötting, a Bavarian district with a history of environmental PFOA contamination—results from a retrospective observational study. Infection (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02230-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02230-z