Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introns First

  • Long Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowing how introns originated should greatly enhance our understanding of the information we carry in our DNA. Gilbert’s suggestion that introns initially arose to facilitate recombination still stands, though not for the reason he gave. Reanney’s alternative, that evolution, from the early “RNA world” to today’s DNA-based world, would require the ability to detect and correct errors by recombination, now seems more likely. Consistent with this, introns are richer than exons in the potential to extrude the stem-loop structures needed for the homology search that can lead to heteroduplex formation and the recognition of base mismatches. In nucleic acid sequences that were unable concomitantly to encode sufficient stem-loop potential, protein-encoding potential was constrained to arise as segments (exons) interrupted by segments rich in stem-loop potential (introns). Thus, sequences with properties that we now deem intronic are likely to have preceded the emergence of exons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battail G (2007) Information theory and error-correcting codes in genetics and biological evolution. In: Barbieri M (ed) Introduction to biosemiotics: the new biological synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 299–345

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel JM, Wittenschlaeger T, Dwyer T, Song J, Arunachalam S, Ramakrishnan SK, Shepard S, Fedorov A (2008) Genomic mid-range inhomogeneity correlates with an abundance of RNA secondary structures. BMC Genom 9:284. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1926) The Shrewsbury edition of the works of Samuel Butler. Vol. 20. Jones HF, Bartholomew AT (eds), Jonathan Cape, London

  • Chargaff E (1951) Structure and function of nucleic acids as cell constituents. Fed Proc 10:654–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock AG, Forsdyke DR (2008) Treasure your exceptions: the science and life of William Bateson. Springer, New York, pp 339–377

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1971) General model for chromosomes of higher organisms. Nature 234:25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1979) Split genes and RNA splicing. Science 204:264–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Onofrio G, Mouchiroud D, Aïssani B, Gauter C, Bernardi G (1991) Correlations between the compositional properties of human genes, codon usage, and amino acid composition of proteins. J Mol Evol 32:504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnell JE (1978) Implications of RNA–RNA splicing in evolution of eukaryotic cells. Science 202:1257–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson WK, Yamamoto K (1999) Mean free energy topology for nucleotide sequences of varying composition on secondary structure calculations. J Theor Biol 201:113–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (1978) Genes in pieces: were they ever together? Nature 272:581–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle RF (1985) The genealogy of some recently evolved vertebrate proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 10:233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria LCB, Rocha ASL, Kleinschmidt JH, Silva-Filho MC, Bim E, Herai RH, Yamagishi MEB, Palazzo R (2012) Is a genome a codeword of an error-correcting code? PLoS ONE 7(5):e36644. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1981) Are introns in-series error detecting sequences? J Theor Biol 93:861–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995a) A stem-loop “kissing” model for the initiation of recombination and the origin of introns. Mol Biol Evol 12:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995b) Conservation of stem-loop potential in introns of snake venom phospholipase A2 genes: an application of FORS-D analysis. Mol Biol Evol 12:1157–1165

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995c) Relative roles of primary sequence and (G + C)% in determining the hierarchy of frequencies of complementary trinucleotide pairs in DNAs of different species. J Mol Evol 41:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1996) Different biological species “broadcast” their DNAs at different (G + C)% “wavelengths.” J Theor Biol 178:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2007a) Calculation of folding energies of single-stranded nucleic acid sequences: conceptual issues. J Theor Biol 248:745–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2007b) Molecular sex: the importance of base composition rather than homology when nucleic acids hybridize. J Theor Biol 249:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2011a) The interrupted gene. In: Krebs JE, Goldstein ES, Kilpatrick ST (eds) Lewin’s genes X. Jones and Bartlett, Boston, pp. 79–97, 172–175

  • Forsdyke DR (2011b) Evolutionary bioinformatics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 249–266

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2011c) The selfish gene revisited: reconciliation of Williams–Dawkins and conventional definitions. Biol Theor 5:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR, Bell SJ (2004) Purine-loading, stem-loops, and Chargaff’s second parity rule: a discussion of the application of elementary principles to early chemical observations. App Bioinf 3:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert W (1978) Why genes in pieces? Science 271:501

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert W (1981) DNA sequencing and gene structure. Science 214:1305–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1993) Fulfilling the spandrels of world and mind. In: Selzer J (ed) Understanding scientific prose. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 310–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamming RW (1980) Coding and information theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleckner N, Weiner BM (1993) Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic and premeiotic cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 58:553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le S-Y, Maizel JV (1989) A method for assessing the statistical significance of RNA folding. J Theor Biol 138:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch LS, Tao Y, Todorov AT, Levine L (1996) Is there an error-correcting code in the base sequence of DNA? Biophys J 71:1539–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo K, Clay O, Kunzler P, Georgiev O, Urbanek P, Schaffner W (1994) Short introns interrupting the Oct-2 POU domain may prevent recombination between POU family genes without interfering with potential POU domain ‘shuffling’ in evolution. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 375:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morange M (1998) A history of molecular biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan TH (1911) Random segregation versus coupling in Mendelian inheritance. Science 34:384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgel LE, Crick FHC, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish DNA. Nature 288:645–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penny D, Hoeppner MP, Poole AM, Jeffares DC (2009) An overview of the intron-first theory. J Mol Evol 69:527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer K, Tilghman SM (1994) Allele-specific gene expression in mammals: the curious case of imprinted RNAs. Genes Devel 8:1867–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu VV (1993) Symmetry observations in long nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 21:2797–2800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reanney DC (1978) Noncoding sequences in adaptive genetics. In: Fox CF, Todaro GJ, Stevens JG (eds) Persistent viruses. Proceedings of the 1978 ICN-UCLA symposium on molecular and cellular biology held in Keystone, Colorado. Academic Press, New York, pp 311–330

  • Reanney DC (1979) RNA splicing and polynucleotide evolution. Nature 277:598–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reanney DC (1984) RNA splicing as an error-screening mechanism. J Theor Biol 110:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese V (2002) Mutation repair: a proposed mechanism that would enable complex genomes to better resist mutational entropy, and which suggests a novel function for meiosis. The human behavior and evolution society 14th annual meeting, Rutgers University. Abstracts of presentations to session on “New Developments in Biology,” p 40

  • Robertson M (1977) Immunoglobulin genes and the immune response. Nature 269:648–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogozin IB, Carmel L, Csuros M, Koonin EV (2012) Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns. Biol Direct 7:11. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-7-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudner R, Karkas JD, Chargaff E (1968) Separation of B. subtilis DNA into complementary strands. III. Direct analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 60:921–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiemeier DC, Tilghman SM, Polsky FI, Seidman JG, Leder A, Edgell MH, Leder P (1978) A comparison of two cloned mouse β-globin genes and their surrounding and intervening sequences. Cell 14:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomizawa J (1984) Control of ColE1 plasmid replication: the process of binding of RNA I to the primer transcript. Cell 38:861–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov AE (2001) Within-intron correlation with base composition of adjacent exons in different genomes. Gene 276:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DM, Ruxton GD (2012) Understanding selection for long necks in different taxa. Biol Rev 87:616–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski JA (1988) The discovery of ‘split’ genes: a scientific revolution. Trends Biochem Sci 13:110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Yuan Y, Wang L, Li J, Wang W, Liu H, Chen J-Q, Hurst LD, Tian D (2012) Great majority of recombination events in Arabidopsis are gene conversion events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:20992–20997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Xu S, Wei J-F, Forsdyke DR (2008a) Microsatellites that violate Chargaff’s second parity rule have base order-dependent asymmetries in the folding energies of complementary DNA strands and may not drive speciation. J Theor Biol 254:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Li W-H, Krainer AR, Zhang MQ (2008b) RNA landscape of evolution for optimal exons and intron discrimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5797–5802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuker M (1990) Prediction of optimal and suboptimal secondary structure for RNA. Meth Enzymol 183:281–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Queen’s University hosts my intron webpages (http://post.queensu.ca/~forsdyke/introns.htm).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Donald R. Forsdyke

Authors
  1. Donald R. Forsdyke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald R. Forsdyke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsdyke, D.R. Introns First. Biol Theory 7, 196–203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0090-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0090-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation