Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Ecotheological Beliefs Vary Among Australian Churchgoers and Consequences for Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Worldviews play an important part in shaping and driving people’s more specific environmental attitudes and behaviors. In a religious context, attention to eco(theo)logical worldviews, defined as foundational beliefs about the relationships between God, the Earth and humanity, helps researchers and environmental practitioners alike to better understand the religious frameworks which may foster or impede environmental action. This study draws on data from the 2011 Australian National Church Life Survey to examine churchgoers’ beliefs about the presence of God in nature and human dominion over the environment. Australian churchgoers strongly affirmed the presence of God in the natural world, but were less affirming of dominion theology. Dominion varied between church traditions, but beliefs about the presence of God did not. The beliefs predicted a range of measures of environmental attitudes and behaviors. The results regarding dominion are consistent with findings from other countries, and the research extends previous limited work on the sanctification of nature to a concept of the presence of God in the natural world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, David C., and David H. Bearce. 2013. End-times theology, the shadow of the future, and public resistance to addressing global climate change. Political Research Quarterly 66(2): 267–279. doi:10.1177/1065912912442243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedictus PP. XVI. 2010. If you want to cultivate peace, protect creation. Message of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI for the Celebration of the World Day of Peace, 1 January 2010. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20091208_xliii-world-day-peace_en.html. Accessed 29 July 2011.

  • Chryssavgis, John. undated. The Green Patriarch: Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and the protection of the environment. http://www.patriarchate.org/patriarch/the-green-patriach. Accessed 9 April 2013.

  • Clements, Ben. 2012. The sociological and attitudinal bases of environmentally-related beliefs and behaviour in Britain. Environmental Politics 21(6): 901–921. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.724215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deane-Drummond, Celia. 2008. Eco-theology. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas, Paul C. Stern, and Gregory A. Guagnano. 1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30(4): 450–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djupe, Paul A., and Patrick Kieran Hunt. 2009. Beyond the Lynn White thesis: Congregational effects on environmental concern. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(4): 670–686. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01472.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Steve. 2009. Religious environmentalism in the West. II: Impediments to the Praxis of Christian Environmentalism in Australia. Religion Compass 3(4): 738–751. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00162.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E., and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education 9(4): 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E., Kent D. Van Liere, Angela G. Mertig, and Robert Emmet Jones. 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckberg, Douglas Lee, and T.Jean Blocker. 1996. Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 35(4): 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Justin. 2013. Environmental activism and moral schemas: Cultural components of differential participation. Environment and Behavior 45(3): 399–423. doi:10.1177/0013916511422445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Matthew. 1983. Original blessing: A primer in creation spirituality. Santa Fe, NM: Bear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis. 2015. Laudato Si’: On care for our common home, encyclical letter. https://laudatosi.com/. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Gardner, Gerald T., and Paul C. Stern. 2002. Environmental problems and human behavior, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, Birgitta, Linda Steg, and Charles Vlek. 2002. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior 34(3): 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Robin. 1999. Churchgoing and Christian ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, James L., John C. Green, Lyman A. Kellstedt, and Corwin E. Smidt. 1995. Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, Carl M., and Kent D. Van Liere. 1984. Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces 63(2): 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bernadette G., and Manussos Marangudakis. 2001. Religion and attitudes towards nature in Britain. The British Journal of Sociology 52(1): 139–155. doi:10.1080/00071310020023073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund-de Witt, Annick. 2012. Exploring worldviews and their relationships to sustainable lifestyles: Towards a new conceptual and methodological approach. Ecological Economics 84: 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund-de, Witt, Annick, Joop de Boer and Jan J. Boersema. 2014. Exploring inner and outer worlds: A quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Environmental Psychology 37: 40–54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Adam Douglas, and Thomas Dietz. 2012. Understanding environmental cognition. Organization & Environment 25(3): 238–258. doi:10.1177/1086026612456538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes-Smith, P. 2011. Structural equation modelling: From fundamentals to advanced topics. Melbourne: SREAMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Li-tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Philip J. 1997. Values and Religion: A Case Study of Environmental Concern and Christian Beliefs and Practices among Australians. Christian Research Association Research Paper No.3. Melbourne: Christian Research Association.

  • Hughes, Philip, Margaret Fraser, and Stephen Reid. 2012. Australia’s religious communities: Facts and figures from the 2011 Australian Census and other sources. Nunawading, Victoria: Christian Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Peter, Robert Dixon, Ruth Powell, John Bellamy, Bronwyn Hughes, Sandra Moore, and James Dalziel. 1999. Taking stock: A profile of Australian church attenders. Adelaide: Openbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagy, Conrad L., and Fern K. Willits. 1993. A “Greening” of religion? Some evidence from a Pennsylvania sample. Social Science Quarterly 74(3): 674–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Laurel. 1996. Saving the creation: Christian environmentalism in the United States. Sociology of Religion 57(1): 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Laurel. 2004. The Context of Eco-theology. In The Blackwell companion to modern theology, ed. Gareth Jones, 466–484. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, David A. 2014. Measuring Model Fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm. Accessed.

  • Kilbourne, William E., Suzanne C. Beckmann, Alan Lewis, and Ynte van Dam. 2001. A multinational examination of the role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes of university students. Environment and Behavior 33(2): 209–228. doi:10.1177/00139160121972954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klineberg, Stephen L., Matthew McKeever, and Bert Rothenbach. 1998. Demographic Predictors of Environmental Concern: It Does Make a Difference How It's Measured. Social Science Quarterly 79(4): 734–753.

  • Koltko-Rivera, Mark E. 2004. The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology 8(1): 3–58. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Rosemary J., and Miriam D. Pepper. 2015. Les attitudes face aux changements climatiques et les actions pour la décroissance énergétique des chrétiens pratiquants: les effets des persuasions religieuses et du capital social. Social Compass 62(3): 326–343. doi:10.1177/0037768615587812.

  • Leviston, Zoe, Anne Leitch, Murni Greenhill, Rosemary Leonard, and Iain Walker. 2011. Australians’ views of climate change. Canberra: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviston, Zoe, and Iain Walker. 2012. Second annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: Interim Report: Social & Behavioural Sciences Research Group, CSIRO.

  • Maio, Gregory R., James M. Olson, Lindsay Allen, and Mark M. Bernard. 2001. Addressing discrepancies between values and behavior: The motivating effect of reasons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37(2): 104–117. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, William C., and Connie R. Bateman. 2013. Consumer religious commitment’s influence on ecocentric attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, Taciano L., and John Duckitt. 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 80–94. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooney, Jennifer G., Eric Woodrum, Thomas J. Hoban, and William B. Clifford. 2003. Environmental worldviews and behavior: Consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians. Environment and Behavior 35(6): 763–783. doi:10.1177/0013916503256246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, Annika M., and Jörgen Garvill. 2002. Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 340(6): 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olli, Eero, Gunnar Grendstad, and Dag Wollebaek. 2001. Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior 33(2): 181–208. doi:10.1177/0013916501332002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Miriam, Tim Jackson, and David Uzzell. 2009. An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33(2): 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Miriam, and Jason John. 2014. Ecological Engagement. In An informed faith: The Uniting Church at the beginning of the 21st century, ed. William Emilsen, 189–213. Preston, Victoria: Mosaic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Miriam, and Ruth Powell. 2013. Local church environmental activity, occasional paper 20. Sydney: NCLS Research, Australian Catholic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Miriam, Sam Sterland, and Ruth Powell. (2015). Methodological overview of the study of well-being through the National Church Life Survey. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 18(1): 8–19. doi:10.1080/13674676.2015.1009717.

  • Powell, Ruth, John Bellamy, Sam Sterland, Kathy Jacka, Miriam Pepper, and Michael Brady. 2012. Enriching church life: A guide to results from National Church Life Surveys for local churches, 2nd ed. Sydney: Mirrabooka Press & NCLS Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, D.C., and P.R. Ehrlich. 1974. Ark II: Social responses to environmental imperatives. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santmire, H. Paul. 1992. The travail of nature: The ambiguous ecological promise of Christian theology. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santmire, H. Paul. 2000. Nature reborn: The ecological and cosmic promise of Christian theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Wesley P., Lynnette Zelezny, and Nancy J. Dalrymple. 2000. A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 32(4): 576–591. doi:10.1177/00139160021972676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaiko, Ronald G. 1987. Religion, politics, and environmental concern: A powerful mix of passions. Social Science Quarterly 68(2): 244–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, Darren E., and Christopher G. Ellison. 2007. Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46(1): 71–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00341.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Angela M., and Simone Pulver. 2009. Ethics-based environmentalism in practice: Religious-environmental organizations in the United States. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 13(2): 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul C., Thomas Dietz, Troy Abel, Gregory A. Guagnano, and Linda Kalof. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology 6(2): 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Aaron B. Swank, Kenneth I. Pargament, and Annette Mahoney. 2001. The sanctification of nature and theological conservatism: A study of opposing religious correlates of environmentalism. Review of Religious Research 42(4): 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Suzanne C.Gagnon, and Michelle A. Barton. 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14(2): 149–157. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White Jr., Lynn. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767): 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Rowan. 2004. Changing the myths we live by, Lecture at Lambeth Palace 5 July 2004. http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1573/changing-the-myths-we-live-by-archbishop-delivers-major-environment-lecture. Accessed 29 July 2011.

  • Wolkomir, Michelle, Michael Futreal, Eric Woodrum, and Thomas Hoban. 1997. Substantive religious belief and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly 78(1): 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrum, Eric, and Thomas Hoban. 1994. Theology and religiosity effects on environmentalism. Review of Religious Research 35(3): 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NCLS Research, Australian Catholic University, PO Box 968, North Sydney, NSW, 2059, Australia

    Miriam Pepper

  2. Land and Water and School of Social Sciences and Psychology, CSIRO and Western Sydney University, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA, 6913, Australia

    Rosemary Leonard

Authors
  1. Miriam Pepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosemary Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Pepper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pepper, M., Leonard, R. How Ecotheological Beliefs Vary Among Australian Churchgoers and Consequences for Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Rev Relig Res 58, 101–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-015-0234-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-015-0234-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation