Abstract
Twenty-five patients ASA II-IV suffering from diabetic foot that were previously scheduled for debridement or amputation (lower than the ankle) were recruited to receive the sciatic and femoral nerve block. All of the patients were placed supine, with the head of bed at an elevation of 30–45°. Sciatic and femoral nerves were blocked by the injection of 10 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine into two sites using ultrasound guidance. The first site was 7–9 cm above the popliteal fossa, and the second site was in the middle of the groin. All 25 cases obtained a satisfactory analgesia effect. The mean total procedure time of the sciatic and femoral nerve block was less than 10 min (8.3 ± 2.7 min). The sensory onset time was 16.3 ± 6.5 min, and the duration of sensory block was 586 ± 144 min. The motor onset time was 28.6 ± 13.7 min, and the duration of motor block was 498 ± 255 min. None of the patients required additional analgesics. No remarkable circulatory or respiratory changes related to anesthesia were observed. Four of the patients exhibited nausea and vomiting and were treated effectively with 4 mg ondansetron i.v. One patient complained of weakness in the affected lower limb 2 days after surgery yet fully recovered the next day without any treatment. Our pilot study indicated that ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block in supine position for surgical management of diabetic foot in critical patients is a safe and efficacious approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, Zhu D, Ge J, Lin L, Chen L, Guo X, Zhao Z, Li Q, Zhou Z, Shan G, J H. China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study Group. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–101.
Wong IO, Cowling BJ, Schooling CM. Vulnerability to diabetes in Chinese: an age-period-cohort analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25(1):34–9.
Birke JA, Patout Jr CA, Foto JG. Factors associated with ulceration and amputation in the neuropathic foot. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(2):91–7.
Shah BR, Hux JE. Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(2):510–3.
Chuah KH, Thong CL, Krshnan H, Chan L. Low dose unilateral spinal anaesthesia for lower limb amputation in critically ill patients. Med J Malaysia. 2007;62(1):81–2.
Negoro T, Mizumoto K, Ogawa K, Hironaka Y, Kakutani T, Hatano Y. Effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia on arteriovenous shunt flow in the lower limb of diabetic patients without autonomic neuropathy. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):45–52.
Keyl C, Held T, Albiez G, Schmack A, Wiesenack C. Increased electrical nerve stimulation threshold of the sciatic nerve in patients with diabetic foot gangrene: a prospective parallel cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(7):435–40.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(3):206–8.
Marhofer D, Kettner SC, Marhofer P, Pils S, Weber M, Zeitlinger M. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs peripheral nerve block: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(3):438–42.
Bener A, Al-Laftah F, Al-Hamaq AO, Daghash M, Abdullatef WK. A study of diabetes complications in an endogamous population: an emerging public health burden. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014;8(2):108–14.
Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, Ecoffey C, Falissard B, Mercier FJ, Bouaziz H, Samii K. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: the SOS regional anesthesia hotline service. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1274–80.
Perlas A, Wong P, Abdallah F, Hazrati LN, Tse C, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block through a common paraneural sheath versus conventional injection: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(3):218–25.
Waag S, Stoffel MH, Spadavecchia C, Eichenberger U, Rohrbach H. Ultrasound-guided block of sciatic and femoral nerves: an anatomical study. Lab Anim. 2014;48(2):97–104.
Perlas A, Brull R, Chan VW, McCartney CJ, Nuica A, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(3):259–65.
Yamamoto H, Sakura S, Wada M, Shido A. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and multiple-injection techniques for ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(6):1442–8.
Ehlers L, Jensen JM, Bendtsen TF. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound vs nerve stimulation guidance for continuous sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):804–8.
Lam NC, Petersen TR, Gerstein NS, Yen T, Starr B, Mariano ER. A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus nerve stimulation for lateral popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in obese patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(6):1057–63.
Ponde V, Desai AP, Shah D. Comparison of success rate of ultrasound-guided sciatic and femoral nerve block and neurostimulation in children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(1):74–8.
Khabiri B, Hamilton C, Norton J, Arbona F. Ultrasound-guided supine posterior approach for popliteal sciatic nerve block. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24(8):680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval for this study (Ethical Committee No. 08W04) was provided by the Ethical Committee of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of TCM, Guangzhou, China (Chairman Prof. Xiao-yun Wang) on March 28, 2009 and performed in accord with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [8].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Guo-cai Li and Yan-sheng Chen contributed equally to the article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Gc., Chen, Ys., Wei, W. et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block in supine position for surgical management of diabetic foot in critical patients: pilot study of 25 cases. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 37, 221–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0486-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0486-5