Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block in supine position for surgical management of diabetic foot in critical patients: pilot study of 25 cases

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-five patients ASA II-IV suffering from diabetic foot that were previously scheduled for debridement or amputation (lower than the ankle) were recruited to receive the sciatic and femoral nerve block. All of the patients were placed supine, with the head of bed at an elevation of 30–45°. Sciatic and femoral nerves were blocked by the injection of 10 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine into two sites using ultrasound guidance. The first site was 7–9 cm above the popliteal fossa, and the second site was in the middle of the groin. All 25 cases obtained a satisfactory analgesia effect. The mean total procedure time of the sciatic and femoral nerve block was less than 10 min (8.3 ± 2.7 min). The sensory onset time was 16.3 ± 6.5 min, and the duration of sensory block was 586 ± 144 min. The motor onset time was 28.6 ± 13.7 min, and the duration of motor block was 498 ± 255 min. None of the patients required additional analgesics. No remarkable circulatory or respiratory changes related to anesthesia were observed. Four of the patients exhibited nausea and vomiting and were treated effectively with 4 mg ondansetron i.v. One patient complained of weakness in the affected lower limb 2 days after surgery yet fully recovered the next day without any treatment. Our pilot study indicated that ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block in supine position for surgical management of diabetic foot in critical patients is a safe and efficacious approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, Zhu D, Ge J, Lin L, Chen L, Guo X, Zhao Z, Li Q, Zhou Z, Shan G, J H. China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study Group. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong IO, Cowling BJ, Schooling CM. Vulnerability to diabetes in Chinese: an age-period-cohort analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25(1):34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Birke JA, Patout Jr CA, Foto JG. Factors associated with ulceration and amputation in the neuropathic foot. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(2):91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah BR, Hux JE. Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(2):510–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuah KH, Thong CL, Krshnan H, Chan L. Low dose unilateral spinal anaesthesia for lower limb amputation in critically ill patients. Med J Malaysia. 2007;62(1):81–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Negoro T, Mizumoto K, Ogawa K, Hironaka Y, Kakutani T, Hatano Y. Effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia on arteriovenous shunt flow in the lower limb of diabetic patients without autonomic neuropathy. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):45–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keyl C, Held T, Albiez G, Schmack A, Wiesenack C. Increased electrical nerve stimulation threshold of the sciatic nerve in patients with diabetic foot gangrene: a prospective parallel cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(7):435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(3):206–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marhofer D, Kettner SC, Marhofer P, Pils S, Weber M, Zeitlinger M. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs peripheral nerve block: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(3):438–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bener A, Al-Laftah F, Al-Hamaq AO, Daghash M, Abdullatef WK. A study of diabetes complications in an endogamous population: an emerging public health burden. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014;8(2):108–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, Ecoffey C, Falissard B, Mercier FJ, Bouaziz H, Samii K. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: the SOS regional anesthesia hotline service. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1274–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perlas A, Wong P, Abdallah F, Hazrati LN, Tse C, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block through a common paraneural sheath versus conventional injection: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(3):218–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Waag S, Stoffel MH, Spadavecchia C, Eichenberger U, Rohrbach H. Ultrasound-guided block of sciatic and femoral nerves: an anatomical study. Lab Anim. 2014;48(2):97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perlas A, Brull R, Chan VW, McCartney CJ, Nuica A, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(3):259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto H, Sakura S, Wada M, Shido A. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and multiple-injection techniques for ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(6):1442–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehlers L, Jensen JM, Bendtsen TF. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound vs nerve stimulation guidance for continuous sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):804–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam NC, Petersen TR, Gerstein NS, Yen T, Starr B, Mariano ER. A randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus nerve stimulation for lateral popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in obese patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(6):1057–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ponde V, Desai AP, Shah D. Comparison of success rate of ultrasound-guided sciatic and femoral nerve block and neurostimulation in children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(1):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khabiri B, Hamilton C, Norton J, Arbona F. Ultrasound-guided supine posterior approach for popliteal sciatic nerve block. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24(8):680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bo Yang or Wei-xian Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval for this study (Ethical Committee No. 08W04) was provided by the Ethical Committee of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of TCM, Guangzhou, China (Chairman Prof. Xiao-yun Wang) on March 28, 2009 and performed in accord with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [8].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Guo-cai Li and Yan-sheng Chen contributed equally to the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Gc., Chen, Ys., Wei, W. et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block in supine position for surgical management of diabetic foot in critical patients: pilot study of 25 cases. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 37, 221–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0486-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0486-5

Keywords

Navigation