Introduction

Gold wire has been used as bonding wire in IC packages because of its ductility and anticorrosion characteristics. Recently, the increase in the I/O number of ICs from 200 to 300 has required diameter of gold wires to decrease from 25 μm to less than 20 μm to match the decrease in the area of the Al pad. Nevertheless, the stiffness of gold wire must be enhanced to avoid short circuits derived from wire sweep. Au-Cu alloy wire is one of the new alloy bonding wires that has been developed. The bonding wire reacts with the Al pad and forms intermetallic phases to maintain the electrical connection. A low-temperature Au-Al-Cu phase diagram could provide essential information to understand the reactions between the Au-Cu alloy wire and the Al pad. The stability of intermetallic phases is closely related to the reliability of wire bonding [1, 2].

A β (Au7Al4Cu5) phase exhibiting martensite-like properties was developed [35]. The embossed and fine-layered surface of this material, which originates from a martensitic transformation, exhibits a characteristic shining color and is used in Spangold jewelry.

Binary systems in Au-Al-Cu systems have been studied in depth. Al-Au binary systems exhibit five intermediate phases at 500 °C, namely, AuAl2, AuAl, Au2Al, Au8Al3 (Au5Al2), and Au4Al [6]. Al-Cu binary systems exhibit five intermediate phases at 500 °C, namely, θ (Al2Cu), η2 (AlCu), ζ2 (Al9Cu11), δ (Al2Cu3), and γ1 phases [7]. Au-Cu binary systems form solid solution at 500 °C [8].

In recent decades, several researchers have studied Au-Al-Cu ternary systems. The isothermal sections of Au-Al-Cu at 500 °C were reported by Levey et al. [911] and those at 750 °C by Bhatia et al. [12]. Levey et al. [13] also constructed isopleths for the 76 wt.% Au section. These previous phase-diagram studies were conducted by applying traditional bulk alloy equilibrium. Isothermal phase diagrams were constructed by preparing bulk alloys with various compositions and annealing them at a certain high temperature to reach phase equilibrium. This method is not suitable for constructing gold-based low-temperature phase diagrams because it is too expensive to prepare 30 to 50 samples without recovering the Au precious metal, and it would take much time to reach phase equilibrium because of the low temperature used. This study applied the diffusion couple method to construct the Au-Al-Cu ternary 500 °C phase diagram. This method uses little Au and easily attains the local phase equilibrium within 1 day. In this method, the interface and phases on both sides of the interface reach equilibrium, and the relationships among these phases are thereby elucidated. A detailed diffusion couple theory is available in [14].

Experimental procedures

The alloys were prepared through mini arc melting of pure Au, Cu, and Al under a pure Ar atmosphere. Afterward, the samples were cast into a 2-mm diameter ingot bar. Nine Au-Cu binary alloys (D1–D9) and 12 Au-Al-Cu ternary alloys (A1–A12) were prepared for this phase diagram study. The alloy compositions are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1 Summary of phase equilibria in nine diffusion couples
Table 2 Summary of phase equilibria in 12 bulk alloy samples

Figure 1 is the schematic diagram of the diffusion couple setup. The Au-Cu binary alloy ingots (D1–D9) were sliced into 1-mm-thick discs, and a pure aluminum bar with a 2-mm diameter was sliced into 2-mm-thick discs. The discs were joined to form a diffusion couple. The screw of the holder exerted pressure on the diffusion couple. The holder was sealed in a quartz tube to form a vacuum, maintained at 500 °C for 24 h, and then quenched in ice water. The ternary alloys (A1–A12) were sealed in the quartz tube vacuum. These alloy samples were maintained at 500 °C for 14–29 days.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The sketch diagram of diffusion couple setup

An electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) was used to determine the equilibrium phase compositions of the diffusion couple samples and ternary alloy samples. The isothermal phase diagram of the Au-Al-Cu annealed at 500 °C was constructed based on these results.

Results

The phase equilibria of the diffusion couples are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Figs. 2a, b, the D1 diffusion couple formed the equilibrium phase layers Al/AuAl2/AuAl/δ (Au2Al)/α (Au, Cu). The phase layer thickness of AuAl2 and AuAl was approximately 10 μm each, and the δ (Au2Al) phase was approximately 300 μm thick. The latter binary phase extends into ternary with large composition range in Cu and Au. The original interface was present within the δ (Au2Al) phase (Fig. 2a), indicating that the diffusion rates of Cu and Au were faster than that of Al. As shown in Figs. 3a, b, c, the D5 diffusion couple comprised several phase layers: Al/Al2Cu/AlCu and ε/Al9Cu11/Al2Cu3/AuAl2/γ/β/α (Au, Cu). The line-scan imaging results of the D5 diffusion sample are shown in Fig. 3d. A two-phase layer (AlCu + ε) was in contact with the Al2Cu phase layer; therefore, the Al2Cu-ε-AlCu three-phase equilibrium was generated. The existence of this three-phase equilibrium was confirmed through the alloy sample A1 and the equilibrium microstructure (Fig. 4). The phase equilibria of the alloy equilibrium samples are summarized in Table 2. According to the results in Tables 1 and 2, the determined phase diagram is shown in Fig. 5. In the diffusion couple experiment, seven sets of three-phase equilibria, namely, Al-AuAl2-Al2Cu, A12Cu-ε-AlCu, γ-AuAl2-Al2Cu3, AuAl-δ (Au2Al) -γ, δ (Au2Al)-α-β, AlCu-AuAl2-Al9Cu11, and Al9Cu11-AuAl2-Al2Cu3 were determined from the phase relationships, resembling the result of the Al2Cu-ε-AlCu three-phase equilibrium shown in Fig. 3c. The other three-phase equilibria (AuA12-ε-AlCu, γ-AuAl2-AuAl, and Au8Al3-δ (Au2Al)-Au4Al) were determined by applying the alloy equilibrium methods to alloy samples A2, A3, and A5 (Table 2). These 10 sets of three-phase equilibria are shown as solid lines in Fig. 5. In addition, the AuA12-ε-Al2Cu three-phase equilibria were determined based on their two-phase equilibria. The other three sets of three-phase equilibria were estimated to meet the phase relationships shown as dashed lines in Fig. 5. The diffusion paths of D1 and D5 are plotted in Fig. 6, covering most of the binary and ternary phases. All of the binary intermediate phases in Al-Au [6] and Al-Cu [7] were identified in this study. For the Au-Cu [8] system, only the α (Au, Cu) phase appeared at 500 °C. The solubility of Al in the α (Au, Cu) phase was determined using an EPMA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a The whole view of D1 sample microstructure. b The detail phase layers of the A region in (a)

Fig. 3
figure 3

a The whole view of D5 sample microstructure. b The detail phase layers of the A region in (a) as Al/Al2Cu/AlCu, ε/Al9Cu11/Al2Cu3/AuAl2/γ/β. c The detail phase layers of the A region in (a) as Al/Al2Cu/AlCu, ε/Al9Cu11/Al2Cu3. d A composition profile of the D5 sample measured by EPMA

Fig. 4
figure 4

The microstructure of A1 alloy sample including Al2Cu, ε and AlCu phases

Fig. 5
figure 5

The isotherm of Au-Al-Cu at 500 °C determined by this study

Fig. 6
figure 6

The diffusion paths of D1 and D5 samples

Figure 7 shows the Au-Al-Cu isothermal section obtained through bulk alloy equilibrium at 500 °C, reported by Levey et al. [911]. According to this study, the maximum Au solubility in the γ-AlCu2 phase reached 48 at.%, agreeing with the result of Levey et al. [911]. The composition range and shape of the ternary β phase reported by these authors was confirmed in this study. In the D3–D7 samples, the β phase layer was present between the γ phase and α phase layers.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The isotherm of the Au-Al-Cu at 500 °C determined by F.C. Levey et al. [911]

Ternary phase δ (Au2Al) was also identified in this study. The homogeneity range of the δ (Au2Al) phase was primarily determined from the composition range of the single-phase diffusion layer in the D1, D2, and D3 diffusion couples. The line-scan imaging results of the D1 diffusion sample are shown in Fig. 8. The peculiar concave shape was confirmed by analyzing the A4, A8, and A9 alloy samples, and the microstructure and compositions of tie lines between the δ (Au2Al) and β phases are shown in Fig. 9. The crystal structure of δ (Au2Al) phase was examined by X-ray in the A4, A8, A11, and A12 alloy samples. The lattice parameters are plotted and listed in Fig. 10.

Fig. 8
figure 8

A composition profile of the D1 sample measured by EPMA

Fig. 9
figure 9

The microstructure and tie lines of δ (Au2Al) and β phases determined from A4, A8, and A9 alloy samples

Fig. 10
figure 10

The lattice parameters of δ (Au2Al) phase

The ε ternary phase identified in the D4–D9 diffusion couples comprised with AlCu phase as two-phase layer in equilibrium with an AuAl2 phase layer (Fig. 3c). The ε phase was not present as a single-phase layer in these diffusion couples. The composition range was determined using the three-phase equilibria of the A12Cu-ε-AlCu and AuAl2-ε-AlCu of the A1 and A2 alloy samples, respectively. The equilibrium microstructure and microprobe analysis results are shown in Figs. 4 and 11. The ε phase contained 25 to 33.4 at.% of Cu and 62.4 to 65 at.% of Al.

Fig. 11
figure 11

The microstructure of A2 alloy sample including AuAl2, ε and AlCu phases

Discussion

In this study, a classical semi-infinite diffusion couple was applied, meaning that the end couples maintained their original compositions after the diffusion couple annealing. If volume diffusion in a semi-infinite couple is a rate-limiting step, local equilibrium is assumed to exist, in which case the rules described previously can be used to relate the reaction zone morphology developed during isothermal diffusion to the phase diagram. The phase composition of the reaction zone is independent of time, whereas that of the diffusion path is fixed. A D8 diffusion couple was annealed for 5 days to compare it with the 1-day diffusion couple. No difference was observed among the phases formed in each diffusion layer, and only the layer thickness differed. The versatility of this technique for constructing isothermal cross sections of ternary systems has been demonstrated repeatedly [14].

The D2 diffusion path was plotted on the Au-rich region (Fig. 12a), and its corresponding microstructure is shown in Figs. 12b, c. The solid a-b line crossed the α single-phase field, and the dashed b-c line crossed the δ (Au2Al)-α-β three-phase region, indicating the presence of an interface in the diffusion structure, with equilibrium between the α single-phase and δ (Au2Al)-β two-phase region. The microstructure of the corresponding three-phase region is shown in Fig. 12b and is marked as the interface b-c; c-d is the δ (Au2Al)-β two-phase region. The solid d-e-f-g line in Fig. 12a shows that the diffusion path entered the δ (Au2Al) single-phase region, returned to the δ (Au2Al)-β two-phase region, and then entered the δ (Au2Al) single-phase region again. The thickness of the δ (Au2Al)-β two-phase region was approximately 150 μm and was contained within the δ (Au2Al) single-phase region. Figure 12c shows the other side of this microstructure. This diffusion path could explain why the β phase formed within the δ (Au2Al) phase layer.

Fig. 12
figure 12

a The diffusion path of D2 diffusion couple and sketch figure. b The microstructure of D2 diffusion couple with the label (a to f) c The microstructure of D2 diffusion couple shows β phase formed within δ (Au2Al) phase with the label (e to g)

The diffusion paths D8 and D9 crossed three three-phase regions (AlCu-AuAl2-Al9Cu11, Al9Cu11-AuAl2-Al2Cu3, and γ-AuAl2-Al2Cu3) with AuAl2 as the common matrix phase. Figure 13a shows the diffusion path near the Al-Cu binary region, and Fig. 13b is the plot displaying the equilibrium of these three phases along with their related two-phase regions. According to Fig. 13b, d-e is the γ-AuAl2-Al2Cu3 three-phase equilibrium, e-f is the AuAl2-Al2Cu3 two-phase region, f-g is the Al9Cu11-AuAl2-Al2Cu3 three-phase equilibrium, g-h is the Al9Cu11-AuAl2 two-phase region, h-i is the AlCu-AuAl2-Al9Cu11 three-phase equilibrium, i-j is AlCu-AuAl2, j-k is the AlCu single-phase region, k-l is the ε-AlCu two-phase region, and l-m is the ε-AlCu-Al2Cu three-phase equilibrium. The microstructure and corresponding sketch are shown in Fig. 13c, and are labeled from d to m, as described previously.

Fig. 13
figure 13

a The diffusion path of D8 diffusion couple near the Al-Cu binary region. b The sketch figure of D8 diffusion path. c The microstructure of D8 diffusion couple with the label (d to m) and sketch figure

In comparison with Levey [911], new ternary phase ε and their related three-phase equilibria were identified in this study. Ternary ε phase exhibited a composition similar to that of the binary Al2Cu phase and contained 25 to 33.4 at.% of Cu and 62.4 to 65 at.% of Al. Three related three-phase equilibria were also observed, namely, AuAl2-ε-AlCu, Al2Cu-ε-AlCu, and AuAl2-ε-Al2Cu. The β phase reported by Levey was also identified. However, the phase relationships exhibited some differences, because the δ (Au2Al) phase exhibited a wide range of solubility and a peculiarly shaped phase field in the Au-rich region. Therefore, three additional three-phase equilibria (β-δ (Au2Al)-α, β-α-γ, and β-δ (Au2Al)-γ) were identified in this study. Finally, the solubility of Au in the Al9Cu11 and Al2Cu3 phases was limited.

Conclusion

The isothermal section of an Au-Al-Cu system annealed at 500 °C was presented in this study. The whole composition range included two ternary phases (ε and β) and 14 three-phase equilibria. The δ (Au2Al) phase exhibited a wide range of solubility and a peculiar morphology. The ε phase contained 25 to 33.4 at.% of Cu and 62.4 to 65 at.% of Al. Ten three-phase equilibria were determined in this study, namely, Al-AuAl2-Al2Cu, A12Cu-ε-AlCu, AuAl2-ε-AlCu, AuAl2-AuAl-γ, AuAl-δ (Au2Al)-γ, δ (Au2Al)-α-β, Au8Al3-δ (Au2Al)-Au4Al, AlCu-AuAl2-Al9Cu11, Al9Cu11-AuAl2-Al2Cu3, and Al2Cu3-AuAl2-γ. Four three-phase equilibria, namely, β-δ (Au2Al)-γ, α-β-γ, α-δ (Au2Al)-Au4Al, and AuA12-ε-Al2Cu were estimated to meet the criteria for phase relationships.