Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Techno-economical and practical considerations for SHM systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the increasing demand of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems, either for research or specific monitoring applications, is posing several questions on their technical and economical sustainability. In general, the initial cost of a full scope and long-term SHM system is significant, but also, the operational and maintenance costs have an important role. In practice, it has been found that there is a correlation between the cost of the SHM system and its main monitoring scope, including the size and complexity of the structure to be monitored. Additional considerations must include peripheral systems (hardware and software) to process, analyze and to store data efficiently for long-term evaluations. Even though, most SHM systems are designed assuming that the benefits overweight the costs. In practice, the payback from technical knowledge, maintenance reduction costs, safety or reliability, are not easy (if not impossible) to quantify. While most engineers and researchers are thinking on sophisticated techniques and more efficient or accurate sensors, the users concerns are on practical and economic issues to justify the initial investment and the cost to operate the monitoring system. Cost-benefit or cost-efficiency analysis is not an ordinary practice for researchers, but is becoming a standard requirement for infrastructure investment projects. In this document, the guidelines for the preparation and presentation of cost and benefit analysis of investment programs and projects required by the Mexican Government, are used to evaluate some specific SHM systems of highway bridges. In general, it is found that the main challenge for these analyses is the availability of conclusive information to justify the sustainability of the monitoring projects, especially those which are related to the benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mufti A (2013) Editorial. J. Civil Struct Health Monit 3(1):1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Habel WR (2013) SHM systems supporting extension of the structures’ service life. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(4):225–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Su JZ, Xia Y, Chen L et al (2013) Long-term structural performance monitoring system for the Shanghai Tower. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soman RN, Onoufrioua T, Kyriakidesb MA, Votsisc RA, Chrysostomou CZ (2014) Multi-type, multi-sensor placement optimization for structural health monitoring of long span bridges. Smart Struct Syst 14(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clemente P, De Stefano A (2016) Special issue on novel methods in SHM and monitoring of bridges: foreword. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(3):317–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quintana J, Carrion F, Crespo S, Bonilla V, Garnica P, Perez A (2015) SHM and evaluation of a continuous reinforced concrete pavement. In: 7th International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure SHMII-7, Torino, Italy, July 1–3

  7. Zhu HH, Ho AN, Yin JH, Sun HW, Pei HF, Hong CY (2012) An optical fibre monitoring system for evaluating the performance of a soil nailed slope. Smart Struct Syst 9(5):393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenzoni F, Casarin F, Modena C, Caldon M, Islami K, Da Porto F (2013) Structural health monitoring of the Roman Arena of Verona, Italy. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(4):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bukenya P, Moyo P, Beushausen H, Oosthuizen C (2014) Health monitoring of concrete dams: a literature review. J Civil Struct Health Monit 4(4):235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nikles M (2009) Long-distance fiber optic sensing solutions for pipeline leakage, intrusion, and ground movement detection. In: SPIE defense, security, and sensing. International society for optics and photonics, pp 731602–731602

  11. Giunta G, Dionigi F, Bassan A, Veneziani M, Bernasconi G, Del Giudice S, Rovett D, Schiavon R, Zanon F (2011) Third party interference and leak detection on buried pipelines for reliable transportation of fluids. In: Offshore mediterranean conference and exhibition. Offshore mediterranean conference

  12. Fritzen CP, Kraemer P, Klinkov M (2011). An integrated SHM approach for offshore wind energy plants. In: 28th IMAC, A conference on structural dynamics, vol 3, pp 727–740

  13. Bhattacharjee S, Roy P, Ghosh S, Misra S, Obaidat MS (2012) Wireless sensor network-based fire detection, alarming, monitoring and prevention system for Bord-and-Pillar coal mines. J Syst Softw 85(3):571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li HN, Ren L, Jia ZG, Yi TH, Li DS (2016) State-of-the-art in structural health monitoring of large and complex civil infrastructures. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spencer JR, Billie F et al (2016) Recent advances in wireless smart sensors for multi-scale monitoring and control of civil infrastructure. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(1):17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer BF, Ruiz-Sandoval ME, Kurata N (2004) Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges. Struct Control Health Monit 11(4):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsushita H, Yoshioka H, and Takahashi Y (2014) A study on vibration control method of building structures using macro fiber composites. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9057: active and passive smart structures and integrated systems 2014, 90571S, March 9

  18. Cahill P, O’Keeffe R, Jackson N, Mathewson A, Pakrashi V (2014) Structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete beam using piezoelectric energy harvesting system. In: EWSHM-7th European workshop on structural health monitoring

  19. Bao Y, Li H, Ou J (2014) Emerging data technology in structural health monitoring: compressive sensing technology. J Civil Struct Health Monit 4(2):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle JF (2002) Reconstructing dynamic events from time-limited spatially distributed data. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:2721–2734

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Carrion FJ, Doyle JF, Lozano A (2003) Structural health monitoring and damage detection using a sub-domain inverse method. Smart Mater Struct 12(5):776–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR, Czarnecki JJ (2004) A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fan W, Qiao P (2011) Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit 10(1):83–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stepinski T, Uhl T, Staszewski W (eds) (2013) Advanced structural damage detection: from theory to engineering applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang FL, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP, Tan ACC (2013) Damage diagnosis for complex steel truss bridges using multi-layer genetic algorithm. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(2):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun X, Sun X, He J, Hou G (2015) Bayesian-based structural damage detection on the integration of global and local information. Adv Struct Eng 18(4):543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng ZD, Lu ZR, Chen WH, Liu JK (2015) Structural damage identification based on power spectral density sensitivity analysis of dynamic responses. Comput Struct 146:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carrion FJ, Quintana JA, López JA (2011) Prognosis and reliability analysis of a stayed bridge using Monte Carlo simulation. In: 5th International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure SHMII-5, Cancún, México, Dec 11–15

  29. Fasl J, Helwig T, Wood SL (2013) Probabilistic method for estimating remaining fatigue life in steel bridges using measured strain data. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(4):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bu GP, Son JB, Lee JH, Guan H, Blumenstein M, Loo YC (2013) Typical deterministic and stochastic bridge deterioration modeling incorporating backward prediction model. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(2):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderegg P, Brönnimann R, Meier U (2014) Reliability of long-term monitoring data. J Civil Struct Health Monit 4(1):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Inaudi D (2011) Cost-benefits analysis in SHM projects, Keynote Lecture. In: 5th International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure SHMII-5, Cancún, Mexico, 11–15 Dec

  33. Thompson D (2013) The economic case for service life extension of structures using structural health monitoring based on the delayed cost of borrowing. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3(4):335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peelen WHA, Pijpers RJM, Jansen TH, and Geleven HFBF (2015) Technical and economic feasibility of structural integrity monitoring for fatigue life prediction of orthotropic bridge decks. In: 7th International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure SHMII-7, Torino, Italy, 1–3 July

  35. OECD (2015) Fostering investment in infrastructure. OECD Publication, Paris. Available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/Fostering-Investment-in-infrastructure.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sartori D, Catalano G, Genco M, Pancotti Ch, Sirtori E, Vignetti S, Del Bo Ch (2014) Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects—economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. DG Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission

  37. Independent Evaluation Group (2010) Cost-benefit analysis in world bank projects. The international bank for reconstruction and development. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  38. Carreño U (2013) Lineamientos para la elaboración y presentación de los análisis costo y beneficio de los programas y proyectos de inversión. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 30 de diciembre de 2013 (In Spanish)

  39. López J, Hernández B, Quintana J, Carrión F, Crespo S (2011) Design and configuration of a large scale bridge monitoring system for long term evaluation. In: 5th International conference on structural health monitoring on intelligent infrastructure (SHMII-5), Cancun, México, 11–15 Dec

  40. Arroyo JA, Aguerrebere R, and Torres G (2014) Costos de operación base de los vehículos representativos del transporte interurbano 2014. Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Publicación Técnica No. 407, Sanfandila, Qro., México (In Spanish)

  41. Archondo-Callao RS, Faiz A (1994) Estimating vehicle operating costs. World Bank Monograph, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  42. Torres G, Hernández S (2006) Propuesta metodológica para la estimación del valor del tiempo de los usuarios de la infraestructura carretera en México: El caso del transporte de pasajeros. Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Publicación Técnica No. 291, Sanfandila, Qro., México (In Spanish)

  43. Gwilliam KM (1997) The value of time in economic evaluation of transport projects: lessons from recent research. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cuevas AC, Mayoral E, Mendoza A (2011) Definición de indicadores de seguridad vial en la red carretera federal. Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Publicación Técnica No. 345, Sanfandila, Qro., México (In Spanish)

  45. Quintana JA, Carrion FJ, Crespo SE, Hernández JA, Gasca HM (2016) Economical assessment of the SHM system of the Rio Papaloapan Bridge. EWSHM 2016, Bilbao, Spain

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Sanfandila, Querétaro, Mexico

    Francisco J. Carrión, Juan A. Quintana & Saúl E. Crespo

Authors
  1. Francisco J. Carrión
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan A. Quintana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saúl E. Crespo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Carrión.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was financed by the Instituto Mexicano del Transporte (Project EE41-15).

Conflict of interest

All authors work for the Instituto Mexicano del Transporte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carrión, F.J., Quintana, J.A. & Crespo, S.E. Techno-economical and practical considerations for SHM systems. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7, 207–215 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0215-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0215-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation