Skip to main content
Log in

Adjustable hybrid resampling approach to computationally efficient probabilistic inference of structural damage based on vibration measurements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel Adjustable Hybrid Resampling (AHR) approach to deriving samples representing probabilistic distributions of unknown damage indexes through Bayesian inference based on vibration measurements. The AHR is motivated by the need for reducing computational cost in identifying damage in real-world structures and evaluating its associated uncertainties, and is developed through alternative implementation of two newly developed resampling processes—the reserved sample resampling (RSR) and the direct resampling (DR)—in the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) simulation for Bayesian inference. The AHR is able to rapidly identify important regions where samples highly populate, and have the capacity to transform samples to more optimal positions, achieving the desired trade-off between computational expense and accuracy in an adjustable manner controlled by decision-makers. The proposed AHR approach and its efficiency and accuracy are illustrated and examined through identification of damage in truss joints and members by using simulated measurements. The limitation of this study and future research direction in this regard is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck JL (1989) Statistical system identification of structures. In: Proceedings of international conference on structural safety and reliability, 1989. ASCE, pp 1395–1402

  2. Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124(4):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zuev KM, Beck JL Asymptotically independent Markov sampling: a new MCMC scheme for Bayesian inference. In: Vulnerability, uncertainty, and Risk@ sQuantification, mitigation, and management. ASCE, pp 2022–2031

  4. Collins JD, Hart GC, Haselman T, Kennedy B (1974) Statistical identification of structures. AIAA J 12(2):185–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Guan X, He J, Jha R, Liu Y (2012) An efficient analytical Bayesian method for reliability and system response updating based on Laplace and inverse first-order reliability computations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 97(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2013) Bayesian methodology for diagnosis uncertainty quantification and health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit 20(1):88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung SH, Beck JL (2009) Bayesian model updating using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters. J Eng Mech 135(4):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duane S, Kennedy AD, Pendleton BJ, Roweth D (1987) Hybrid monte carlo. Phys Lett B 195(2):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:721–741

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1):97–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hung CS, Bansal S (2013) A new gibbs-sampling based algorithm for Bayesian model updating of linear dynamic systems with incomplete complex modal data. In: Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, 2013

  12. Beck JL, Au S-K (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech 128(4):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Au S, Beck J (2003) Important sampling in high dimensions. Struct Saf 25(2):139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Katafygiotis LS, Yuen KV (2001) Bayesian spectral density approach for modal updating using ambient data. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 30(8):1103–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ching J, Chen Y-C (2007) Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging. J Eng Mech 133(7):816–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muto M, Beck JL (2008) Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation. J Vib Control 14(1–2):7–34

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Papadimitriou C, Papadioti D-C (2013) Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating. Comput Struct 126:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallina A, Krenn R, Scharringhausen M, Uhl T, Schäfer B (2014) Parameter identification of a planetary rover wheel-soil contact model via a Bayesian approach. J Field Robot 31(1):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng W, Yu Y (2012) Structural health monitoring of damages in steel truss bridge model under connection model uncertainties. In: Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, 2012

  20. Zheng W, Shen J, Wang J (2014) Improved computational framework for efficient probabilistic inference of damage in truss structures based on vibration measurements. In: Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, 2014

  21. Ntotsios E, Papadimitriou C, Panetsos P, Karaiskos G, Perros K, Perdikaris PC (2009) Bridge health monitoring system based on vibration measurements. Bull Earthq Eng 7(2):469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goller B, Beck J, Schueller G (2011) Evidence-based identification of weighting factors in Bayesian model updating using modal data. J Eng Mech 138(5):430–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Christodoulou K, Ntotsios E, Papadimitriou C, Panetsos P (2008) Structural model updating and prediction variability using Pareto optimal models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):138–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaynes E (1979) Concentration of distributions at entropy maxima. In: Jaynes ET (ed) Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics, p 315

  25. Rubin DB (1988) Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. Bayesian Stat 3(1):395–402

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Fearnhead P (1998) Sequential Monte Carlo methods in filter theory. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Casella G, Robert CP (1999) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Computers and Structures Inc. (2013) CSi Analysis Reference Manual, Berkeley, CA

  29. Rasmussen CE, Bernardo J, Bayarri M, Berger J, Dawid A, Heckerman D, Smith A, West M (2003) Gaussian processes to speed up hybrid Monte Carlo for expensive Bayesian integrals. Bayesian Stat 7:651–659

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge partial support from National Science Foundation under Award NSF/DUE-0837395. Any opinions, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency. The authors also thank Prof. Jianye Ching from National Taiwan University for providing Matlab codes of original transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, W., Shen, J. Adjustable hybrid resampling approach to computationally efficient probabilistic inference of structural damage based on vibration measurements. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6, 153–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0149-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0149-0

Keywords

Navigation