Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring of historical timber structures: state of the art and prospective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monitoring of timber structures grew up in the late 1980 in the United States for the evaluation of the structural safety of bridges. After some timber structures collapsed in Europe in the last decade, the monitoring becomes more important: nowadays, it is used not only for bridges, but also especially for new buildings’ monitoring. The monitoring of historical timber structures is realized, until today, at the minimum, simply recording the variation of temperature and humidity and/or repeating the on-site inspection. The on-site inspection is considered as the most powerful non-destructive tool for the assessment of timber structures, but it shows its implied limit: it takes a snapshot of the timber structure conditions in a specific moment. Otherwise, the remote monitoring used for new structures, based on recent technologies and solutions, offers the possibilities of a continuous monitoring, allowing to see the effects that all possible external factors have on the mechanical behaviour of the structure and on its state of conservation. Some of the solutions realized for the monitoring of new constructions can be extended to the old timber structures, taking into account the peculiarity of historical ones that require to be preserved and maintained in safety conditions, as part of the World Cultural Heritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruz H, Yeomans D, Tsakanika E et al (2013) Guidelines for the on-site assessment of historic timber structures. Int J Archit Herit. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.774070

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasal B, Anthony RW (2004) Advances in situ evaluation of timber structures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 6:94–103. doi:10.1002/pse.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tannert T, Dietsch P, Cestari CB, Kasal B (2012) Cost Action Fp1101—Assessment, Reinforcement And Monitoring Of Timber Structures. WCTE—World Conf. Timber Eng

  4. Frühwald E, Serrano E, Toratti T et al (2007) Design of safe timber structures—How can we learn from structural failures in concrete, steel and timber? Report TVBK-3053. Division of Structural Engineering, Lund University

  5. Bonamini G (1995) Restoring timber structures—inspection and evaluation. Lect. D3 Timber Eng. STEP 2—Des.—Details Struct. Syst. STEP/EUROFORTECH an Initiat. under EU Comett Program. 1st edn. pp D3/1–9

  6. Bonamini G, Noferi M, Togni M, Uzielli L (2001) Manuale del legno strutturale—Vol. I—Ispezione diagnosi in opera. Carlo Mancosu Editore, Rome

  7. Bonamini G, Noferi M, Togni M (2001) On-site grading of old timber members. In: Cestari CB (ed) Wooden Handwork/Wooden Carpentry Eur. Restor. Sites. Paris, pp 205–210

  8. Ross RJ, Brashaw BK, Wang X, et al. (2004) Wood and timber: condition assessment manual. Madison-Winsconsin

  9. Dietsch P, Köhler J (2011) Methods for the assessment of timber structures—Task Group Report—Cost Action E55 Modelling of performance of timber structures

  10. Bohumil K, Tannert T (2011) In situ assessment of structural timber. p 132

  11. Ceccotti A, Togni M (1996) NDT on ancient timber beams: assessment of strength/stiffness properties combining visual and instrumental methods. In: 10th International Symposium Nondestructive Testing of Wood

  12. Feio A, Lourenço P, Machado J (2007) Non-destructive evaluation of the mechanical behavior of chestnut wood in tension and compression parallel to grain. Int J Archit Herit 1:272–292. doi:10.1080/15583050701300475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Íñiguez G, Arriaga F, Esteban M, et al. (2010) In situ non-destructive density estimation for the assessment of existing timber structures. WCTE 2010—World Conf. Timber Eng

  14. Cavalli A, Togni M (2013) How to improve the on-site MOE assessment of old timber beams combining NDT and visual strength grading. J Nondestruct Test Eval. doi:10.1080/10589759.2013.764424

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sousa HS, Sørensen JD, Kirkegaard PH et al (2013) On the use of NDT data for reliability-based assessment of existing timber structures. Eng Struct 56:298–311. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. UNI 11119:2004 (2004) Cultural Heritage—wooden artefacts. Load-bearing structures. On site inspections for the diagnosis of timber members

  17. USDA Forest Service (1990) The timber bridge initiative, fiscal year 1990 status report

  18. Ritter MA, Geske EA, McCutcheon WJ, et al. (1991) Methods for assessing the field performance of stress-laminated timber bridges. In: International Timber Engineering Conference London, pp 319–326

  19. Wacker JP, Calil CJ (2004) Pennsylvania hardwood timber bridges: Field performance after 10 Years. In: American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ed) Proc. Structural Mater. Technol. Buffalo, New York, pp 222–227

  20. Wang X, Wacker JP, Morison AM, et al. (2005) Nondestructive assessment of single-span timber bridges using a vibration-based method. 17

  21. Tannert T, Berger R, Müller A (2011) Remote moisture monitoring of timber bridges: a case study. In: 5th International Conference on Structural Monitoring Intelligent Infrastructures. Cancùn, Mexico, pp 1–9

  22. Moore J, Patterson R (2009) How to stop the rot? Continuous monitoring of short span timber bridges. Institution of Engineers Australia NSW Regional Convention, Grafton, pp 163–170

  23. Kudela J (1996) Detection of stresses in wood by the reflection photoelasticity. In: 10th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of wood. p 401

  24. Jankowski LJ, Jasieńko J, Nowak TP (2010) Experimental assessment of CFRP reinforced wooden beams by 4-point bending tests and photoelastic coating technique. Mater Struct 43:141–150. doi:10.1617/s11527-009-9476-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oscarsson J, Olsson A, Enquist B (2010) Strain fields around a traversing edge knot in a spruce specimen exposed to tensile forces. WCTE 2010—World Conf. Timber Eng.—World Conf. Timber Eng

  26. Jeong GY (2008) Tensile properties of Loblolly Pine strands using digital image correlation and stochastic finite element method

  27. Meihua L, Dongai W (2011) Surface deformation measurements of a finger-joint timber by object-oriented technique and digital speckle image correlation. In: International Conference on Electrical Information and Control Engineering pp 3645–3648. doi:10.1109/ICEICE.2011.5777861

  28. Dubois F, Méité M, Pop O, Absi J (2012) Characterization of timber fracture using the digital image correlation technique and finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 96:107–121. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Henke K, Pawlowski R, Schregle P, Winter S (2012) Digital Image Processing in the Monitoring of Wide-span Timber Roof Structures. World Conf. Timber Eng. Auckland, pp 200–203

  30. Abels M (2011) Assessment matrix for timber structures—basics for standardized building checks. Bouwstenen Publicatieburo, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  31. Uzielli L, Cocchi L, Mazzanti P et al (2012) The deformometric kit: a method and an apparatus for monitoring the deformation of wooden panels. J Cult Herit 13:94–101. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Knight B, Thickett D (2007) Determination of response rates of wood objects to fluctuating humidity in historic properties. Mus Microclim National M pp 85–88

  33. Bratasz Ł, Kozłowski R, Camuffo D, Pagan E (2007) Impact of indoor heating on painted wood: monitoring the altarpiece in the church of Santa Maria Maddalena in Rocca Pietore, Italy. Stud Conserv 210:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goli G, Fioravanti M, Busoni S, et al. (2012) Measurement and modelling of mass and dimensional variations of historic violins subjected to thermo-hygrometric variations: The case study of the Guarneri “del Gesù” violin (1743) known as the “Cannone.”J Cult Herit 13:154–160. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2012.04.007

  35. Brischke C, Hansson EF (2011) Modeling biodegradation of timber—dose-response models for above-ground decay and its climate-dependent variability. In: Int Conf Struct Heal Assess Timber Struct

  36. Dietsch P, Gamper A, Merk M, Winter S (2012) Building climate—long-term measurements to determine the effect on the moisture gradient in large-span timber structures. In: Proc. Iternational Counc. Res. Innov. Build. Constr. Work. Comm. W18—Timber Struct. Meet. 45, Växjö, Sweden. pp 1–14

  37. N’Guyen TA, Angellier N, Caré S et al (2013) Approaches to the moisture content monitoring in timber elements: development of a resistive method. Adv Mater Res 778:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jorge L, Dias A (2013) X-Lam panels in swimming-pool building—monitoring the environment and the performance. Adv Mater Res 778:779–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Leicester RH (2001) Engineered durability for timber construction. Prog Struct Eng Mater 3(3):216–227

  40. Ribeiro D, Garrett JA, Duarte S, et al. (2012) Probability of damage in timber structures by monitoring of biological activity. ICDS12-Iternational Conf. Durable Struct. from Constr. to Rehabil

  41. Oliver-Villanueva JV, Abián-Pérez MA (2012) Advanced wireless sensors for termite detection in wood constructions. Wood Sci Technol 47:269–280. doi:10.1007/s00226-012-0485-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Doudak G, McClure G, Smith I et al (2005) Monitoring structural response of a wooden light-frame industrial shed building to environmental loads. J Struct Eng 131:794. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(794)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Morris H, Worth M, Omenzetter P (2011) Monitoring modern timber structures and connections. In: Int. Conf. Struct. Heal. Assess. Timber Struct

  44. Lanata F (2013) An on-going monitoring project of a new timber structure. Adv Mater Res 778:757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moore JC (2009) Monitoring timber beam bridges for structural health. Master of Resource Science Thesis

  46. Metelli G, Giurani E, Marchina E (2013) The repair of timber beams with controlled-debonding steel plates. Adv Mater Res 778:588–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Henriques MJ, Mateus PB, Palma P, Cruz H (2008) Modelling the bahaviour of a large span glulam arch of Atlantico Pavillon. In: 13 th Symp. Deform. Meas. Anal. Lisbon, pp 1–11

  48. Nadine D, Montaruli E (2008) Service life analysis of marine structures made of tropical hardwoods. WCTE—world Conf. Timber Eng. Miyazaki, Japan, pp 258–265

  49. ENV 1995-2 Eurocode 5—Design of timber structure

  50. Branco JM, Cruz PJS, Piazza M, Varum H (2008) Procedures field load tests on a Queen-post timber truss. In: Sixth Int. Conf. Struct. Anal. Hist. Constr. Bath, pp 507–514

  51. Munafò P, Grilli M (2005) Il rispetto del costrutto salvaguardando i cinematismi originari di rottura. Conserv. Hist. wooden Struct. Florence, Italy, pp 51–62

  52. Cavalli A, Togni M (2013) The influence of routed grooves on the bending behavior of old timber beams. Adv Mater Res 778:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. ICOMOS (1999) Principles for the preservation of historic timber structures

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Systems, GESAAF, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Alberto Cavalli & Marco Togni

Authors
  1. Alberto Cavalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Togni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Cavalli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavalli, A., Togni, M. Monitoring of historical timber structures: state of the art and prospective. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5, 107–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-014-0081-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-014-0081-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation