Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Time-aware analysis and ranking of lurkers in social networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mining the silent members of an online community, also called lurkers, has been recognized as an important problem that accompanies the extensive use of online social networks (OSNs). Existing solutions to the ranking of lurkers can aid understanding the lurking behaviors in an OSN. However, they are limited to use only structural properties of the static network graph, thus ignoring any relevant information concerning the time dimension. Our goal in this work is to push forward research in lurker mining in a twofold manner: (1) to provide an in-depth analysis of temporal aspects that aims to unveil the behavior of lurkers and their relations with other users, and (2) to enhance existing methods for ranking lurkers by integrating different time-aware properties concerning information production and information consumption actions. Network analysis and ranking evaluation performed on Flickr, FriendFeed and Instagram networks allowed us to draw interesting remarks on both the understanding of lurking dynamics and on transient and cumulative scenarios of time-aware ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that, for the sake of simplicity, we have omitted the subscript T in the freshness and activity trend functions, in the weighting function as well as in the in and out functions, since the reference interval of interest T is assumed clear from the context. Analogously, we override the function symbols \(\mathcal {L}_{\text {in}}(v)\) and \(\mathcal {L}_{\text {out}}(v)\) given in Eq. (1), since they will be never referenced out of the Ts-LR setting.

  2. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Mfuzz.html.

  3. http://radimrehurek.com/gensim/.

References

  • Abdi H (2007) The Kendall rank correlation coefficient. In: Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics

  • Allaho MY, Lee W (2013) Analyzing the social ties and structure of contributors in open source software community. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 56–60 (2013)

  • Allaho MY, Lee W (2014) Increasing the responsiveness of recommended expert collaborators for online open projects. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), pp 749–758

  • Arnaboldi V, Conti M, Passarella A, Dunbar R (2013) Dynamics of personal social relationships in online social networks: a study on twitter. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on online social networks (COSN), pp 15–26

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevenuto F, Rodrigues T, Cha M, Almeida V (2012) Characterizing user navigation and interactions in online social networks. Inf Sci 195:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberich K, Vazirgiannis M, Weikum G (2005) Time-aware authority ranking. Int Math 2(3):301–332

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berlingerio M, Coscia M, Giannotti F, Monreale A, Pedreschi D (2013) Evolving networks: eras and turning points. Intell Data Anal 17(1):27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein MS, Bakshy E, Burke M, Karrer B (2013) Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), pp 21–30

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(4–5):993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Budak C, Agrawal D, El Abbadi A (2011) Structural trend analysis for online social networks. Proc VLDB Endow 4(10):646–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke M, Marlow C, Lento T (2009) Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), pp 945–954

  • Burke M, Marlow C, Lento T (2010) Social network activity and social well-being. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), pp 1909–1912

  • Capocci A, Servedio VDP, Colaiori F, Buriol LS, Donato D, Leonardi S, Caldarelli G (2006) Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the internet encyclopedia Wikipedia. Phys Rev, E 74

  • Caravelli P, Wei Y, Subak D, Singh L, Mann J (2013) Understanding evolving group structures in time-varying networks. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 142–148

  • Celli F, Lascio FMLD, Magnani M, Pacelli B, Rossi L (2010) Social network data and practices: the case of friendfeed. In: Proceedings of internatinal conference on social computing, behavioral modeling, and prediction (SBP), pp 346–353

  • Cha M, Mislove A, Gummadi KP (2009) A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the Flickr social Network. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp 721–730

  • Chatterjee P, Hoffman DL, Novak TP (2003) Modeling the clickstream: implications for web-based advertising efforts. Market Sci 22(4):520–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen FC, Chang HM (2011) Do lurking learners contribute less? A knowledge co-construction perspective. In: Proceedings of conference on communities and technologies (C&T), pp 169–178

  • Cranefield J, Yoong P, Huff SL (2011) Beyond Lurking: the invisible follower-feeder in an online community ecosystem. In: Proceedings of Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS), p 50

  • De Meo P, Ferrara E, Abel F, Aroyo L, Houben GJ (2013) Analyzing user behavior across social sharing environments. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol, 5(1)

  • Edelmann N (2013) Reviewing the definitions of “lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 16(9):645–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagin R, Kumar R, Sivakumar D (2003) Comparing top k lists. SIAM J Discret Math 17(1):134–160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fazeen M, Dantu R, Guturu P (2011) Identification of leaders, lurkers, associates and spammers in a social network: context-dependent and context-independent approaches. Soc Netw Anal Min 1(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara E, Interdonato R, Tagarelli A (2014) Online popularity and topical interests through the lens of Instagram. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on hypertext and social media (HT), pp 24–34

  • Gao S, Ma J, Chen Z (2015)Modeling and predicting retweeting dynamics on microblogging platforms. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on web search and web data mining (WSDM), pp 107–116

  • Garcia D, Mavrodiev P, Schweitzer F (2013) Social resilience in online communities: the autopsy of friendster. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on online social networks (COSN), pp 39–50

  • Gullo F, Ponti G, Tagarelli A, Greco S (2009) A time series representation model for accurate and fast similarity detection. Pattern Recogn 42(11):2998–3014

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Halfaker A, Keyes O, Taraborelli D (2013) Making peripheral participation legitimate: reader engagement experiments in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative Work (CSCW), pp 849–860

  • Hu B, Song Z, Ester M (2014) Topic modeling in online social media, user features, and social networks for. In: Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining, pp 2178–2191

  • Jeong H, Néda Z, Barabási AL (2003) Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks. EPL Europhys Lett 61(4):567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Wilson C, Wang X, Sha W, Huang P, Dai Y, Zhao BY (2013) Understanding latent interactions in online social networks. ACM Trans Web 7(4):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan A, Atkin D (2014) Individual differences in social networking site users: the interplay between antecedents and consequential effect on level of activity. Comput Hum Behav 40:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A (2006) Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD), pp 611–617

  • Kunegis J, Blattner M, Moser C (2013) Preferential attachment in online networks: measurement and explanations. In: Proceedings of ACM web science conference (WebSci), pp 205–214

  • Lang J, Wu SF (2013) Social network user lifetime. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(3):285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ, Cattuto C (2012) Dynamical classes of collective attention in Twitter. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp 251–260

  • Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD), ACM, pp 497–506

  • López C, Farzan R, Brusilovsky P (2012) Personalized incremental users’ engagement: driving contributions one step forward. In: Proceedings of ACM international conference on support group work (GROUP), pp 189–198

  • Macropol K, Bogdanov P, Singh AK, Petzold LR, Yan X (2013) I act, therefore I judge: network sentiment dynamics based on user activity change. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 396–402

  • Malliaros FD, Vazirgiannis M (2013) To stay or not to stay: modeling engagement dynamics in social graphs. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), pp 469–478

  • Mislove A, Koppula HS, Gummadi PK, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee B (2008) Growth of the Flickr social network. In: Proceddings of the first workshop on online social networks (WOSN), pp 25–30

  • Muller, M.: Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In: Proceedigns of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative Work (CSCW), pp 253–256

  • Narang K, Nagar S, Mehta S, Subramaniam LV, Dey K (2013) Discovery and analysis of evolving topical social discussions on unstructured microblogs. In: Proceedings of European conference on advances in information retrieval (ECIR), pp 545–556

  • Nonnecke B, Preece JJ (2000) Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), pp 73–80

  • O’Madadhain J, Smyth P (2005) EventRank: a framework for ranking time-varying networks. In: Proceedings of KDD workshop on link discovery, pp 9–16

  • On B, Lim E, Jiang J, Teow L (2013) Engagingness and responsiveness behavior models on the enron email network and its application to email reply order prediction. In: The influence of technology on social network analysis and mining, pp 227–253

  • Pan Z, Lu Y, Gupta S (2014) How heterogeneous community engage newcomers? The effect of community diversity on newcomers’ perception of inclusion: An empirical study in social media service. Comput Hum Behav 39:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece JJ, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Comput Hum Behav 20(2):201–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Sindhwani V (2012) Learning evolving and emerging topics in social media: a dynamic NMF approach with temporal regularization. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on web search and web data mining (WSDM), pp 693–702

  • Schneider A, von Krogh G, Jager P (2013) “What’s coming next?” Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Comput Hum Behav 29:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwämmle V, Jensen ON (2010) A simple and fast method to determine the parameters for fuzzy c-means cluster analysis. Bioinformatics 26(22):2841–2848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka V, Rafaeli S (2006) Invisible participants: how cultural capital relates to lurking behavior. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on world wide web (WWW), pp 163–172

  • Sun N, Rau PPL, Ma L (2014) Understanding lurkers in online communities: a literature review. Comput Hum Behav 38:110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2013) Who’s out there? Identifying and ranking lurkers in social networks. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 215–222

  • Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2014a) Lurking in social networks: topology-based analysis and ranking methods. Soc Netw Anal Min 4(230):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2014b) Understanding lurking behaviors in social networks across time. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 51–55

  • Tsai H, Pai P (2014) Why do newcomers participate in virtual communities? An integration of self-determination and relationship management theories. Dec Support Syst 57:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, Liao V, Pirolli P, Nelson L, Strohmaier M (2012) It’s not in their tweets: modeling topical expertise of twitter users. In: Proceedings of international conference on social computing (SocialCom), pp 91–100

  • Wang G, Gill K, Mohanlal M, Zheng H, Zhao BY (2013) Wisdom in the social crowd: an analysis of Quora. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on world wide web (WWW), pp 1341–1352

  • Wilson C, Sala A, Puttaswamy KPN, Zhao BY (2012) Beyond social graphs: user interactions in online social networks and their implications. ACM Trans Web 6(4):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Lee D, Yan S (2013) Steeler nation, 12th man, and boo birds: classifying Twitter user interests using time series. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 684–691

  • Yu PS, Li X, Liu B (2004) On the temporal dimension of search. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on world wide web (WWW), pp 448–449

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer, Modeling, Electronics, and Systems Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy

    Andrea Tagarelli & Roberto Interdonato

Authors
  1. Andrea Tagarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Interdonato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Tagarelli.

Additional information

An abridged version of this paper appeared in Tagarelli and Interdonato (2014b).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tagarelli, A., Interdonato, R. Time-aware analysis and ranking of lurkers in social networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 5, 46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0276-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0276-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation