Introduction

Global trend in diesel sulfur limit is towards 10–15 ppm levels, which is required to adopt advanced pollution control technologies. With increase in heavy/sour crude production, the requirement for deep desulfurization will increase all over the world, especially in fast growing regions of Asia–Pacific and Middle East. Advanced processes/catalysts are required to meet the specifications and increasing demands of ultra-low sulfur diesel [5, 15]. Ultra-low sulfur levels (10–15 ppm) can be achieved by deep hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of middle distillate streams. Many factors such as the catalysts, process parameters, and feedstock quality have a significant influence on the degree of desulfurization of diesel feeds.

Detailed analysis of gas oils obtained from Arabian Light (AL-GO), Arabian Medium (AM-GO) and Arabian Heavy (AH-GO) crude oils in terms of reactive and refractory sulfur, nitrogen, as well as aromatic species has been reported [7]. The sulfur, nitrogen and aromatic contents were considerably higher in AH-GO as presented in Table 1. Refractory sulfur and the alkyl-carbazole content in the AH-GO, which are significantly (3–4 times) higher than that in AL-GO, hinders the deep HDS of AH-GO. Major sulfur species were alkyl-benzothiophenes (alkyl- BTs) comprising C2-C5 alkyl chain, dibenzothiophene (DBT), as well as the considerable amounts of alkyl-DBTs, such as 4-DBT, 4,6- DMDBT and 4,6,x-TMDBT. AH-GO contained the largest amount of alkyl-DBTs with two or more alkyl carbon atoms, which are the refractory sulfur species. The results also show presence of significantly higher nitrogen content in AH-GO, which are mainly alkyl-carbazoles.

Table 1 Aromatics, sulfur and nitrogen species in arabian gas oils [7]

The conventional HDS process is usually conducted over sulfided CoMo/γ-Al2O3 or NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. A variety of metal contents, promoters, support properties, etc., have been studied and used for the development of versatile deep HDS catalyst system. Despite their robust nature, conventional catalysts, however, do not have sufficient activity to desulfurize diesel feed streams to ultra-low sulfur levels under normal operating conditions. They require severe operating conditions such as high temperature, low space velocity and high hydrogen partial pressure. Such severe processing conditions generally lead to rapid catalyst deactivation, shorter cycle lengths and reduced throughput.

Hence, the development and application of highly active and stable catalysts are among the most desired options for reducing the sulfur content of diesel to ultra-low levels by deep desulfurization. Substantial improvement in catalyst activity is necessary when the sulfur content is to be reduced to ultra-low levels (<15 ppm). This was achieved by one or more of the following approaches: (a) nature of active species; (b) support choice and modification; and (c) preparation procedures. Intensive efforts have been devoted to develop highly active hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts [15].

The paper highlights the results from some of the recent studies conducted at the Center for Refining and Petrochemicals of the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) to develop improved HDS catalysts. The studies covered include (a) effect of Co/(Co + Mo) ratio in CoMo/Al2O3 catalysts on HDS pathways of benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene; (b) role of phosphorus addition on simultaneous HDS of dibenzothiophene and alkyl dibenzothiophenes over CoMo/Al2O3 catalysts; and (c) deep HDS of gas oil over NiMo catalysts supported on Al2O3-Zr2O3 composites.

Effect of Co/(Co + Mo) ratio in Como/γ-Al2O3 catalysts on HDS pathways

The HDS of dibenzothiophenes generally takes place by two routes: (a) a hydrogenation (HYD) pathway involving aromatic ring hydrogenation, followed by C–S bond cleavage; and (b) a direct desulfurization (DDS) or hydrogenolysis pathway via direct C–S bond cleavage without aromatic ring hydrogenation [13]. The direct desulfurization route is favorable as it consumes less H2, making this route more economical. Therefore, many researchers have focused their research to enhance the DDS selectivity [8, 14, 17].

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of Co/(Co + Mo) ratio on the HDS of benzothiophene (BT) and dibenzothiophene (DBT). The study covered overall HDS as well the DDS and HYD pathways for HDS [1].

Catalyst preparation and evaluation

A series of CoMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts was prepared with Co/(Co + Mo) ratio of 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 while maintaining a total metal oxide content of 19 wt %. For the sake of simplicity, the catalysts were denoted as aCM, in which a represents ten times the Co/(Co + Mo) molar ratio. The catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation of (NH4)6Mo7O24∙4H2O and Co(NO3)2∙6H2O on calcined γ-Al2O3 at room temperature. The actual MoO3 loadings were 15.4, 14.0 and 12.4 wt % for 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The surface areas of 3, 4 and 5 catalysts were 166, 155, 146 m2/g whereas their pore volumes were 0.33, 0.28 and 0.24 ml/g, respectively. The oxide catalysts were sulfided prior to their performance tests by light kerosene spiked with dimethyl disulfide (2.5 wt % sulfur) in a tubular reactor under flowing hydrogen (7.5 NL/h) at 750 psig and 593 K for 16 h.

The catalysts were tested in a 100 ml batch autoclave reactor which was loaded with 50 g decalin and 0.105 g of BT and 0.144 g of DBT. Hence, the model compounds contributed 500 ppm each of sulfur content, which resulted in a total sulfur content of 1,000 ppm in the feed. Half a gram of fresh catalyst was used for each experiment, which amounted to a catalyst-to-feedstock ratio of 1 wt %. Experiments were carried out for 2 h under a hydrogen pressure (6.1 MPa) and at 573, 598 and 623 K. The product samples taken during the course of the experimental run were analyzed by gas chromatograph equipped with sulfur chemiluminscence detector (GC-SCD).

Results and discussion

HDS kinetics BT and DBT were determined by assuming a pseudo first-order reaction and the results are summarized in Table 2 [1]. Comparison of first-order rate constants obtained at different temperatures and catalysts provides information about the effectiveness of cobalt addition on BT and DBT desulfurization. The HDS rate of BT was much higher than DBT, especially at lower temperature. However, the HDS of DBT was more sensitive to Co/(Co + Mo) ratio than the HDS of BT. Overall HDS rates of BT and DBT were higher over 4CM catalyst than either 3CM or 5CM. Activation energies of the HDS of DBT were 3–4 times higher than the HDS of BT. Lowest activation energy for DBT was for 4CM.

Table 2 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and activation energies for the HDS of BT and DBT [1]

HDS of DBT takes place via direct desulfurization (DDS) and/or Hydrogenation (HYD) routes. Cyclohexyl benzene content was almost same for products obtained over all catalysts indicating no influence of Co/(Co + Mo) ratio on the HYD route. Biphenyl content was highest over 4CM which signifies that DDS is enhanced when the Co/(Co + Mo) ratio is 0.4.

The results of this study have clearly demonstrated that Co/Co + Mo ratio has significant influence on the overall HDS of BT and DBT as well as on the DDS pathway, but showed no influence on the HYD pathway. A Co/Co + Mo ratio of 0.4 was found to be optimum for both overall HDS as well as the HDS by DDS pathway.

Role of P addition on simultaneous HDS of DBT and alkyl DBTs over CoMo/Al2O3 catalysts

Previous studies have shown that modification of HDS catalysts by acidic species, such as phosphorus, improves the activities of Mo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts [9, 10]. However, most of the earlier studies focused on influence of phosphorus on HDS catalysts using single model compound. In the present study, simultaneous HDS of DBT and 4-methyl dibenzothiophene (4-MDBT) as well as DBT and 4,6-DMDBT were studied over a series of phosphorus promoted CoMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with the aim of investigating the effect of phosphorus addition on simultaneous HDS reactions. The study covered overall HDS as well as the DDS and HYD pathways for HDS [3].

Catalyst preparation and evaluation

A series of catalysts was prepared in which the total metal oxide (MoO3 + CoO) content was kept constant at 19.0 wt % with a Co/(Co + Mo) ratio of 0.4. γ-alumina support was modified by addition of 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 wt % of P2O5 before impregnation of the active metals. The catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation of ammonium heptamolybedate tetrahydrate and cobalt nitrate heaxahydrate on calcined γ-alumina at room temperature. The catalysts were then dried at 373 K for 12 h followed by calcination at 773 K for 1 h. The catalysts were denoted as CMP(a), in which a represents P2O5 content in wt %.

Figure 1 shows the pore size distribution of phosphorus modified and unmodified catalysts. Phosphate is adsorbed on the walls of the pores and blocks small pores initially resulting in stronger reduction in pore volume (up to 35 %) than surface area (up to 26 %). The apparent average size of unblocked pores increases due to phosphate adsorption. However, in reality, there was slight decrease in pore size that was originally present in CMP(0) catalyst due to adsorption of P2O5. This phenomenon results in decrease in surface area, pore volume and average pore size with increase in P2O5 content.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pore-size distribution of CMP catalysts [3]. (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier)

Catalyst evaluation procedures used were similar to those presented in Sect. 2.1. Two sets of experiments: (a) DBT and 4-MDBT; and (b) DBT and 4,6-DMDBT were carried out. The quantities of model compounds added in the decalin feedstock were controlled so that each model compound contributed 500 ppm of sulfur in the feedstock.

Results and discussion

X-ray diffraction patterns of γ-Al2O3 and CMP catalysts show that the crystallinity of CoMoO4 phase increased with P addition. It also resulted in increased dispersion of MoO3 phase, which is catalytically active phase. Modification of CoMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts by addition of phosphorus strongly increased the HDS activity and the maximum activity enhancement was achieved with 1.0 wt % P2O5. However, further increase in phosphorus content reduces the activity which may be due to enhanced CoMoO4 formation, as noticed from XRD results, causing loss of Mo dispersion and formation of relatively stable Co-Mo-P compounds.

Comparison of reaction rates for DDS and HYD pathways provide an insight into the reactivities of model compounds and effect of phosphorus addition on catalyst. In the simultaneous HDS of DBT and 4-MDBT both molecules mainly react by the DDS pathway and thus compete for the same DDS sites (Fig. 2). However, in the case of simultaneous HDS of DBT and 4,6-DMDBT, the latter preferably reacts over the HYD sites, while DBT reacts mainly over DDS sites (Fig. 3). Thus, DBT faces less competition from 4,6-DMDBT than from 4-MDBT for the DDS sites resulting in higher conversion of DBT in the presence of 4,6-DMDBT than 4-MDBT.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Product distribution during simultaneous HDS of DBT and 4-MDBT over CMP(0) and CMP(1) catalysts at 623 K [3]. (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Product distribution during simultaneous HDS of DBT and 4,6-DMDBT over CMP(0) and CMP(1) catalysts at 623 K [3] (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier)

Figure 4 summarizes the enhancement in catalyst activity due to addition of 1 wt % P2O5 by DDS and HYD pathways as well as the overall HDS at 623 K. The results show that about 90 % enhancement in HDS of DBT and 4-MDBT was via DDS route. This is in contrast to about 47 % enhancement in 4,6-DMDBT enhancement was via DDS route. On the absolute basis, however, the overall enhancement in HDS rates by phosphorus addition was in the following order: 4,6-DMDBT (51 %) >4-MDBT (38 %) >DBT (26 %). Incidentally, steric hindrance by methyl substituents also increases in the same order. Since 4,6-DMDBT is one of the most refractive sulfur compound in the diesel fuel, enhancement in its HDS rate by about 50 % by phosphorus addition will substantially contribute in achieving the 10–15 ppm sulfur level.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Enhancement in HDS rates at 623 K due to addition of 1 wt % P2O5 [3] (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier)

Deep HDS of gas oil over nimo catalysts supported on Alumina–Zirconia composites

Alumina is the most widely used support material in HDS catalysts because it is highly stable, contains acidic and basic sites, has reasonably high surface area and porosity, can be easily formed into desired shapes, and is relatively inexpensive. However, alumina undergoes a direct interaction with the active metal species, and has an indirect role in determining the promotional effects of the secondary metal species. These effects have generated an immense interest in new supports for deep HDS catalysts, such as TiO2, ZrO2, MgO, C, SiO2, zeolites, etc. [6], [11], [12] [16]). Our study focused on the synthesis and characterization of a series of ZrO2-Al2O3 composite oxides containing 0–10 wt % ZrO2 [2].

Catalyst preparation, characterization and evaluation

A series of ZrO2-Al2O3 composite supports having a ZrO2 content of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 wt % were prepared. Zirconium(IV) oxynitrate hydrate [ZrO(NO3)2xH2O] (99 %), ammonium heptamolybdate pentahydrate [(NH4)6Mo7O245H2O] (99.98 %), and nickel(II) nitrate nonahydrate [Ni(NO3)29H2O] (98.5 %) were used as sources of zirconium, molybdenum and nickel, respectively. The composite supports were synthesized by peptizing Al2O3 together with ZrO(NO3)2xH2O. Typical synthesis procedure involved dispersion of 40.0 g AlO(OH)H2O in 200 ml deionized water at 70 °C while stirring for 3 h followed by addition of 105 ml aqueous solution of ZrO(NO3)2xH2O. The concentration of ZrO(NO3)2xH2O was controlled in order to achieve ZrO2 contents of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 wt %. An aqueous solution containing Mo, Ni and citric acid in molar ratio of 1:0.4:1, respectively, was used to impregnate the supports with a loading of 18 wt % MoO3 by pore-volume impregnation. The catalysts are referred to as NMAZ-0, NMAZ-2.5, NMAZ-5, and NMAZ-10, where the numbers denote the percentage of ZrO2 content.

X-ray diffraction analysis of the supports was carried out on a Siemens-D5005® diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation under 40 kV, 40 mA, and scan range from 10° to 80°. UV–Visible diffuse reflectance experiments were performed on a Thermo Evolution-600® high-performance spectrophotometer. A Quantachrome Autosorb-1C® system was used for temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) of supports. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was conducted on the catalysts after calcination in air at 550 °C for 3 h. The composition of metals in the ZrO2-Al2O3 supports was quantitatively verified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Catalytic activity for the HDS of gas oil was determined in a fixed-bed flow reaction system using gas oil feed (S content = 10,000 ppm) which was obtained from a local refinery. The tubular reactor (ID = 1.5 cm; L = 74 cm) was loaded with 10 ml of uncalcined catalyst as pellets of size between 0.50 and 0.85 mm. Prior to performance testing, the catalyst was presulfided in situ using white kerosene mixed with dimethyl disulfide (S content = 2.5 wt %). The performance of catalysts was evaluated at 320, 340 and 360 °C while the LHSV (1.0 h−1), H2 pressure (6 MPa) and H2 flow rate (250 Nm3/m3) were kept constant. Total sulfur content in the feed and product was determined by pyro-fluorescence detection method using Antek 7000S analyzer. The boiling-range distribution was determined by simulated distillation using Agilent GC 3800.

Results and discussion

X-ray diffraction patterns indicate homogenous dispersion of 2.5–10 wt % of ZrO2 in bulk Al2O3. Mono-modal pore-size distribution—decrease in pore-size with increasing ZrO2 content. NH3-TPD results show that incorporation of 5 wt % or more ZrO2 neutralized the weak acid sites of Al2O3 and generated a different type of stronger acid sites. UV–Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy shows the presence of tetrahedral and octahedral Mo6+ ions species. An increase in octahedral species with addition of ZrO2 was observed, possibly due to weaker interaction of active metals on composite support. This result is also supported by H2-TPR measurements.

Acidity of the composite catalysts was assessed by NH3-TPD and the results are presented in Table 3. It seems that the presence of 2.5 % ZrO2 has neutralized the strong acid sites on the Al2O3 supported catalyst and at the same time generated greater density of the weak ones. However, the density and strength of the strong acid sites increased in the 10 % ZrO2 supported catalyst. It could be postulated that the presence of ZrO2 has initially neutralized the strong acid sites, but upon further addition of ZrO2, stronger acid sites have evolved for the catalyst containing 10 % ZrO2. The exact nature of these acid sites, however, could not be identified in this study.

Table 3 NH3-TPD results of the of NiMo/Al2O3- ZrO2 Catalysts [2]

Deep desulfurization of gas oil, carried out in a bench-scale flow reactor at 320, 340 and 360 °C, indicate that the addition of ZrO2 increased the catalytic activity—especially at higher temperature. The results are summarized in Table 4. Compared to Al2O3-based catalyst, the 1.5 order HDS rate constant was about 1.3, 1.8 and 2.5 times higher for catalysts containing 2.5, 5 and 10 wt % ZrO2, respectively. Apparent activation energies were found to be in the range of 32–36 kcal/mole, which are comparable to the reported values [4].

Table 4 Performance evaluation results of NiMo/Al2O3- ZrO2 catalysts [2]

These trends confirm the results of H2-TPD characterization that the addition of ZrO2 reduces the interaction between Al2O3 support and the active metals, and led to the formation of the easily reduced Mo species, which formed more active sites. A correlation was also found between the enhancement of hydrogenation activity of sulfided catalysts and the reducibility of their oxide precursors, as determined by the amount of hydrogen consumed in TPR experiments followed by mass spectroscopy. The hydrogen consumption increased with increase in ZrO2 content indicating enhanced hydrogenation activity. This is perhaps the only major drawback of the incorporation of ZrO2 in the composite support.

Concluding remarks

It has been demonstrated that development of deep HDS catalysts with improved performance can be achieved by different approaches:

  1. (1)

    Incorporation of proper ratio of active metals effects DDS route of HDS. Highest DDS activity was observed at Co/(Co + Mo) ratio of 0.4. Since the total metal oxide content is fixed at 19 wt %, higher Co content reduces Mo content and the catalytic activity. Lower Co content, on the other hand, results in not enough promotion of Mo catalytic activity.

  2. (2)

    Addition of P2O5 as a second promoter weakens the interaction between Mo and γ-Al2O3 resulting in increased dispersion of MoS2 particles. Maximum activity enhancement was achieved with 1.0 wt % P2O5. However, further increase in phosphorus content reduces the activity which may be due to enhanced CoMoO4 formation causing loss of Mo dispersion.

  3. (3)

    Application of ZrO3-Al2O3 composite support reduces the interaction between Al2O3 support and the active metals, and led to the formation of the easily reduced Mo species, which formed more active sites. A correlation was found between the enhancement of hydrogenation activity of sulfided catalysts and the reducibility of their oxide precursors.

These studies have contributed in increasing the understanding of scientific reasons for achieving improved performance of deep HDS catalysts. Among the different approaches studied, it is difficult to identify a single most-effective method of catalyst improvement. It seems that several approaches need to be applied simultaneously to achieve the highest performing deep HDS catalysts.