Skip to main content
Log in

Sticky Dots and Lion Adventures Playing a Part in Preschool Documentation Practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines how material objects such as photographs, papers and computers influence documentation practices in a Swedish preschool. The importance of teacher documentation is emphasized in the 2010 revised Swedish preschool curriculum as a means of evaluating preschool quality. However, the curriculum gives no specific guidelines about documentation. A quality audit has found that teachers are unsure about how to document their practices and records. The curriculum also requires children’s participation in documentation. This research uses video-recordings from two groups of children in one Swedish preschool to analyse teachers’ documentation practices with children. The video-recordings were analysed, combining theories of power relations with post-humanism. This article reviews two documentation activities: pedagogical documentation and evaluation documentation. The findings indicate that the complexity of preschool documentation, as described in earlier research, is increased when materials and participants are taken into account by the intra-actions of entities such as teachers, children, photographs and colour-coded labels (sticky dots). The manner in which the teacher and the children were able to negotiate a narrative was conditioned by the photographs and the colour-coded labels that teachers used to evaluate the documentation and which were given quite different meanings by the children.

Résumé

Cet article examine la manière dont les objets matériels tels que photos, papiers et ordinateurs influencent les pratiques de documentation dans une école maternelle Suédoise. L’importance de la documentation du professeur est mise en valeur dans le programme préscolaire Suédois révisé de 2010 en tant que moyen d’évaluation de la qualité de l’école maternelle. Cependant, le programme ne fournit pas de directives spécifiques sur la documentation. Un audit de qualité a prouvé que les professeurs nesont pas sûrs de la manière de documenter leurs pratiques et dossiers. Le programme exige également la participation des enfants dans la documentation. Cette recherche utilise des vidéo-enregistrements provenant de deux groupes d’enfants dans une école maternelle Suédoise afin d’analyser les pratiques de documentation du professeur avec les enfants. Les vidéo-enregistrements ont été analysés, en associant des théories de relations de pouvoir au post-humanisme. Cet article examine deux activités de documentation, la documentation pédagogique et la documentation d’évaluation. Les résultats indiquent que la complexité de la documentation de l’école maternelle, telle que décrite dans une recherche précédente, est accrue quand les matériels et participants sont pris en compte par les intra-actions d’entités telles que professeurs, enfants, photos et étiquettes à code couleur (pastilles collantes). La manière dont le professeur et les enfants ont pu négocier un récit a été conditionnée par les photos et les étiquettes à code couleur que les professeurs ont utilisées pour évaluer la documentation et pour lesquelles les enfants ont donné des significations assez différentes.

Resumen

Este artículo examina de qué manera objetos materiales, como fotos, documentos y ordenadores, influyen en las prácticas de documentación en una escuela de preescolar sueca. La importancia de la documentación para profesores se destaca en el programa sobre preescolar revisado en 2010 como un medio para evaluar la calidad de la educación preescolar. No obstante, el programa no da directrices específicas sobre la documentación. Una auditoría de calidad ha detectado que los profesores no están seguros de cómo documentar sus prácticas y registros. El plan de estudios también requiere la participación de los niños en la documentación. Esta investigación utiliza registros de vídeo de dos grupos de niños de una escuela de preescolar sueca para analizar las prácticas de documentación de los profesores con niños. Se analizaron las grabaciones de vídeo combinando las teorías de las relaciones de poder con el posthumanismo. Este artículo examina dos actividades de documentación: documentación pedagógica y documentación de evaluación. Los resultados indican que la complejidad de la documentación sobre educación preescolar, tal como se describe en una investigación anterior, es mayor cuando en las interacciones de entidades como profesores, niños, fotos y etiquetas con códigos de colores (puntos adhesivos), se tienen en cuenta los materiales y los participantes. La manera en que el profesor y los niños fueron capaces de negociar un relato estuvo condicionada por las fotos y las etiquetas con códigos de colores que los profesores utilizaron para evaluar la documentación y a las que los niños otorgaron significados muy diferentes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åsén, G., & Vallberg-Roth, A.-C. (2012). Utvärdering i förskolan—en forskningsöversikt. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bjervås, L.-L. (2011). Samtal om barn och pedagogisk dokumentation som bedömningspraktik i förskolan. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. K. (1997). What is a “document”? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 804–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecconi, L., Stegelin, D. A., Pintus, A., & Allegri, R. (2014). Utilizing a global environmental assessment tool to facilitate professional development: The voices of kindergarten teachers in Italy. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2), 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 87–104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2008). Foucault, power and participation. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(3), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 1–52). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, B. (2003). Stimulated recall. Några anteckningar om en metod att generera. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 8(3), 145–157.

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2000). Emancipation och motstånd. Stockholm: HLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz Taguchi, H., & Palmer, A. (2013). A more ‘livable’ school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments. Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, A.-L. (2012). Ethical issues in pedagogical documentation: Representations of children through digital technology. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowledge in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. (2012). Uppföljning, utvärdering och utveckling. Stockholm: Skolverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S., Williams, P., & Sandberg, A. (2013). Systemaic quality work in preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolinspektionen. (2011). Förskolans pedagogiska uppdrag. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrman, A., & Lindgren, A.-L. (2010). Visual documentation as a normalizing practice: A new discourse of visibility in preschool. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, H. (2003). Documentarism as politics of truth. Retrieved from http://republicart.net/disc/representations/steyerl03_en.pdf. April 24, 2012.

  • Swedish National Agency of Education. (2011). Curriculum for the preschool Lpfö 98. Revised 2010. Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • Vallberg-Roth, A. (2012). Different forms of assessment and documentation in Swedish preschools. Nordisk Barnehaveforskning, 5(23), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallberg-Roth, A.-C., & Månsson, A. (2011). Individual development plans from a critical didactic perspective: Focusing on Montessori- and Reggio Emilia-profiled preschools in Sweden. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, K., Higgins, S., Hall, E., & Woolner, P. (2013). ‘That’s not quite the way we see it’: The epistemological challenge of visual data. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the valuable comments and suggestions of the anonymous referees and of the editor Donna Berthelsen. Special thanks also to professor Eva Reimers for her comments and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarina Elfström Pettersson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council/Educational Sciences (Grant Number 729-2010-200).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elfström Pettersson, K. Sticky Dots and Lion Adventures Playing a Part in Preschool Documentation Practices. IJEC 47, 443–460 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0146-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0146-9

Keywords

Navigation