Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic Quality Work in Preschool

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the meaning that Swedish preschool teachers ascribe to systematic quality work. In Sweden, all preschools are required to work systematically with quality issues. This involves several interdependent steps that follow each other in a specific order. Although the concept of systematic quality work might be novel, the practice of following up, documenting, and evaluating preschool activities has a long tradition as means of discovering whether and in what ways preschool has contributed to children’s learning and what children have learnt by being there. The study, which was performed in Sweden, is based on interactionist perspectives and draws on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory and a critical ecology of the early childhood profession. The sample consists of 15 preschools in the country’s two major cities, Stockholm and Gothenburg, and 15 preschools from the rural area of Mälardalen in mid-Sweden. From each of the 30 preschools, one preschool group and one preschool teacher were recruited as participants. To study teacher competence, individual and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The meaning given to systematic quality work in preschool is presented under three themes: documentation and evaluation in preschool; foci of documentation and evaluation; and how, why and when to document and evaluate in preschool, and for whom. The results reveal the complexity of documenting children’s learning processes and the need for development of competence in this area.

Résumé

Le but de cette étude est d’examiner le sens que les enseignants du préscolaire suédois donnent au travail de qualité systématique. En Suède, toutes les écoles maternelles sont tenues de travailler systématiquement sur les questions de qualité. Cela implique plusieurs étapes interdépendantes qui se succèdent dans un ordre spécifique. Bien que le concept de travail de qualité systématique soit nouveau, il existe une longue tradition de pratique de suivi, d’observation et d’évaluation des activités préscolaires, utilisées comme moyen de savoir si et comment la fréquentation de l’école maternelle a contribué à l’apprentissage des enfants. L’étude, qui a été réalisée en Suède, est basée sur les perspectives interactionnistes et s’appuie sur la théorie des systèmes écologiques de Bronfenbrenner et une écologie critique de la profession de la petite enfance. L’échantillon se compose de 15 écoles maternelles des deux plus grandes villes du pays, Stockholm et Göteborg, et de 15 écoles maternelles de la région rurale de Mälardalen située dans le centre de la Suède. Une classe/groupe et un enseignant de chacune des 30 écoles maternelles ont été recrutés en tant que participants. Les compétences des enseignants ont été étudiées à partir d’entretiens individuels et semi structurés. Le sens donné au travail de qualité systématique au préscolaire est présenté sous trois thèmes: la documentation et l’évaluation au préscolaire, les points centraux de la documentation et de l’évaluation, comment, pourquoi et quand observer et évaluer à l’école maternelle, et pour qui. Les résultats mettent en lumière la complexité de l’observation des processus d’apprentissage chez les enfants et la nécessité de développer des compétences dans ce domaine.

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es investigar el significado que asignan los profesores de establecimientos preescolares suecos al trabajo sistemático de calidad. En Suecia, en todos los establecimientos preescolares se exige trabajar en forma sistemática con asuntos de calidad. Esto involucra varios pasos interdependientes que se suceden en un órden respectivo. Mientras que el concepto de trabajo sistemático de calidad puede ser considerado reciente, la práctica del seguimiento, la documentación y la evaluación de las actividades preescolares, tienen una larga tradición como forma de descubrir si, y en qué formas, el establecimiento preescolar ha contribuido al aprendizaje de los niños/as y lo que han aprendido por estar ahí. El estudio, que se realizó en Suecia, se basa en las perspectivas interaccionistas y se inspira en la teoría del sistema ecológico de Bronfenbrenner y una ecología crítica de la profesión de la infancia temprana. La muestra está conformada por 15 establecimientos preescolares en las 2 ciudades más importantes del país, Estocolmo y Gotemburgo, y por 15 establecimientos preescolares del área rural de Mälardalen, en la parte central de Suecia. De cada uno de los 30 establecimientos preescolares, se reclutó una clase/grupo y un profesor/a como participantes. Para estudiar las competencias del profesor, se realizaron entrevistas individuales y semi-estructuradas. El significado que se asigna al trabajo de calidad sistemático en el establecimiento preescolar se presenta en 3 temas: Documentación y evaluación en el establecimiento preescolar; Área de documentación y evaluación; Cómo, por qué y cuándo documentar y evaluar en el establecimiento preescolar y para quién. Los resultados ilustran la complejidad de documentar los procesos de aprendizaje de los niños y la necesidad de desarrollar competencias en esta área.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (1994). Tolkning och reflection: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and reflection—Scientific philosophy and qualitative method; in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjervås, L.L. (2011). Samtal om barn och pedagogisk dokumentation som bedömningspraktik i förskolan: en diskursanalys [Teachers view of preschool children in relation to pedagogical documentation—a discourse analysis, in Swedish]. Studies in Educational Sciences. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, P., Kainz, K., Cai, K., Tout, K., Zaslow, M., Martinez-Beck, I., Ratgeb, C. (2009). Early care and education quality and child outcomes. Research to policy brief No. 1. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration on Children and Families.

  • Burchinal, M., Vandergrift, N., Pianta, R., & Mashburn, A. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between childcare quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-Kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teacher College Record, 112(3), 579–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (1996). Förskola och skola—om två skilda traditioner och om visionen om en mötesplats [Preschool and school—two different traditions and a vision of a meeting place, in Swedish]. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.

  • Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalli, C. (2008). Pedagogy, knowledge and collaboration: towards a ground-up perspective on professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1992). Towards a sustainable society: An economic, social and environmental agenda for our children’s future. Chicago: The Noble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., & Scott, F. M. (1992). What children can tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, I., Sandberg, A., & Vuorinen, T. (2007). Practitioner-oriented research as a tool for professional development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuisma, M., & Sandberg, A. (2008). Preschool teachers’ and student preschool teachers’ thoughts about professionalism in Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(2), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1997). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview; in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Lager, K. (2009). Att organisera för kvalitet. En studie om kvalitetsarbete i kommunen och förskolan [To organize for quality. A study about quality work in municipalities and preschool; in Swedish]. Licentiatuppsats, Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.

  • Lager, K. (2010). Att organisera för kvalitet—en studie om kvalitetsarbete i kommunen och förskolan (To organize for quality—a study of quality work in municipalities and preschool). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Licentiate Dissertation.

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (1997). Varför pedagogisk documentation [Why pedagogical documenation; in Swedish]? Stockholm: HLS Förlag.

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2000). Emancipation och motstånd: dokumentation och kooperativa läroprocesser i förskolan [Emancipation and resistance: documentation and cooperative learning processes in preschool; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2006). Reconceptualizing early childhood education. In J. Einarsdottir & J. T. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education: philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 257–287). Greenwich: IAP-Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, A., & Sparrman, A. (2003). Om att bli dokumenterad. Etiska aspekter på förskolans arbete med documentation [About being documented. Ethical aspects on preschool’s work with documentation; in Swedish]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 1–2(8), 58–69.

  • Lutz, K. (2006). Konstruktionen av det avvikande förskolebarnet—En kritisk fallstudie angående utvecklingsbedömningar av yngre barn (The construction of the abnormal child—a critical case study about evaluations of younger children). Malmö: Malmö University, Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences: Licentiate Dissertation Series 2006:2.

  • Lutz, K. (2009). Kategoriseringar av barn i förskoleåldern. Styrning and administrativa processer [Categorization of preschool children. Management and administrative processes; in Swedish]. Lund: Lunds universitet.

  • Miller, L., Dalli, C., & Urban, M. (2011). Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession. In L. Miller, C. Dalli, & M. Urban (Eds.), Anthology. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD (The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development). (2005). Child care and children’s development. Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. New York: Guilford.

  • OECD. (2006). Starting strong 11: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R., & Davidsson, B. (2003). Forskningsmetodikens grunder [The base of research methodology; in Swedish]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–6). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Penn, H. (1994). Working in conflict: Developing a dynamic model of quality. In P. Moss & A. Pence (Eds.), Valuing quality in early childhood services—new approaches to defining quality (pp. 10–27). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., Barnett, W. S., Burchinal, M., & Thornburg, K. R. (2010). The effects of preschool education: What we know, how public policy is or is not aligned with the evidence base, and what we need to know. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(2), 49–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pramling, N., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2011). Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2010). Ska barns kunskaper testas eller deras kunnande utvecklas i förskolan [Are children’s knowledge to be tested or developed in preschool; in Swedish]? Nordisk barnehageforskning, 3(3), 159–167.

  • Rinaldi, C. (2006). In Dialogue with Regio Emilia. Listening, researching and learning. Routledge: London.

  • Rönnerman, K. (2011). Aktionsforskning som formativ utvärdering [Action research as formative assessment; in Swedish]. In A. Hult & A. Olofsson (Eds.), Utvärdering och bedömning i skolan. För vem och varför? s. 143–162. Stockholm: Natur and Kultur.

  • Rönnerman, K., & Solo, P. (2011). Collaborative educational action research in Nordic countries—individual and collective features. Paper presented at the NERA Congress, Jyväskylä, 10–12, March 2011.

  • Schweinhart, L., Barnes, H., & Weikart, D. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, No. 10). MI: The High/Scope Press.

  • Sheridan, S. (2001). Pedagogical quality in preschool: An issue of perspectives. Göteborg studies in Educational Sciences 160. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

  • Sheridan, S. (2011). Pedagogical quality in preschool: A commentary. In N. Pramling & I. Pramling Samuelsson (Eds.), Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics (pp. 223–242). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Johansson, E. (Eds). (2009). Barns tidiga lärande. En tvärsnittsstudie om förskolan som miljö för barns lärande. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/20404.

  • Sheridan, S., Williams, P., Sandberg, A., & Vuorinen, T. (2011). Preschool teaching in Sweden—a profession in change. Educational Research, 53(4), 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj Blatchford, I., & Woodhead, M. (Eds.). (2009). Effective early childhood programmes. Early childhood in focus (4). Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2007). Creativity, communication and collaboration: The identification of pedagogic progression in sustained shared thinking. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 2, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2006). A guide to developing the ICT curriculum for early childhood education. British Association for Early Childhood Education. London: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, D. (2005). Barndomspsykologi. Utveckling i en förändrad värld [Childhood psychology. Development in a changed world; in Swedish]. (2:a rev upplagan). Stockholm: Runa Förlag.

  • Svensk författningssamling (SFS). (2010:800). The Education Act. Stockholm: The Ministry of Education and Science in Sweden.

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2010). Early childhood matters. Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sammons, P., Melhuish, E., Elliot, K., et al. (2006). Capturing quality in early childhood through environmental rating scales. Early Child Research Quarterly, 21, 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Education and Science in Sweden. (1998). Curriculum for preschool: Lpfö 98. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Education and Science in Sweden. (2010). Curriculum for preschool Lpfö 98. Revised 2010. Stockholm: The National Agency for Education.

  • The National Agency for Education. (2004). Förskola i Brytningstid [Preschool in a time a change; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes.

  • The National Agency for Education. (2008). Tio år efter reformen [Ten years after the preschool reform; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes.

  • The National Agency for Inspection. (2011:10). Förskolans pedagogiska uppdrag [The pedagogical assignment of preschool; in Swedish]. Kvalitetsgranskning, Skolinspektionens rapport 2011:10. Diarienummer 40-2010:314, Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.

  • The Swedish National Agency for Education (2010). Facts and figures 2010. Facts and figures about pre-school activities, school-age childcare, schools and adult education in Sweden 2010. Summary of Report 349. Stockholm: Fitzes.

  • The Swedish Research Council (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Ethical research principals within Humanistic-societal research; in Swedish]. Downloaded from http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/HSFR.pdf (20110415).

  • UNESCO. (2004). Curriculum in early childhood education and care. UNESCO Policy Brief on Early Childhood, 26, UNESCO, Paris.

  • Urban, M., & Dalli, C. (2011). A profession speaking and thinking for itself. In L. Miller, C. Dalli, & M. Urban (Eds.), Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession (pp. 157–174). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2010a). Att stödja och styra barns lärande—tidig bedömning och documentation. I Perspektiv på barndom och barns lärande. En kunskapsöversikt om lärande i förskolan och grundskolans tidigare år [In Perspective on childhood and children’s learning. A review on learning in preschool and the early years in school; in Swedish] (pp. 176–234). Stockholm: Skolverket.

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2010b). Bedömning i förskolans och skolans individuella utvecklingsplaner. In: I. C. Lundahl & M. Folke-Fichtelius (Eds.), Bedömning i och av skolan. Praktik, principer, politik [Judgement in and of school. Practice, principle, politics; in Swedish] (pp. 49–67). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C., & Månsson, A. (2008a). Individuella utvecklingsplaner för yngre barn i Sverige. Ett kritiskt ämnesdidaktiskt perspektiv [Individual development plans for younger children in Sweden. A critical didactical perspective; in Swedish]. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 1(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C., & Månsson, A. (2008b). Individuella utvecklingsplaner som uttryck för reglerad barndom. Likriktning med variation [Individual development plans as an expression for regulated childhood; in Swedish]. Standardization with variation). Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 13(2), 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C., & Månsson, A. (2010). Individual development plans from a critical didactic perspective: Focusing on Montessori- and Reggio Emilia- profiled preschools in Sweden. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Sheridan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheridan, S., Williams, P. & Sandberg, A. Systematic Quality Work in Preschool. IJEC 45, 123–150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-012-0076-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-012-0076-8

Keywords

Navigation