Abstract
The Fram Strait (FS) is the primary region of sea ice export from the Arctic Ocean and thus plays an important role in regulating the amount of sea ice and fresh water entering the North Atlantic seas. A 5 a (2011–2015) sea ice thickness record retrieved from CryoSat-2 observations is used to derive a sea ice volume flux via the FS. Over this period, a mean winter accumulative volume flux (WAVF) based on sea ice drift data derived from passivemicrowave measurements, which are provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) and the Institut Francais de Recherche pour d’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), amounts to 1 029 km3 (NSIDC) and 1 463 km3 (IFREMER), respectively. For this period, a mean monthly volume flux (area flux) difference between the estimates derived from the NSIDC and IFREMER drift data is–62 km3 per month (–18×106 km2 per month). Analysis reveals that this negative bias is mainly attributable to faster IFREMER drift speeds in comparison with slower NSIDC drift data. NSIDC-based sea ice volume flux estimates are compared with the results from the University of Bremen (UB), and the two products agree relatively well with a mean monthly bias of (5.7±45.9) km3 per month for the period from January 2011 to August 2013. IFREMER-based volume flux is also in good agreement with previous results of the 1990s. Compared with P1 (1990/1991–1993/1994) and P2 (2003/2004–2007/2008), the WAVF estimates indicate a decline of more than 600 km3 in P3 (2011/2012–2014/2015). Over the three periods, the variability and the decline in the sea ice volume flux are mainly attributable to sea ice motion changes, and second to sea ice thickness changes, and the least to sea ice concentration variations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bi Haibo, Huang Haijun, Fu Min, et al. 2016a. Estimating sea-ice volume flux out of the Laptev Sea using multiple satellite observations. Polar Research, 35(1): 24875
Bi Haibo, Sun Ke, Zhou Xuan, et al. 2016b. Arctic sea ice area export through the Fram Strait estimated from satellite-based data: 1988–2012. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(7): 3144–3157
Comiso J C. 2000. Bootstrap Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS, Version 2. Boulder, Colorado USA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center
Comiso J C. 2012. Large decadal decline of the Arctic multiyear ice cover. Journal of Climate, 25(4): 1176–1193
ESA. 2013. CryoSat Product Handbook, April 2013. London, UK: ESRIN-ESA and Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London
Giles K A, Laxon S W, Ridout A L. 2008. Circumpolar thinning of Arctic sea ice following the 2007 record ice extent minimum. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(22): L22502
Girard-Ardhuin F, Ezraty R. 2012. Enhanced Arctic sea ice drift estimation merging radiometer and scatterometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(7): 2639–2648
Hansen E, Ekeberg O C, Gerland S, et al. 2014. Variability in categories of Arctic sea ice in Fram Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(10): 7175–7189
Hansen E, Gerland S, Granskog M A, et al. 2013. Thinning of Arctic sea ice observed in Fram Strait: 1990–2011. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(10): 5202–5221
Hansen E, Gerland S, Høyland K V, et al. 2015. Time variability in the annual cycle of sea ice thickness in the Transpolar Drift. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(12): 8135–8150
Hwang B. 2013. Inter-comparison of satellite sea ice motion with drifting buoy data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(24): 8741–8763
Ionita M, Scholz P, Lohmann G, et al. 2016. Linkages between atmospheric blocking, sea ice export through Fram Strait and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Scientific Reports, 6: 32881
Kimura N, Nishimura A, Tanaka Y, et al. 2013. Influence of winter sea-ice motion on summer ice cover in the Arctic. Polar Research, 32(1): 20193
Koenigk T, Mikolajewicz U, Haak H, et al. 2006. Variability of Fram Strait sea ice export: causes, impacts and feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Climate Dynamics, 26(1): 17–34
Krumpen T, Gerdes R, Haas C, et al. 2016. Recent summer sea ice thickness surveys in Fram Strait and associated ice volume fluxes. The Cryosphere, 10(2): 523–534
Krumpen T, Janout M, Hodges K I, et al. 2013. Variability and trends in Laptev Sea ice outflow between 1992–2011. The Cryosphere, 7(1): 349–363
Kurtz N T, Farrell S L, Studinger M, et al. 2013. Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data. The Cyrosphere, 7(4): 1035–1056
Kwok R. 2009. Outflow of Arctic Ocean sea ice into the Greenland and Barents Seas: 1979–2007. Journal of Climate, 22(9): 2438–2457
Kwok R, Cunningham G F. 2015. Variability of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(2045): 20140157
Kwok R, Cunningham G F, Pang S S. 2004. Fram Strait sea ice outflow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C1): C01009
Kwok R, Cunningham G F, Wensnahan M, et al. 2009. Thinning and volume loss of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover: 2003–2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 114(C7): C07005
Kwok R, Maslowski W, Laxon S W. 2005. On large outflows of Arctic sea ice into the Barents Sea. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(22): L22503
Kwok R, Rothrock D A. 1999. Variability of Fram Strait ice flux and North Atlantic oscillation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104(C3): 5177–5189
Kwok R, Rothrock D A. 2009. Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(15): L15501
Laxon S W, Giles K A, Ridout A L, et al. 2013. CryoSat A L nnual variability of sea ice thickness in the A. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(4): 732–737
Laxon S, Peacock N, Smith D. 2003. High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region. Nature, 425(6961): 947–950
Lei R B, Heil P, Wang J, et al. 2016a. Characterization of sea-ice kinematic in the Arctic outflow region using buoy data. Polar Research, 35(1): 22658
Lei R B, TianR58.sear, Leppäranta M, et al. 2016b. Changes in summer sea ice, albedo, and portioning of surface solar radiation in the Pacific sector of Arctic Ocean during 1982–2009. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121(8): 5470–5486
Meier W N. 2005. Comparison of passive microwave ice concentration algorithm retrievals with AVHRR imagery in arctic peripheral seas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 43(6): 1324–1337
Peterson B J, McClelland J, Curry R, et al. 2006. Trajectory shifts in the Arctic and subarctic freshwater cycle. Science, 313(5790): 1061–1066
Serreze M C, Holland M M, Stroeve J. 2007. Perspectives on the Arctic’s shrinking sea-ice cover. Science, 315(5818): 1533–1536
Smedsrud L H, Halvorsen M H, Stroeve J C, et al. 2017. Fram Strait sea ice export variability and September Arctic sea ice extent over the last 80 years. The Cryosphere, 11(1): 65–79
Spreen G, Kern S, Stammer D, et al. 2006. Satellite-based estimates of sea-ice volume flux through Fram Strait. Annals of Glaciology, 44(1): 321–328
Spreen G, Kern S, Stammer D, et al. 2009. Fram Strait sea ice volume export estimated between 2003 and 2008 from satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(19): L19502
Spreen G, Kwok R, Hansen E, et al. 2016. Arctic sea ice volume export through Fram Strait from combined satellite and upward looking sonar (ULS). In: ESA Living Planet Symposium 2016. Prague, Czech Republic
Steele M, Ermold W. 2015. Loitering of the retreating sea ice edge in the Arctic Seas. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(12): 7699–7721
Stroeve J, Notz D. 2015. Insights on past and future sea-ice evolution from combining observations and models. Global and Planetary Change, 135: 119–132
Sumata H, Gerdes R, Kauker F, et al. 2015. Empirical error functions for monthly mean Arctic sea-ice drift. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(11): 7450–7475
Sumata H, Lavergne T, Girard‐Ardhuin F, et al. 2014. An intercomparison of Arctic ice drift products to deduce uncertainty estimates. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(8): 4887–4921
Szanyi S, Lukovich J V, Barber D G, et al. 2016. Persistent artifacts in the NSIDC ice motion data set and their implications for analysis. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20): 10800–10807
Vinje T. 2001. Fram Strait ice fluxes and atmospheric circulation: 1950–2000. Journal of Climate, 14(16): 3508–3517
Vinje T, Nordlund N, Kvambekk Å. 1998. Monitoring ice thickness in Fram Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 103(C5): 10437–10449
Wingham D J, Francis C R, Baker S, et al. 2006. CryoSat: a mission to determine the fluctuations in earth’s land and marine ice fields. Advances in Space Research, 37(4): 841–871
Zhang J L, Rothrock D, Steele M. 2000. Recent changes in Arctic sea ice: the interplay between ice dynamics and thermodynamics. Journal of Climate, 13(17): 3099–3114
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the following organizations for providing the data used in this study: the NSIDC (ice concentration, motion), the IFREMER (sea ice drift), and the JPL (Cryosat-2 thickness).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41406215; the Foundation of Laboratory for Marine Geology, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; the Foundation of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology; the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China under contract No. 2014M561971; the Open Fund for the Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences under contract No. MGE2013KG07; the NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers under contract No. U1606401.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bi, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Recent satellite-derived sea ice volume flux through the Fram Strait: 2011–2015. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 37, 107–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1270-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1270-9