Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Random-parameters analysis of energy consumption and economic output on carbon dioxide emissions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper takes a renewed look at the impacts of energy consumption (fossil fuels and renewable) and economic output on carbon dioxide emissions. Using country-level data from 103 countries from 1990 to 2011, a random-parameters model was developed, to account for unobserved heterogeneity across countries, and create potential strategies for reducing carbon dioxide emissions across countries. In order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, two broad strategies were found to be feasible in this paper: systematic reduction in fossil fuels use through energy conservation and an expansion in the consumption of renewable energy sources that are free from CO\(_{2}\) emissions. On average, a 1 % decrease in fossil fuels consumption would decrease carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 1.46 %, varying from 0.17 to 2.44 % across countries. While a 1 % increase in renewable energy consumption would decrease CO\(_{2}\) emissions by 0.01 to 0.68 %, with an average of 0.18 %. Newly industrialized countries can significantly improve economic output by creating opportunities for industries to invest in green energy, which will significantly boost economic growth. The strategy of conserving fossil fuels through increasing efficiencies in vehicle fuels, power plants, buildings, and travel demand management are feasible to ensure sustainable reductions in global carbon dioxide emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman, F., Biewald, B., White, D., Woolf, T., Moomaw, W.: Grandfathering and coal plant emissions: the cost of cleaning up the Clean Air Act. Energy Policy 27(15), 929–940 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andres, R.J., Fielding, D.J., Marland, G., Boden, T.A., Kumar, N., Kearney, A.T.: Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel use, 1751–1950. Tellus B 51(4), 759–765 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ang, J.B.: CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772–4778 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Apergis, N., Payne, J.E.: CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37(8), 3282–3286 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Apergis, N., Payne, J.E.: On the causal dynamics between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Energy Syst. 2(3–4), 299–312 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Auffhammer, M., Steinhauser, R.: Forecasting the path of US CO\(_{2}\) emissions using state-level information. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94(1), 172–185 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Van Nguyen, P.: Economic development and CO\(_{2}\) emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J. Publ. Econs. 90(6), 1347–1363 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belloumi, M.: Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy 37(7), 2745–2753 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhat, C.R.: Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transp. Res. Part. B Methodol. 37(9), 837–855 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blasing, T.J., Broniak, C.T., Marland, G.: Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohan, D.S., Douglass, C.: Potential emissions reductions from grandfathered coal power plants in the United States. Energy Policy 39(9), 4816–4822 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ezcurra, R.: Is there cross-country convergence in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy 35(2), 1363–1372 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman, Gene M., Krueger, A.B.: Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber, P.M. (ed.) The Mexico-US Free Trade Agreement, pp. 13–57. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

  15. Halicioglu, F.: An econometric study of CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3), 1156–1164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halkos, G., Tzeremes, N.: Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20. Energy Econ. 40(11), 110–118 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halton, J.H.: On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer. Math. 2(1), 84–90 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., Wilson, D.M.: Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev. Econ. Stat. 84, 541–551 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heil, M.T., Selden, T.M.: Carbon emissions and economic development: future trajectories based on historical experience. Environ. Dev. Econ. 6(01), 63–83 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T.M.: Stoking the fires? CO\(_{2}\) emissions and economic growth. J. Publ. Econ. 57(1), 85–101 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, Y., Rebennack, S., Zheng, Q.P.: Techno-economic analysis and optimization models for carbon capture and storage: a survey. Energy Syst. 4(4), 315–353 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  23. Kraft, J., Kraft, A.: Relationship between energy and GNP. J. Energy Dev. 3(2), 401–403 (1978)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuznets, S.: Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45(1), 1–28 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, C.C., Lee, J.D.: Income and CO\(_{2}\) emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 37(2), 413–423 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mannering, F.L., Bhat, C.R.: Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions. Anal Method Accid. Res. 1, 1–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marland, G., Boden, T.A., Andres, R.J., Brenkert, A.L., Johnston, C.A.: Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change pp. 34–43 (2003)

  28. Mehrara, M.: Energy consumption and economic growth: the case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy 35(5), 2939–2945 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Bosch, P., Dave, R., Meyer, L., 2007. Climate change 2007-mitigation of climate change: Working Group III contribution to the fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press, NY

  30. Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., Prasad, A.: A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: Evidence from the G7 countries. Energy Policy 36(7), 2765–2769 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neumayer, E.: National carbon dioxide emissions: geography matters. Area 36, 33–40 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Neumayer, E.: Can natural factors explain any cross-country differences in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy 30(1), 7–12 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. NOAA. Carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory reaches new milestone: tops 400 ppm. https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/7992. Accessed 28 July 2013 (2013)

  34. NRC: Advancing the science of climate change. Link to EPA’s External National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2010)

  35. Pao, H.T., Tsai, C.M.: Modeling and forecasting the CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy 36(5), 2450–2458 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patiño-Echeverri, D., Morel, B., Apt, J., Chen, C.: Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted? Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(23), 7980–7986 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schelling, T.C.: Some economics of global warming. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(1), 1–14 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmalensee, R., Stoker, T.M., Judson, R.A.: World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80(1), 15–27 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaffer, G., Olsen, S.M., Pedersen, J.O.P.: Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels. Nat. Geosci. 2(2), 105–109 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shafik, N.: Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46, 757–773 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, B.T.: Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62(3), 482–489 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stern, D.I.: The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32(8), 1419–1439 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stern, D.I., Common, M.S.: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41, 162–178 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Train, K.,1999. Halton sequences for mixed logit. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkley

  45. UN (United Nations). Carbon dioxide emissions. Accessed 15 May 2013 (2012)

  46. USEIA (United States Energy Information Administration). Monthly Energy Review, May 2013. Accessed 19 June 2013 (2013)

  47. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2013. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2011. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, EPA 430-R-13-001

  48. Washington, S.P., Karlaftis, M.G., Mannering, F.L.: Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. World Bank, 2015. Data catalog. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 15 October 2015

  50. Zheng, Q.P., Rebennack, S., Pardalos, P., Pereira, M.V.F., Iliadis, N.A.: Handbook of CO\(_{2}\) in power systems. Springer, New York (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Bismark R. D. K. Agbelie

Authors
  1. Bismark R. D. K. Agbelie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bismark R. D. K. Agbelie.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7.

Table 7 Clustering of countries by 2011 GDP values
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agbelie, B.R.D.K. Random-parameters analysis of energy consumption and economic output on carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Syst 7, 549–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0181-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0181-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation