Abstract
Analysis of engineering failures is a complex process. It is a task that requires information from personnel having expertise in many areas. From the information gathered, a failure analyst needs to discover what was fundamentally responsible for the failure, termed as “root cause”, and to determine the sequence of events that led to the final failure. Root cause analysis not only helps in finding solutions to the immediate problem, but also provides valuable guidelines as to what needs to be done to prevent recurrence of similar failures in future. However, experience suggests that most failure analyses fall short of this goal. Also, it is seen that a significant number of failure analysts incorrectly use the term “root cause“ when what they really establish is the primary cause of failure or simple physical cause. Is this because the definition of “root cause“ not understood adequately? The author examines this aspect through a few service failure cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daniel P. Dennies, How to Organize and Run a Failure Investigation, ASM International, American Society for Metals, Metals park, Ohio, (2005).
Zamanzadeh M, Larkin E and Gobbin D, A Re-examination of Failure Analysis and Root Cause Determination, www.matcoinc.com (Web site accessed in June 2008)
Ramachandran V, Raghuram A C, Krishnan R V and Bhaumik S K, Failure Analysis of Engineering Structures: Methodology and Case Histories, ASM International, American Society for Metals, Metals park, Ohio, (2005).
Office of Safety & Mission Assurance, Chief Engineers Office, Root Cause Analysis: Overview, www.hq.nasa.gov (Web site accessed in June 2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhaumik, S.K. Root cause analysis in engineering failures. Trans Indian Inst Met 63, 297–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0040-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0040-y