Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous visualization of surface and flow field for a projectile

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports establishment of the simultaneous measurement of the flight attitude and flow field visualization for the near-field pressure measurement experiments in a ballistic range. To measure the flight attitude and flow field visualization for a spherical projectile, the simultaneous visualization method, which is combination of the shadowgraph method and the direct photography, was utilized. It is possible to visualize both the flow field around the projectile and the projectile surface. The angles of pitch, roll and yaw can be calculated from the displacement of line markings on the projectile surface. The image of the projectile by the direct photography is distorted because of the aberration of the optical arrangement, the camera lens and the non-uniform thickness of acrylic windows. Image distortion was calibrated by taking images on actual set-up, so that the accuracy of the angles was improved. In addition, the diffuse reflection light from the projectile surface was confirmed not to influence the flow field visualization. This method is useful for the near-field pressure measurement experiments in a ballistic range. The flight attitude affects the near-field pressure value strongly. Since the near-field pressure with a detailed flight attitude is obtained, its influences can be evaluated using the method which has ability of the flight attitude measurement. In addition, a shock interaction around a projectile can be captured.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock OH (1974) Focused shadowgraph visualization of boundary-layer transition in aeroballistic range studies. Opt Eng 13(2):143–146. doi:10.1117/12.7971688

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain AG, Interieri PF (1961) Determination of stability derivatives from ballistic range test of rolling aircraft models. NASA technical memorandum X-399

  • Brown JD et al (2006) Complex-trajectory aerodynamics data for code validation from a new free-flight facility. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA, p 4650

  • Callagban JG (1966) A feasibility investigation concerning the simulation of sonic boom by ballistic models. NASA contractor report, NASA CR-603

  • Canning TN et al (1970) Ballistic-range technology, AGARDograph No. 138, pp 197–266

  • Carlson HW (1961) An investigation of the influence of lift on sonic-boom intensity by means of wind-tunnel measurements of the pressure fields of several wing-body combinations at a Mach number of 2.01. NASA TN D-881

  • Kawazoe H, Arima K (2001) Analysis of aerodynamic force and moments by a single video camera and its application to falling motion of bowl-shaped body. In: Proceedings of the 31st AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA, p 2986

  • Liepmann HW, Roshko A (1957) Element of gasdynamics. Wiley, New York, pp 103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda A et al (2011) Combined experimental and numerical diagnostics for near-field flow around a supersonic flight model. Trans JSASS Aerosp Tech Jpn 9:37–44. doi:10.2322/tastj.9.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numata D et al (2008) Experimental study of hypervelocity impacts at low temperatures. Shock Waves 18:169–183. doi:10.1007/s00193-008-0156-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nysmith CR, Summers JL (1962) An experimental investigation of the impact resistance of doublesheet structures at velocities to 24,000 feet per second. NASA technical note D-1431

  • Saito T et al (2011) Shock stand-off distance of a solid sphere decelerating in transonic velocity range. Shock Waves 21:483–489. doi:10.1007/s00193-011-0323-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasoh A, Oshiba S (2006) Impactless, in-tube sabot separation technique useful for modest-sized supersonic ballistic ranges. Rev Sci Instrum 77:105106. doi:10.1063/1.2360766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada H et al (1991) The 10 cm × 10 cm magnetic suspension and balance system at the national aerospace laboratory. In: Proceedings of the 29th aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA, p 397

  • Tam T et al (2000) Sonic boom testing of artificially blunted leading edge (ABLE) concepts in the NASA Ames aeroballistic range. In: Proceedings of the 38th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA, p 1011

  • Toyoda A et al (2010) Low boom characteristic of supersonic biplane with Sears–Haack fuselage. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on advanced flow information and transdisciplinary fluid integration, pp 48–49

  • Ukai T et al (2012) Effect of shock wave reflection and diffraction for near-field pressure measurement of supersonic projectile using ballistic range. In: Proceedings of the 20th international shock interaction symposium, pp 203–206

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Ukai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ukai, T., Kikuchi, T., Ohtani, K. et al. Simultaneous visualization of surface and flow field for a projectile. J Vis 16, 331–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-013-0174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-013-0174-1

Keywords

Navigation