Skip to main content
Log in

High-accuracy 3-D deformation measurement method with an improved structured-light principle

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a high-accuracy 3-D deformation measurement (HADM) method with structured light is proposed and applied to wing deformation measurement in wind tunnel experiments. The present method employs an arbitrarily arranged fringe projector and a perpendicularly placed camera. The exact phase-height mapping using the phase differences of the projected sinusoidal fringe patterns, as well as the spatial distribution of the fringe, is accurately derived. It not only presents high feasibility but also reduces systemic uncertainties arising from deviations between the ideal model and the real-world conditions. Meanwhile, a dynamic boundary process algorithm is proposed to reduce the measurement uncertainty caused by fringe fracture near the object boundary. It is calibrated that a high accuracy with the average measurement uncertainty of 0.0237 mm is achieved, which is less than 0.01% of the side length of 25 cm of the field of view. In the wind tunnel experiments, the 3-D deformations of the elastic wing, particularly the key geometric parameters such as wing tip position, angle of attack, and dihedral angle, are well reconstructed to provide an in-depth explanation for the aerodynamic characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee J J, Shinozuka M. Real-time displacement measurement of a flexible bridge using digital image processing techniques. Exp Mech, 2006, 46: 105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, et al. Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: A review. Meas Sci Technol, 2009, 20: 062001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goyal D, Pabla B S. The vibration monitoring methods and signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review. Arch Computat Methods Eng, 2016, 23: 585–594

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Noll T E, Brown J M, Perez-Davis M E, et al. Investigation of the Helios prototype aircraft mishap volume I Mishap Report. NASA Report, 2004

  5. Xiang J, Yan Y, Li D. Recent advance in nonlinear aeroelastic analysis and control of the aircraft. Chin J Aeronaut, 2014, 27: 12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiomkin S, Raveh D E. A review of membrane-wing aeroelasticity. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2021, 126: 100738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J J, Wu K. Experimental investigations of the effect of wing elastic deformations on aerodynamics. Acta Aerodyn Sin, 2007, 25: 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor G, Kroker A, Gursul I. Passive flow control over flexible nonslender delta wings. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, 2005

  9. Feng S Y, Guo Q F, Wang J J, et al. Influence of membrane wing active deformation on the aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 2474–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He X, Guo Q F, Wang J J. Extended flexible trailing-edge on the flow structures of an airfoil at high angle of attack. Exp Fluids, 2019, 60: 122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Y W, Wang J S, Wang J J, et al. Flow-structure interaction of an inverted flag in a water tunnel. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2019, 62: 124711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arbós-Torrent S, Ganapathisubramani B, Palacios R. Leading- and trailing-edge effects on the aeromechanics of membrane aerofoils. J Fluids Struct, 2013, 38: 107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo Q F, He X, Wang Z, et al. Effects of wing flexibility on aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model. Chin J Aeronaut, 2021, 34: 133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo Q F, Feng S Y, Wang J J. Effects of 3-D deformation of elastic wings on aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2023, 66: 1365–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu T C, Ranson W F, Sutton M A. Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech, 1985, 25: 232–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruck H A, McNeill S R, Sutton M A, et al. Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech, 1989, 29: 261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peters W H, Ranson W F. Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress analysis. Opt Eng, 1982, 21: 427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bleischwitz R, de Kat R, Ganapathisubramani B. Aeromechanics of membrane and rigid wings in and out of ground-effect at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Fluids Struct, 2016, 62: 318–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bleischwitz R, de Kat R, Ganapathisubramani B. Near-wake characteristics of rigid and membrane wings in ground effect. J Fluids Struct, 2018, 80: 199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Açıkel H H, Genç M S. Control of laminar separation bubble over wind turbine airfoil using partial flexibility on suction surface. Energy, 2018, 165: 176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mertens C, de Rojas Cordero T, Sodja J, et al. Aeroelastic characterization of a flexible wing using particle tracking velocimetry measurements. AIAA J, 2021, 8: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. He X, Guo Q F, Xu Y, et al. Aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction of an airfoil with actively controlled flexible leeward surface. J Fluid Mech, 2023, 954: A34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. He X, Wang J J. Fluid-structure interaction of a flexible membrane wing at a fixed angle of attack. Phys Fluids, 2020, 32: 127102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeda M, Mutoh K. Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-D object shapes. Appl Opt, 1983, 22: 3977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fu J, Liu X, Shyy W, et al. Effects of flexibility and aspect ratio on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Bioinspir Biomim, 2018, 13: 036001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu Y, Liu X, Shyy W, et al. Flow over the tip region of a flexible cantilever wing with the effect of angle of attack. J Fluids Eng, 2019, 141: 094501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoerner S, Bonamy C. Structured-light-based surface measuring for application in fluid-structure interaction. Exp Fluids, 2019, 60: 168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Spagnolo G S, Guattari G, Sapia C, et al. Contouring of artwork surface by fringe projection and FFT analysis. Optics Lasers Eng, 2000, 33: 141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maurel A, Cobelli P, Pagneux V, et al. Experimental and theoretical inspection of the phase-to-height relation in Fourier transform profilometry. Appl Opt, 2009, 48: 380–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mao X, Chen W, Su X, et al. Fourier transform profilometry based on a projecting-imaging model. J Opt Soc Am A, 2007, 24: 3735–3740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Z, Du H, Bi H. Out-of-plane shape determination in generalized fringe projection profilometry. Opt Express, 2007, 14: 12122–12133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao Y, Cao Y, Wu Y. Improved algorithm for phase-to-height mapping in phase measuring profilometry. Appl Opt, 2012, 51: 1149–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feng S, Zuo C, Zhang L, et al. Calibration of fringe projection profilometry: A comparative review. Optics Lasers Eng, 2021, 143: 106622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen Y, Li S, Cheng H, et al. Universal calculation formula and calibration method in Fourier transform profilometry. Appl Opt, 2010, 49: 6563–6569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Du H, Wang Z. Three-dimensional shape measurement with an arbitrarily arranged fringe projection profilometry system. Opt Lett, 2007, 32: 2438–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang L, Chua P S K, Asundi A. Least-squares calibration method for fringe projection profilometry considering camera lens distortion. Appl Opt, 2010, 49: 1539–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang Z, Xi J, Yu Y, et al. Accurate projector calibration based on a new point-to-point mapping relationship between the camera and projector images. Appl Opt, 2015, 54: 347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen R, Xu J, Chen H, et al. Accurate calibration method for camera and projector in fringe patterns measurement system. Appl Opt, 2016, 55: 4293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xing S, Guo H. Iterative calibration method for measurement system having lens distortions in fringe projection profilometry. Opt Express, 2020, 28: 1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mao X, Chen W, Su X. Improved Fourier-transform profilometry. Appl Opt, 2007, 46: 664–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bohnker J R, Breuer K S. Control of separated flow using actuated compliant membrane wings. AIAA J, 2017, 57: 3801–3811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gonzalez R C, Woods R E. Digital Image Processing. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JinJun Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12127802 and 11721202).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Q., Wang, J. High-accuracy 3-D deformation measurement method with an improved structured-light principle. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 3450–3461 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2516-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2516-3

Navigation