Skip to main content
Log in

National road fatality maxima: why the 1972 cluster?

Los máximos del número de fallecidos en carretera a nivel nacional. ¿Por qué aparece el grupo de 1972?

  • Published:
Securitas Vialis

Abstract

We emphasize our ignorance of the reasons for the simultaneous turnaround in 1972 of the number of yearly road fatalities in ten OECD countries (and in four others, just before or after) and summarize some of the foundations of this ignorance. This failure to make scientific sense of the evolution and timing of the key road safety indicator in so many OECD countries implies that we also fail to understand why other countries actually had their own global maximum in years other than 1971–1973. By implication, questions then asked about upward or downward trending road fatality forecasts cannot be adequately answered. Making sense of the joint occurrence of national maxima, very much Meadow-shaped in many of these 14 countries and in others, is a missing pre-requisite.

Resumen

Destacamos la ignorancia sobre las razones en el cambio de tendencia simultánea en 1972 del número de fallecidos en accidentes de tráfico anualmente en los 10 países de la OCDE (y en otros 4, justo antes o después) y resumimos algunos de los fundamentos sobre esta ignorancia. Esta falta de sentido de la evolución científica y el indicador clave de seguridad vial en muchos países de la OCDE implica que también somos capaces de entender por qué otros países tenían en realidad su propio máximo global en años distintos de 1971 a 1973. Por ende, cuestiones entonces planteadas sobre la tendencia a la alta o a la baja de las previsiones de mortalidad en carretera no pueden ser respondidas adecuadamente. Encontrarle un sentido a la ocurrencia simultánea de los valores máximos en muchos de estos 14 países es un punto de partida.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figura 1
Figura 2
Figura 3
Figura 4
Figura 5
Figura 6
Figura 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This estimate is derived from the Sidi Bel Abbes registry established by Professor Suleiman.

  2. Certain Canadian provinces had their maximum in 1972 and others in 1973.

  3. We do not have at hand the series for Israël where the maximum is also in 1972.

  4. There exist thousands of studies of road safety interventions, but we could not find a single empirical demonstration of a turning point caused by them, because they typically produce shifts, or « jumps » in the trend, as in the real example of maximum highway speed modifications illustrated in Figura 5.

  5. The maximum for New Zealand is also in 1972 but the liberalization of trucking, freed from its 50-mile range limit in the middle of the 1980’s, makes the graph, available in Gaudry and Gelgoot [11], less interesting.

  6. It is posible to define non constant dummy variables incorporating hypotheses about the distribution of effects over time.

  7. On December 3, 1973, speed was limited to 120 km/h. It was raised to 140 km/h on March 13, 1974, and lowered to 130 km/h on November 6 of the same year.

  8. Men and women who obtain new driving permits do so with distinct seasonal patterns.

  9. In all of these countries, the trend has continued to be downwards since 1999. The peaks showed are therefore global maxima.

  10. Where the number of road fatalities was until very recently a military secret.

  11. Immediate loss of driving permit for many offenses; and fines multiplied by 10 and often by 20.

References

  1. Bouthoul, G. (1970). L’Infanticide Différé. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, S., Duval, H., Lassarre, S., & Orfeuil, J.-P. (1998). Limitations de vitesse, les décisions publiques et leurs effets. Paris: Editions Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Commission Européenne. (2010). Vers un espace européen de la sécurité routière: orientations politiques pour la sécurité routière de 2011 à 2020. Communication de la Commission au Parlement Européen, au Conseil, au Comité Économique et Social Européen et au Comité des Régions. COM(2010) 389, Bruxelles, le 20.7.2010.

  4. Gaudry, M. (2007). The international mystery of peaking yearly road fatalities in 1972–1973. Outstanding presentation made at the 1st FERSI Scientific Road Safety Research-Conference in Bergisch Gladbach, September 2005. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen Mensch und Sicherheit, Heft M 185, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaudry, M. (2013). Insécurité routière: le mystère du Cervin 1972. Transports 479. 17–23, Paris, mai-juin 2013.

  6. Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2010). Un état de l’art de la modélisation structurelle des bilans nationaux de l’insécurité routière. Synthèses S62. 144 p., INRETS, Paris, décembre. ISBN: 978-2-85782-687-5.

  7. Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Some hard questions for road safety experts. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). National road safety performance: data, the emergence of two single-outcome modelling streams and public health. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Beyond single-outcome models: aggregate and disaggregate decompositions of road safety risk. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Multivariate road safety models: future research orientations and current use to forecast performance. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaudry, M., & Gelgoot, S. (2002). The international mystery of peaking yearly road fatalities in 1972–1973: from smeed to DRAG-type multinational and multiprovincial models MNP-1 and MPM-1. Publication AJD-8 (Manuscript Version 2), Agora Jules Dupuit, Université de Montréal, 52 pages. www.e-ajd.net.

  12. Gaudry, M., & Himouri, S. (2013). DRAG-ALZ-1, a first model of monthly total road demand, accident frequency, severity and victims by category, and of mean speed on highways, Algeria 1970–2007. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Got, C., Delhomme, P., & Lassarre, S. (2007). Éditorial : La mortalité routière en France peut encore reculer. Population et Sociétés, 434, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heinsohn, G. (2003). Söhne und Weltmacht: Terror im Aufstieg und Fall der Nationen (Sons and Imperial Power: Terror and the Rise and Fall of Nations), Zurich. http://opac.suub.uni-bremen.de/.

  15. Heinsohn, G. (2008). Exploding population, International Herald Tribune, Saturday, January 19. http://www.iht.com/.

  16. Hoyau, P.-A. (2004). Les tués de la route, Récits INRETS.

  17. Nilsson, G. (2000). Hastighetsförändringar och trafiksäkerhetseffekter - Potensmodellen. VTI notat 76-2000. Linköping: Väg- och Transportforskningsinstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsson, G. (2004). Traffic safety dimension and the power model to describe the effect of speed on safety. Sweden: Lund Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson, G. (2004, 2005 in English). Traffic safety measures and observance: Compliance with speed limits, seatbelt use and driver sobriety. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTI report 951A, Linköping, Sweden.

  20. Smeed, R. J. (1949). Some statistical aspects of road safety research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Part I, 1–34. Royal Statistical Society, London.

  21. Smeed, R. J. (1968). Variations in the pattern of accident rates in various countries and their causes. Traffic Engineering & Control, 10(7), 364–371.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stipdonk, H. (2013). Road safety in bits and pieces: For a better understanding of the development of the number of road fatalities. Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University, 219 p. June 21. SWOV-Dissertatiereeks, Leidschendam. ISBN: 978-90-73946-11-8.

  23. Tolón-Becerra1, A., & Lastra-Bravo, X. (2011). Dynamic national targets for EU road safety policy in the period 2011–2020. University of Almeria.

  24. Weber, D. C. (1970). A stochastic model for automobile accident experience. Mimeograph Series No. 651, Institute of Statistics, North Carolina State University at Raleigh.

  25. Weber, D. C. (1971). Accident rate potential: an application of multiple regression analysis of a poisson process. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(334), 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. WHO [World Health Organization]. (1999). The World Health report 1999: Making a difference. Geneva.

  27. WHO [World Health Organization]. (2004). The world report on road traffic injury prevention.

  28. WHO [World Health Organization]. (2009). Global status report on road safety. Geneva, 301 pages.

  29. WHO [World Health Organization], World Bank and Harvard University. (1996). Global burden of disease.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Éditions EMH for the permission to translate and enrich the original French version of this paper by the same author [5]. We draw very heavily from a French study [6] financed by the PREDIT program of the Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de l’Aménagement du Territoire and updated recently [710]. Information on Algeria was gracefully supplied by Slimane Himouri, Director of the LCTPE (Laboratoire Construction, Transport et Protection de l’Environnement), Université Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Mostaganem, Algeria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Gaudry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaudry, M. National road fatality maxima: why the 1972 cluster?. Securitas Vialis 6, 47–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12615-014-9074-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12615-014-9074-y

Keywords

Palabras clave

Navigation