Abstract
We emphasize our ignorance of the reasons for the simultaneous turnaround in 1972 of the number of yearly road fatalities in ten OECD countries (and in four others, just before or after) and summarize some of the foundations of this ignorance. This failure to make scientific sense of the evolution and timing of the key road safety indicator in so many OECD countries implies that we also fail to understand why other countries actually had their own global maximum in years other than 1971–1973. By implication, questions then asked about upward or downward trending road fatality forecasts cannot be adequately answered. Making sense of the joint occurrence of national maxima, very much Meadow-shaped in many of these 14 countries and in others, is a missing pre-requisite.
Resumen
Destacamos la ignorancia sobre las razones en el cambio de tendencia simultánea en 1972 del número de fallecidos en accidentes de tráfico anualmente en los 10 países de la OCDE (y en otros 4, justo antes o después) y resumimos algunos de los fundamentos sobre esta ignorancia. Esta falta de sentido de la evolución científica y el indicador clave de seguridad vial en muchos países de la OCDE implica que también somos capaces de entender por qué otros países tenían en realidad su propio máximo global en años distintos de 1971 a 1973. Por ende, cuestiones entonces planteadas sobre la tendencia a la alta o a la baja de las previsiones de mortalidad en carretera no pueden ser respondidas adecuadamente. Encontrarle un sentido a la ocurrencia simultánea de los valores máximos en muchos de estos 14 países es un punto de partida.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This estimate is derived from the Sidi Bel Abbes registry established by Professor Suleiman.
Certain Canadian provinces had their maximum in 1972 and others in 1973.
We do not have at hand the series for Israël where the maximum is also in 1972.
There exist thousands of studies of road safety interventions, but we could not find a single empirical demonstration of a turning point caused by them, because they typically produce shifts, or « jumps » in the trend, as in the real example of maximum highway speed modifications illustrated in Figura 5.
The maximum for New Zealand is also in 1972 but the liberalization of trucking, freed from its 50-mile range limit in the middle of the 1980’s, makes the graph, available in Gaudry and Gelgoot [11], less interesting.
It is posible to define non constant dummy variables incorporating hypotheses about the distribution of effects over time.
On December 3, 1973, speed was limited to 120 km/h. It was raised to 140 km/h on March 13, 1974, and lowered to 130 km/h on November 6 of the same year.
Men and women who obtain new driving permits do so with distinct seasonal patterns.
In all of these countries, the trend has continued to be downwards since 1999. The peaks showed are therefore global maxima.
Where the number of road fatalities was until very recently a military secret.
Immediate loss of driving permit for many offenses; and fines multiplied by 10 and often by 20.
References
Bouthoul, G. (1970). L’Infanticide Différé. Paris: Hachette.
Cohen, S., Duval, H., Lassarre, S., & Orfeuil, J.-P. (1998). Limitations de vitesse, les décisions publiques et leurs effets. Paris: Editions Hermès.
Commission Européenne. (2010). Vers un espace européen de la sécurité routière: orientations politiques pour la sécurité routière de 2011 à 2020. Communication de la Commission au Parlement Européen, au Conseil, au Comité Économique et Social Européen et au Comité des Régions. COM(2010) 389, Bruxelles, le 20.7.2010.
Gaudry, M. (2007). The international mystery of peaking yearly road fatalities in 1972–1973. Outstanding presentation made at the 1st FERSI Scientific Road Safety Research-Conference in Bergisch Gladbach, September 2005. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen Mensch und Sicherheit, Heft M 185, 18–19.
Gaudry, M. (2013). Insécurité routière: le mystère du Cervin 1972. Transports 479. 17–23, Paris, mai-juin 2013.
Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2010). Un état de l’art de la modélisation structurelle des bilans nationaux de l’insécurité routière. Synthèses S62. 144 p., INRETS, Paris, décembre. ISBN: 978-2-85782-687-5.
Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Some hard questions for road safety experts. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 1–5.
Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). National road safety performance: data, the emergence of two single-outcome modelling streams and public health. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 6–19.
Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Beyond single-outcome models: aggregate and disaggregate decompositions of road safety risk. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 20–37.
Gaudry, M., & de Lapparent, M. (2013). Multivariate road safety models: future research orientations and current use to forecast performance. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 38–56.
Gaudry, M., & Gelgoot, S. (2002). The international mystery of peaking yearly road fatalities in 1972–1973: from smeed to DRAG-type multinational and multiprovincial models MNP-1 and MPM-1. Publication AJD-8 (Manuscript Version 2), Agora Jules Dupuit, Université de Montréal, 52 pages. www.e-ajd.net.
Gaudry, M., & Himouri, S. (2013). DRAG-ALZ-1, a first model of monthly total road demand, accident frequency, severity and victims by category, and of mean speed on highways, Algeria 1970–2007. Research in Transportation Economics, 37(1), 66–78.
Got, C., Delhomme, P., & Lassarre, S. (2007). Éditorial : La mortalité routière en France peut encore reculer. Population et Sociétés, 434, 1–4.
Heinsohn, G. (2003). Söhne und Weltmacht: Terror im Aufstieg und Fall der Nationen (Sons and Imperial Power: Terror and the Rise and Fall of Nations), Zurich. http://opac.suub.uni-bremen.de/.
Heinsohn, G. (2008). Exploding population, International Herald Tribune, Saturday, January 19. http://www.iht.com/.
Hoyau, P.-A. (2004). Les tués de la route, Récits INRETS.
Nilsson, G. (2000). Hastighetsförändringar och trafiksäkerhetseffekter - Potensmodellen. VTI notat 76-2000. Linköping: Väg- och Transportforskningsinstitutet.
Nilsson, G. (2004). Traffic safety dimension and the power model to describe the effect of speed on safety. Sweden: Lund Institute of Technology.
Nilsson, G. (2004, 2005 in English). Traffic safety measures and observance: Compliance with speed limits, seatbelt use and driver sobriety. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTI report 951A, Linköping, Sweden.
Smeed, R. J. (1949). Some statistical aspects of road safety research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Part I, 1–34. Royal Statistical Society, London.
Smeed, R. J. (1968). Variations in the pattern of accident rates in various countries and their causes. Traffic Engineering & Control, 10(7), 364–371.
Stipdonk, H. (2013). Road safety in bits and pieces: For a better understanding of the development of the number of road fatalities. Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University, 219 p. June 21. SWOV-Dissertatiereeks, Leidschendam. ISBN: 978-90-73946-11-8.
Tolón-Becerra1, A., & Lastra-Bravo, X. (2011). Dynamic national targets for EU road safety policy in the period 2011–2020. University of Almeria.
Weber, D. C. (1970). A stochastic model for automobile accident experience. Mimeograph Series No. 651, Institute of Statistics, North Carolina State University at Raleigh.
Weber, D. C. (1971). Accident rate potential: an application of multiple regression analysis of a poisson process. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(334), 285–288.
WHO [World Health Organization]. (1999). The World Health report 1999: Making a difference. Geneva.
WHO [World Health Organization]. (2004). The world report on road traffic injury prevention.
WHO [World Health Organization]. (2009). Global status report on road safety. Geneva, 301 pages.
WHO [World Health Organization], World Bank and Harvard University. (1996). Global burden of disease.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Éditions EMH for the permission to translate and enrich the original French version of this paper by the same author [5]. We draw very heavily from a French study [6] financed by the PREDIT program of the Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de l’Aménagement du Territoire and updated recently [7–10]. Information on Algeria was gracefully supplied by Slimane Himouri, Director of the LCTPE (Laboratoire Construction, Transport et Protection de l’Environnement), Université Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Mostaganem, Algeria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaudry, M. National road fatality maxima: why the 1972 cluster?. Securitas Vialis 6, 47–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12615-014-9074-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12615-014-9074-y
Keywords
- Road fatalities
- Road safety modelling ignorance
- 1972–1973 mystery of simultaneous national maxima
- OECD countries
- European Commission 2010 road safety policy
- World Health Organization 2009 global status report on road safety and forecast for 2030
- Road fatalities in Algeria
Palabras clave
- Fallecidos en accidente de tráfico
- Modelo de ignorancia seguridad vial
- 1972–1973 misterio de máximos a nivel nacional en simultáneo
- Países de la OCDE
- Política de seguridad vial de la Comisión Europea 2010
- Organización Mundial de la Salud informe sobre la situación mundial en seguridad vial 2009 y previsiones para 2030
- Fallecidos en accidente de tráfico en Argelia