Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of health-related quality of life decline after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older patients with severe aortic stenosis

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life in patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one-third of patients have poor outcome as death, functional decline or quality of life (QoL) decline. The aim of this study was to determine cardiac and geriatric predictors of physical and mental QoL decline 6 months after a TAVI procedure in patients aged 75 and older.

Methods

Between January 2013 and June 2014, we did a prospective and multicenter study including patients ≥ 75 years old referred for TAVI. The primary outcome was the measure of QoL, assessed by the Short Form 36 survey (SF-36), before and 6 months after the intervention. Association between QoL decline and baseline characteristics including cardiac and geriatric factors was analysed by logistic regression models.

Results

Mean age of the 150 patients studied was 83.7 years old and 56% were men. The primary end point, mean SF-36 physical summary score, significantly improved between baseline and 6-month (33.6 vs. 36.4, p=0.003) whereas mental component score significantly decreased (48.2 vs. 36.4, p-value<0.001). However, patients with presence of depressive symptoms before the intervention had mental QoL improvement at six months (OR 0.04 [0.01-0.19], p-value<0.001) and no significant geriatric predictors were associated with physical QoL decline.

Conclusion

The mental QoL significantly decreased and patients with preoperative depressive symptoms had mental QoL improvement at six months. Researches are needed to confirm that mental QoL of patients with depressive symptoms can be improved by TAVI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table 1
Figure 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2005;26(24):2714–2720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1597–1607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilard M, Eltchaninoff H, Iung B, et al. Registry of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1705–1715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2011;124(18):1964–1972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, Schuler G, et al. 2-year follow-up of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding valve prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(16):1650–1657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoenenberger AW, Stortecky S, Neumann S, et al. Predictors of functional decline in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(9):684–692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold SV, Reynolds MR, Lei Y, et al. Predictors of poor outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) trial. Circulation. 2014;129(25):2682–2690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stortecky S, Schoenenberger AW, Moser A, et al. Evaluation of multidimensional geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(5):489–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ludman PF, Moat N, de Belder MA, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the UK: Temporal Trends, Predictors of Outcome and 6 Year Follow Up: A Report from the UK TAVI Registry, 2007 to 2012. Circulation. 2015. 131(13):1181–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson D, O’Neill D, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d6553.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, et al. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1992;41(3):237–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621–1626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1159–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frendl DM, Ware JE Jr. Patient-reported functional health and well-being outcomes with drug therapy: a systematic review of randomized trials using the SF-36 health survey. Med Care. 2014;52(5):439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):6–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krane M, Deutsch M-A, Piazza N, et al. One-year results of health-related quality of life among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(12):1774–1781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krane M, Deutsch M-A. Quality of life among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J. 2010;160(3):451–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goyal TM, Idler EL, Krause TJ, Contrada RJ. Quality of life following cardiac surgery: impact of the severity and course of depressive symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(5):759–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stafford L, Berk M, Reddy P, Jackson HJ. Comorbid depression and healthrelated quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62(4):401–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thyregod HGH, Steinbrüchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, et al. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(20):2184–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moat NE, Ludman P, de Belder MA, et al. Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in High-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(20):2130–2138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wenaweser P, Stortecky S, Schwander S, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with estimated low or intermediate surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1894–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on noncardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(35):2383–2431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Jama. 1963;185:914–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolinsky FD, Bentler SE, Hockenberry J, et al. Long-term declines in ADLs, IADLs, and mobility among older Medicare beneficiaries. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Khatri PJ, Webb JG, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. Adverse Effects Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-analysis of Contemporary Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(1):35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tse L, Bowering JB, Schwarz SKW, et al. Postoperative delirium following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(1):22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN. Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing. 1994;23(3):182–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vicchio M, De Feo M, Giordano S, Provenzano R, Cotrufo M, Nappi G. Coronary artery bypass grafting associated to aortic valve replacement in the elderly: survival and quality of life. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Geschke K, Fellgiebel A, Laux N, et al. A. Quality of life in dementia: impact of cognition and insight on applicability of the SF-36. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):646–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Sophie Boureau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boureau, A.S., Trochu, J.N., Rouaud, A. et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life decline after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Nutr Health Aging 21, 105–111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0739-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0739-5

Key words

Navigation