Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconciling food and water security objectives of MENA and sub-Saharan Africa: is there a role for large-scale agricultural investments?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The attainment of food and water security rank high on the agendas of governments in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Although the objectives are similar, the underlying drivers, resource endowments and opportunities for achieving them are different. Differences between two regions in natural resource endowment and investment capital stock can, in theory, lead to mutually beneficial trade to achieve desired objectives. Concerns about the recent food crises coupled with the disparity in land and water endowment and investable capital between MENA and SSA have led in recent years to investment in agricultural land in the latter by a number of MENA countries with the aim of producing food. At the same time, many SSA countries seek these investments to infuse capital, technology and know-how into their agricultural sector to improve productivity, food security and rural livelihoods. However, these recent foreign direct agricultural investments have to date performed poorly or have been abandoned without achieving the initial objectives of setting them up. Based on research conducted in selected sub-Saharan countries, this paper analyses the reasons for the failure of these investments. It then reviews a few successful agricultural investments by private sector companies with a long history of operation in SSA. Juxtaposing lessons distilled from failed and successful case studies, the paper argues that large-scale agricultural investments that take advantage of this accumulated knowledge are needed and do have a critical role to play. Such investments, when they also incorporate ecosystems management practices and smallholder inclusive business models in their operations, can serve as appropriate instruments to reconcile the food and water security objectives of both the MENA region and SSA, while promoting sustainable intensification of agriculture and improved rural livelihoods in SSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even though Table 2 refers to total amount of arable land per country, the study countries still rank among those with the largest amounts of underutilized land, excluding forestland, potentially available for agricultural production in SSA (see Chamberlin et al. 2014).

References

  • Abbott, P., & Thomson, R. (1987). Changing agricultural comparative advantage. Agricultural Economics, 1, 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S. M., Jr., & Franco, J. C. (2010). From threat to opportunity? Problems with the idea of a “code of conduct” for land grabbing. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 13, 507–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • CA (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture). (2007). Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, and Colombo: International Water Management Institute.

  • CFS (Committee on World Food Security). (2014). Principles for responsible investment in agriculture and food systems. Rome: CFS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J., Jayne, T. S., & Headey, D. (2014). Scarcity amidst abundance? Reassessing the potential for cropland expansion in Africa. Food Policy, 48, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. (2014). The land grab, finance capital and food restructuring: the case of Egypt. Review of African Political Economy, 41(140), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (2013). Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, P., Jaffe, S., & Okello, J. (2004). Exporting out of Africa – Kenya’s horticultural success story. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2014a). Aquastat database. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm (Accessed 12 January 2015).

  • FAO. (2014b). Coping with water scarcity in the Near East and North Africa. Fact sheet regional conference for the near east (NERC-32). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2015). World Food Situation. FAO Food Price Index. http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/ (Accessed 23 March 2015).

  • FAO, IFAD, & WFP. (2014). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • GDN (Global Development Network). (2012). Managing agricultural commercialization for inclusive growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Briefing Paper Number 1. GDN Agriculture Policy Series.

  • Goldin, I. (1990). Comparative advantage: Theory and application to developing country agriculture. OECD Development Centre. Working Paper No. 16.

  • Halley, S., & Abbott, P. (1986). An investigation of the determinants of agricultural comparative advantage. Research Bulletin 984. West Lafayette: Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, T. S., Chamberlain, J., & Headey, D. D. (2014). Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: a synthesis. Food Policy, 48, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, Y., Bamba, I., Diagne, A., Otsuka, K., & Kajisa, K. (2011). The possibility of a rice green revolution in large-scale irrigation schemes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Research Working Paper 5560. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oya, C. (2013). Methodological reflections on ‘land grab’ databases and the ‘land grab’ literature ‘rush’. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, C., Tyler, G., Hazell, P., Dorward, A., Kydd, J., Stockbridge, M. (2008). Commercial agriculture in Africa: Lessons from success and failure. Background paper for the Competitive Commercial Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (CCAA) study.

  • Qalaa Holdings. (2012). Citadel Capital increases its stake in Wafra to 99.9 %. http://www.qalaaholdings.com/newsroom/news-releases/96 (Accessed 25 January 2015).

  • Qalaa Holdings. (2014). Transformative Investments. Annual Report 2014. http://www.qalaaholdings.com/publications-files/Files/QH-AR14-E.pdf (Accessed 24 July 2015).

  • Rahmato, D. (2011). Land to investors: Large-scale land transfers in Ethiopia. Forum for Social Studies Policy Debates Series No. 1. Addis Ababa.

  • Scoones, I., Hall, R., Borras, S. M., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2013). The politics of evidence: methodologies for understanding the global land rush. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. O., Gyampoh, B., Kizito, F., & Namara, R. (2012). Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. O., Sidibe, Y., Baker, T., Windham-Wright, T., & Gemo, H. (2015). Analysis of impacts of large-scale investments in agriculture on water resources, ecosystems and livelihoods and development of policy options for decision makers. Final project report to UNEP, GRID-Arendal and FAO. Accra: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woertz, E. (2013). Oil for food. The global food crisis and the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Awakening Africa’s sleeping giant: prospects for commercial agriculture in the guinea savannah zone and beyond. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). Growing Africa: Unlocking the potential of agribusiness. AFTFP/AFTAI. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). 2015 World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://wdi.worldbank.org/tables (Accessed 20 April 2015).

  • Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A version of this paper was first presented at a conference on: Tropical Agriculture as “Last Frontier”? Food Import Needs of the Middle East and North Africa, Ecological Risks and New Dimensions of South-South Cooperation with Africa, Latin America and South-East Asia, 29–30 January 2015, Barcelona, Spain. It was jointly organized by OCP Policy Centre, Rabat and CIDOB, the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs. The author gratefully acknowledges the travel support provided by the organizers of that conference and the useful comments received on the paper from conference participants. Thanks are also due to two anonymous referees for useful comments provided on an earlier version of this paper. The author bears responsibility for all remaining errors in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Olalekan Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, T.O. Reconciling food and water security objectives of MENA and sub-Saharan Africa: is there a role for large-scale agricultural investments?. Food Sec. 7, 1199–1209 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0508-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0508-z

Keywords

Navigation