Skip to main content
Log in

Your place or mine? global imbalances in internationalisation and mobilisation in educational professional experience

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International mobility programmes and opportunities have enthusiastically been embraced by universities as part of a growing demand for graduates with global, international and intercultural capital on the part of graduates. In this project, we take two universities, one Australian and one Indonesian, as illustrative case studies of some of the commonalities, differences and, in particular, imbalances, with regard to the conduct of international professional experience in the global north and south. Specifically, a recent visit by Indonesian pre-service teachers was used to inform an upcoming visit by Australian pre-service teachers to Indonesia. We used this opportunity to compare the accessibility of travel for Australian and Indonesian pre-service teachers, as illustrations of in/equality of access for northern and southern learners. We hope that this paper will prompt discussion about global imbalances of opportunity with regard to international experiences. We also hope that our mutual interview process adopted for this study might be a useful research tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Buchanan.

Appendix

Appendix

Mutual interview protocol.

In what ways is the flow of ideas and people between developed and developing nations un/equal?

What are the varying levels of access to mobility of students from developed and developing nations?

How do we understand and describe the ways in which pre-service teachers from developed and developing contexts interface when meeting? Is there an assumption that ‘western’ pedagogies, deemed (rightly or wrongly) to be more ‘student-centred’ than those from Asian contexts, are superior? Is there a neo-colonial deference to pedagogies deemed ‘western’? What do visitors and hosts learn from one another?

Who benefits the most from IPEs?

What language assumptions are implicit in IPEs?

What of implications from shifting global power bases, especially in Asia? Might these changing (socio-)economic realities, more than any well-intended attempts at intercultural understanding on the part of academics, establish new patterns and assumptions in international mobility and its goals?

Implications of (over-?)regulation of western systems?

Is it possible/easy for people separated by culture and distance to become true friends? What, if any, are the barriers to this?

Questions specific to our circumstances: How do Indonesian and Australian students typically view and ‘construct’ one another and their respective countries?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buchanan, J., Widodo, A. Your place or mine? global imbalances in internationalisation and mobilisation in educational professional experience. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 17, 355–364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9432-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9432-y

Navigation