Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of efficiency levels using meta-frontier analysis of global fisheries for the period 1960–2010

  • Original Article
  • Fisheries
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the technical efficiency, meta-frontier, and technological gap ratios of six world fishery regions during the years 1960–2010. We calculated the efficiency level for Europe, Asia, North and Central America, Africa, South America, and Oceania, based on countries from which adequate data were available. While world fish stocks are suffering from overexploitation, and many countries have initiated stock rebuilding plans to overcome this issue, we offer a new solution. Although many country’s efficiency levels are high within their region, on a global scale, few can be considered efficient. This shows that today’s worldwide fishery is facing a lack of cooperation. We hope that by showing the efficiency levels, countries can moderate the over-capacity, which imparts higher costs on the fishery sector, in addition to constrain most of the fisheries to harvest levels below regional maximum sustainable yield levels, while not reducing their economic return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO (2003) Review of state of world fishery resources: inland fisheries. FAO fisheries circular no 942, rev 1 FAO Rome, Italy, pp 60–62

  2. FAO (2009) State of the world’s fisheries and aquaculture 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher TJ et al (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Bank (2009) The sunken billions: the economic justification for fisheries reform. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumaila UR, Khan A, Watson R, Munro G et al (2007) The world trade organization and global fisheries sustainability. Fish Res 88:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anticamara JA, Watson R, Glechu A, Pauly D (2011) Global fishing effort (1950–2010): trends, gaps, and implications. Fish Res 107:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1988) Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. J Econ 38:387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glass JC, McKillop DG, Hyndman N (1995) Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: an empirical analysis of UK universities. J Appl Econom 10:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lovell CAK, Pastor JT (1997) Target setting: an application to a bank branch network. Eur J Oper Res 98:290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Donnell CJ, Van der Westhuizen G (2002) Regional comparisons of banking performance in South Africa. S Afr J Econ 70:485–518

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120:253–281

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayami Y, Ruttan VW (1971) Agricultural development: an international perspective. J Dev Econ 26:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2003) Metafrontier functions for the study of inter-regional productivity differences. J Product Anal 3:153–169

    Google Scholar 

  15. Assaf A, Barros CP, Josiassen A (2010) Hotel efficiency: a bootstrapped metafrontier approach. Int J Hosp Manag 29:468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang YJ, Chen KH, Yang CH (2010) Cost efficiency and optimal scale of electricity distribution firms in Taiwan: an application of metafrontier analysis. Energy Econ 32:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh DH (2010) A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index. Energy Econ 32:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. FAO (2011) State of world fisheries and aquaculture. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm Accessed 17 Feb 2014

  19. Battese GE, Rao DSP (2002) Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic Metafrontier function. Int J Bus Econ 1:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empir Econ 34:231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nyemeck J, Nkamleu GB (2006) Potentiel de productivite et efficacite technique du secteur agricole en Afrique. Can J Agric Econ 54(2006):361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coelli T (1996) A guide to DEAP v 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Group 96/09

  23. Froese R, Pauly D (2003) Warnsignale aus Nordsee und Wattenmeer-eine aktuelle Umweltbilanz. In: JLozán JL, Rachor E, Reise K, Sündermann J, Westernhagen VH (ed) Warnsignale aus Nordsee und Wattenmeer—eine aktuelle Umweltbilanz, GEO, Hamburg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amaj Rahimi Midani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, SG., Rahimi Midani, A. Comparison of efficiency levels using meta-frontier analysis of global fisheries for the period 1960–2010. Fish Sci 81, 247–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-014-0839-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-014-0839-2

Keywords

Navigation