Obstacles and supports related to the use of educational technologies: the role of technological expertise, gender, and age
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In order for institutions of higher education to provide essential technology resources and encourage the adoption of educational technologies, it is vital to gather information about the barriers their users encounter and the supports they find most helpful. The purpose of this study is to better understand how differences in user traits (e.g., age, gender, and technological expertise) may be impacting the use of technologies to support instruction. In this study, we report data from a university-wide survey of faculty at the University of Washington (N = 547). Study results indicate that individuals with technical expertise at the “beginner” level rely on different sources of support and encounter different barriers than do individuals at the “expert” level, even after controlling for gender and age. Our data demonstrate the importance of recognizing the range of expertise that exist among users when assessing barriers and implementing programs to support faculty in the adoption of educational technologies.
- Anderson, T, Varnhagen, S, Campbell, K (1998) Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: Contrasting earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 28: pp. 71-98
- Chandler, D. (2000). Technological or media determinism. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tecdet.htm.
- Hagner, PR, Schneebeck, CA Engaging the faculty. In: Barone, CA, Hagner, PR eds. (2001) Technology-enhanced teaching and learning: Leading and supporting the transformation on your campus. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 1-12
- Lane, C. A., & Lyle, H. (2009). The differing technology support needs of beginner and expert users: Survey findings from the University of Washington. ED-MEDIA 2009 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications.
- Lane, C. A., Lyle, H., Fournier, J., & Connell, C. (2009). Learning and scholarly technologies at the University of Washington: Report on the 2008 faculty, teaching assistant, and student surveys. Retrieved from (http://www.washington.edu/lst/research_development/research_projects/LSTsurvey.html).
- Lane, C. A., & Yamashiro, G. (2006). Educational technology at the University of Washington: Report on the 2005 instructor and student surveys. Retrieved from http://catalyst.washington.edu/research_development/papers/2006/edtech_2005report.html.
- Leggett, WP, Persichitte, KA (1998) Blood, sweat, and tears: 50 years of technology implementation obstacles. Tech Trends 43: pp. 33-36 CrossRef
- Lofstrom, E, Nevgi, A (2007) From strategic planning to meaningful learning: Diverse perspectives on the development of web-based teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technologies 38: pp. 312-324 CrossRef
- Miller, JW, Martineau, LP, Clark, RC (2000) Technology infusion and higher education: Changing teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education 24: pp. 227-241 CrossRef
- Muilenburg, L, Berge, ZL (2001) Barriers to distance education: A factor-analytic study. The American Journal of Distance Education 15: pp. 7-22 CrossRef
- Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE E-book.
- Pajo, K, Wallace, C (2001) Barriers to the uptake of web-based technology by university teachers. The Journal of Distance Education 16: pp. 70-84
- Peluchette, JV, Rust, KA (2005) Technology use in the classroom: Preferences of management faculty members. Journal of Education for Business 80: pp. 200-205 CrossRef
- Perkins, DN (1985) The fingertip effect: How information processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher 14: pp. 11-17
- Rogers, EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York
- Rogers, DL (2000) A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educational Technology Review 33: pp. 19-27
- Rogers, P (2000) Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22: pp. 455-472 CrossRef
- Rousseau, GK, Rogers, WA (1998) Computer usage patterns of university faculty members across the life span. Computers in Human Behavior 14: pp. 417-428 CrossRef
- Sahin, I, Thompson, A (2007) Analysis of factors that influence faculty members’ technology adoption level. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15: pp. 167-190
- Sax, L. (2000). An overview of the 1998–99 faculty norms. Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at UCLA.
- Spodark, E (2003) Five obstacles to technology integration at a small Liberal Arts college. THE Journal 30: pp. 14-24
- Spotts, T (1999) Discriminating factors in faculty use of instructional technology in higher education. Educational Technology & Society 2: pp. 92-99
- Spotts, T, Bowman, M, Mertz, C (1997) Gender and use of instructional technologies: A study of university faculty. Higher Education 34: pp. 421-436 CrossRef
- Surry, DW, Land, SM (2000) Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Training International 37: pp. 145-153
- Vodanovich, SJ, Piotrowski, C (2005) Faculty attitudes towards web-based instruction: Limited use and obstacles to implementation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 33: pp. 309-318 CrossRef
- Zhou, G, Xu, J (2007) Adoption of educational technology: How does gender matter?. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19: pp. 140-153
- Obstacles and supports related to the use of educational technologies: the role of technological expertise, gender, and age
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 38-59
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Educational technology adoption
- User traits
- Obstacles to technology use
- Supports for technology use
- Technological expertise