Abstract
The present study aims to find out the crustal thickness, V P/V S ratio, and Poisson’s ratio beneath the Indian School of Mines (ISM) broadband seismic station using receiver function analysis. The station is located at latitude 23.82° N and longitude 86.44° E in the mid-eastern part of the Chotanagpur Plateau under the Eastern Indian Shield region. A total of 300 teleseismic events (M ≥ 6.0), recorded at the ISM station during 2007–2012, were compiled, and 97 good-quality events selected for the analysis. Receiver function analysis and H–k stacking method are used to determine the crustal thickness (H) and V P/V S ratio. The depth of Mohorovičić (Moho) discontinuity below the station is estimated to be ∼42.2 km with an average V P/V S ratio of ∼1.92. We also find the presence of Conrad discontinuity at a depth of ∼20 km. The computed average Poisson’s ratio of ∼0.31 for the whole crust beneath the ISM broadband station is relatively higher and might be indicating the presence of mafic rocks or partial melt near the Moho. Similar observations were also reported from different segments of the Son-Narmada-Tapi mega-shear zone, a westward extended part of the present study area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansari MA, Khan PK (2014) Occurrences of damaging earthquakes between the Himachal and Darjeeling Himalayas: tectonic implications. Acta Geophys. doi:10.2478/s11600-013-0190-5
Bhattacharjee N, Ray J, Ganguly S, Saha A (2012) Mineralogical study of gabbro-anorthosite from Dumka, Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex, Eastern Indian Shield. J Geol Soc India 80:481–492
Bhattacharya SN (1971) Seismic surface-wave dispersion and crust mantle structure of Indian Peninsula. Indian J Met Geophys 22:179–186
Bhattacharya BB, Shalivahan (2002) The electric moho underneath Eastern Indian Craton. Geophys Res Lett 29:14/1–14/4
Bose MK (1999) Geochemistry of the metabasics and related rocks from the eastern part of the Proterozoic Singhbhum mobile belt, eastern India—petrogenitic implications. Indian J Geol 71:213–234
Bose MK (2009) Precambrian mafic magmatism in the Singhbhum craton, eastern India. J Geol Soc India 73:13–35
Chatterjee N, Ghose NC (2011) Extensive early Neoproterozoic high-grade metamorphism in North Chotanagpur Gneissic Complex of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Gondwana Res 20:362–379
Christensen NI (1996) Poisson’s ratio and crustal seismology. J Geophys Res 101:3139–3156
Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal K, Venkataraman NV, Dasgupta S, Sural B, Harendranath L, Mazumder K, Sanyal S, Roy A, Das LK, Mishra PS, Harsh G (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. In: Narula PL, Acharyya SK, Banerjee J (eds) p 87
Gokarn SG, Rao CK, Gupta G, Singh BP, Yamashita M (2001) Deep crustal structure in central India using magnetotelluric studies. Geophys J Int 144:685–694
Kayal JR, Srivastava VK, Bhattacharya SN, Khan PK, Chatterjee R (2009) Source parameters and focal mechanisms of local earthquakes: single broadband observatory at ISM Dhanbad. J Geol Soc India 4:413–419
Kayal JR, Srivastava VK, Kumar P, Chatterjee R, Khan PK (2011) Evaluation of crustal and upper mantle structures using receiver function analysis: ISM broadband observatory data. J Geol Soc India 78:76–80
Keir D, Bastow ID, Whaler KA, Daly E, Cornwell DG, Hautot S (2009) Lower crustal earthquakes near the Ethiopian rift induced by magmatic processes. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 10:1–10. doi:10.1029/2009GC002382
Krishnaswamy VS (1962) Significance of the Moradabad Fault in the Indogangetic basin and other faults in the Sub-Himalaya in relation to the Ramganga River Project. Proc 2nd Symp Earthquake Eng, Roorkee Univ 411–422
Kumar MR, Saul J, Sarkar D, Kind R, Shukla KA (2001) Crustal structure of the Indian shield: new constraints from teleseismic receiver functions. Geophys Res Lett 28:1339–1342
Langston CA (1979) Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves. J Geophys Res 84:4749–4762
Ligorria JP, Ammon CJ (1999) Iterative deconvolution of teleseismic seismograms and receiver function estimation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1395–1400
Manglik A, Singh RN (2002) Thermomechanical structure of the central Indian shield: constraints from deep crustal seismicity. Curr Sci 82:1151–1157
Mooney WD, Rao VV, Reddy PR, Chulick GS, Detweiler ST (2005) Comparison of the deep crustal structure and seismicity of North America with the Indian subcontinent. Curr Sci 88:1639–1651
Naganjaneyulu K, Dhanunjaya GN, Someswara MR, Ravisankar K, Kishore SRK, Murthy DN, Veeraswamy K, Harinarayana T (2010) Deep crustal electromagnetic structure of central India tectonic zone and its implications. Phys Earth Planet Inter 181:60–68
Naqvi SM, Rogers JJW (1987) Precambrian geology of India. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 233 p
Nyblade AA, Langston CA (1995) East African earthquakes below 20 km depth and their implications for crustal structure. Geophys J Int 121:49–62
Pandey MR, Molnar P (1988) The distribution of intensity of the Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 15 January 1934 and bounds on the extent of the rupture zone. J Geol Soc Nepal 5:22–44
Patro BPK, Harinarayana T, Sastry RS, Rao M, Manoj C, Naganjaneyulu K, Sarma SVS (2005) Electrical imaging of Narmada–Son Lineament Zone, Central India from magnetotellurics. Phys Earth Planet Inter 148:215–232
Phinney RA (1964) Structure of the Earth’s crust from spectral behaviour of long-period body waves. J Geophys Res 69:2997–3017
Qureshy MN (1970) Relation of gravity to elevation, geology and tectonics of India: Proc. II UMP Symp. Hyderabad, pp 1–23
Rao BR (2000) Historical seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian Peninsular Shield. J Seismol 4:247–258
Rao GV, Rao RUM (1983) Heat flow in Indian Gondwana basins and heat production of their basement rocks. Tectonophysics 91:105–117
Rao NP, Tsukuda T, Kosuga M, Bhatia SC, Suresh G (2003) Deep lower crustal earthquakes in central India: inferences from analysis of regional broadband data of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur earthquake. Geophys J Int 148:1–12
Sarkar AN (1982) Precambrian tectonic evaluation of eastern India: a model of conversing microplates. Tectonophysics 86:363–397
Shanker R, Guha SK, Seth NN, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Nandy R, Jangi BL, Muthuraman K (1991) Geothermal atlas of India. Geol Sur India, Spl Pub 19, pp 144
Tarkov AP, Vavakin VV (1982) Poisson’s ratio behavior in various crystalline rocks: application to the study of the Earth’s interior. Phys Earth Planet Inter 29:24–29
Weaver BL (1990) Early Precambrian basic rocks of India. In: Hall RP, Hughes DJ (eds) Early Precambrian basic magmatism. Blackie, Glasgow, pp 339–351
Zandt G, Ammon CJ (1995) Continental crust composition constrained by measurements of crustal Poisson’s ratio. Nature 374:15
Zandt G, Myers SC, Wallace TC (1995) Crust and mantle structure across the basin and range-Colorado Plateau boundary at 37°N latitude and implications for Cenozoic extensions mechanism. J Geophys Res 100:10529–10548
Zhu L, Kanomari H (2000) Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J Geophys Res 105:2969–2980
Zhu L, Zeng RS, Wu FT, Owens TJ, Randall GE (1993) Preliminary study of crust-upper mantle structure of the Tibetan plateau by using broadband teleseismic body waveforms. Acta Seismol Sin 6:305–316
Acknowledgments
The first author would like to thank Dr. P. Kumar, Scientist, National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, for his valuable support during processing and interpretation of the data. The authors are also thankful to Shri Raj Kumar Prasad for providing the earthquake data recorded at the ISM-BB station. The study was funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India, New Delhi. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewer for his suggestion, which has improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, N.K., Khan, P.K. & Bhukta, K.K. Nature of the Moho in the mid-eastern part of the Chotanagpur Plateau, India, from a receiver function perspective. Arab J Geosci 8, 5669–5675 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1648-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1648-8