Abstract
Stress presents an interesting case for the application of medicalization theory. From the 1950s to the 1980s, stress became an established, if not fully deciphered, component of the matrix within which illness developed, as understood by physicians and patients, scientists, and laypeople alike. While the various iterations of the medicalization thesis are useful for analyzing the information flows between the multiplicity of actors engaged in the production and interpretation of the stress concept, they cannot account for all aspects of the evolution of the incorporation of stress into both the medical lexicon and the popular vernacular. To account for the significance of physical explanations for the physiological and pathological effects of stress on the body, this essay expands the model of medicalization to include biologization. This modified model is further deployed as an analytical framework to develop the central argument of this essay: that the medicalization of stress allowed for an expansion of therapeutic options available to practitioners and recipients of mainstream medicine by opening up space for the legitimation of alternative healing practices. Biologization looks to the system of ideas on which medical approaches are based to explain how the reductionist project to find molecular mechanisms of disease causality brought stress and other social and psychological phenomena into the domain of medicine. This expanded model of medicalization can usefully characterize late twentieth and early twenty-first century attitudes toward a wide variety of human disorders whose causes have been found to be molecular in origin. By folding biology into the medicalization thesis, social scientists can train a fresh analytical lens on the role of medicine in recent and contemporary American life.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a discussion of the differences between American and British sociologists’ conceptions of medicalization, see Clarke et al. 2010, 20–22.
PubMed search performed on May 10, 2012.
Amazon search performed on May 10, 2012.
References
Adler, J. 1999. Stress. Newsweek 133: 56–63.
Andes, K.L. 1979. What stress can do to your body. Mademoiselle 85: 80.
Anonymous. 1979. What stress can do to mind and body. Good Housekeeping 188: 248–249.
Anonymous. 1975. Stress. Mademoiselle 81: 138.
Barke, M., R. Fribush, and P.N. Stearns. 2000. Nervous breakdown in 20th-century American culture. Journal of Social History 33: 565–584.
Clarke, A.E., L. Mamo, J.R. Fosket, J.E. Fishman, and J.K. Shim. 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health and illness in the U.S.. Durham: Duke University Press.
Clarke, A.E., L. Mamo, J.E. Fishman, J.K. Shim, and J.R. Fosket. 2003. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and US biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68(April): 161–194.
Conrad, P. 2005. The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46(March): 3–14.
Conrad, P. 2007. The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Crawford, R. 1980. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services 10(3): 365–388.
Davis, J. E. 2006. How medicalization lost its way. Transaction: Social Science and Modern Society 43(6): 51–56.
Ehrenreich, B. 1979. Is success dangerous to your health? Ms. 7:51–54, 97–101.
Fox, R.C. 1977. The medicalization and demedicalization of American Society. Daedalus 106: 9–22.
Hamburg, D. A. 1982. Foreword: An outlook on stress research and health. In Stress and Human Health: Analysis and Implications of Research. A Study by the Institute of Medicine/National Academy of Sciences, Elliott, G. R. and Eisdorfer, C., eds. New York: Springer.
Illich, I. 1982. Medicalization and primary care. Journal of the Royal College of Medical Practitioners 32(August): 463–470.
Lowenberg, J.S., and F. Davis. 1994. Beyond medicalisation-demedicalisation: The case of holistic health. Sociology of Health & Illness 16(5): 579–599.
Osler, W. 1910. The Lumleian lectures on angina pectoris. Lancet 175: 697–702.
Riska, E. 2000. The rise and fall of Type A man. Social Science and Medicine 51: 1665–1674.
Rose, N. 2007. Beyond medicalization. Lancet 369: 700–701.
Rosenberg, C. 1972. Introduction to Beard, G. M. American Nervousness: Its Causes and Consequences. New York: Arno Press.
Sadler, W. S. 1925. Americanitis is accused of wasting many lives. New York Times (January 7), X9.
Selye, H. 1956. The stress of life. Vol. 5. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Suinn, R.M. 1976. How to break the vicious cycle of stress. Psychology Today 10: 60.
Talmey, A. 1957. Remaking your idea of stress. Vogue 129: 54–55.
Watkins, E. S. (2014). Stress and the American vernacular: Popular perceptions of disease causality. In Stress, shock, and adaptation in the twentieth century, Cantor, D. and Ramsden, E., eds. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Zola, I.K. 1972. Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociological Review 20: 487–504.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Adele Clarke and Nancy Tomes for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, E.S. An Investigation into the Medicalization of Stress in the Twentieth Century. Medicine Studies 4, 29–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12376-013-0082-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12376-013-0082-7