Skip to main content
Log in

The SEA and Big-S Models for Managing Geosites as Resources for Local Communities in the Context of Rural Geoparks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Alexandrowicz Z (2006) Geoparks—nature protection category aiding the promotion of geotourism (Polish perspectives). Geoturystyka 2:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrășanu A (2007a) Buzău Land Geopark. Directions for socio-economic development. Geomedia Publications, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrășanu A (ed) (2007b) Journey into Buzău Land Geopark—a guide. Accent Print Publishing, Suceava

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrășanu A (2008) Buzău Geopark. Building a new aspiring Geopark. Proceedings of the 3rd International UNESCO Conference on Geoparks. Proceedings book, Osnabrück, p 15

  • Andrășanu A (2010) Buzău Land Geopark. Steps in building a new Geopark in Romania. Proceedings XIX Congress of the Carpathian-Balkan Association Special Volume 100:503–513

  • Baca I, Schuster E (2011) Listing, evaluation and touristic utilisation of geosites containing archaeological artefacts. case study: Ciceu ridge (Bistrița-Năsăud County, Romania. Revista Geografica Academica 5:5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Baciu C, Caracausi A, Etiope G, Italiano F (2007) Mud volcanoes and methane seeps in Romania: main features and gas flux. Annals of Geophysics 50:501–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Bădescu D (2005) The tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the East Carpathians during the Mesozoic and Neozoic times (in Romanian). Ed. Economică, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2009) The importance of Geoparks for the geosciences teaching and interpretation. Geologia USP Special Publications 5:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha, J (2015) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage doi:10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A, Albertos JAC (2011) A statistical approach to the validation and optimization of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage 3:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleal CJ, Thomas BA, Bevins RE, Wimbledon WAP (1999) Geosites. an international initiative. Geology Today 15:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu I, Săndulescu M, Brandabur T (1968) The Geological Map of Romania, 1:200,000 scale Covasna sheet. The Geological Institute of Romania, Bucharest, sheet 29

  • Eder W, Patzak M (2004) Geoparks—geological attractions: a tool for public educaiton, recreation and sustainable development. Episodes 27:162–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Etiope G, Baciu C, Caracausi A, Italiano F, Cosma C (2004) Gas flux to the atmosphere from mud volcanoes in eastern Romania. Terra Nov. 16:179–194

  • Farsani NT, Coelho C, Costa C (2011) Geotourism and geoparks as gateways to socio-cultural sustainability in Qeshm rural areas, Iran. Asia Pacific J Tourism Res 17:30–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou-Nikolakis P, Iliopoulos G (2012) Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage 4:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 119:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorescu D (1925) Zăcămintele ambrifere din comuna Colți, jud. Buzău (in Romanian). Anuarul Mineralogic al României 8:318

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini G (1994) Actes du premier symposium international sur la protection du patrimoine géologique. Mémoires de la Société géologique de France 165, pp 276

  • Martini G (2009) Geoparks… a vision for the future. Geologia USP Special Publications 5:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mînzală I, Beșliu V (2013) Mînzălești – Județul Buzău. ArtPress Consulting, Buzău

    Google Scholar 

  • Partal C, Palcu D, Apachiței L (2012) The roads to fairytales—Buzău Land (in Romanian). Amanda Edit Publishing, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Gemorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 2:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu I, Ghiurcă V, Nica V (1989) Paleobotanical and palynological researches on the Lower Oligocene amber and amber bearing formations at Colți—Buzău. In: Petrescu I (ed) The Oligocene from the Transylvanian Basin, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania, pp 183–198

  • Popa R-G, Popa D-A, Andrășanu A, Haukeland PI, Iuga A (2015) Of earth and man in Buzău Land. Ars Docendi Publishing, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybár P (2010) Assessment of attractiveness (value) of geotouristic objects. Acta Geoturistica 2:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP, Benton MJ, Black RE, Bridgeland DR, Cleal CJ, Cooper RG, May VJ (1995) The development of a methodology for the selection of British geological sites for conservation. Part 1. Modern Geology 20:159–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Xun Z, Ting Z (2003) The socio-economic beenfit of establishing national Geoparks in China. Episodes 26:302–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2004) The European Geoparks Network, Geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes 27:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N and Martini G (2003) Introduction to the European Geoparks Network. In: Zouros N, Martini G and Frey M-L (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd European Geoparks Network Meeting: Lesvos, Natural History Museum of the Lesvos Petrifed Forest, pp 17-21

  • Zouros N and McKeever P (2009) Tools for Earth Heritage Protection and Sustainable Local Development, European Geoparks. In: Zouros N, Ramsay T, McKeever P and Patzak M (eds) European Geoparks, earth heritage protection and sustainable local development - The Natural History Museum of the Lesvos Petrified on behalf of the European Geoparks Network, SIGRI LESVOS, Greece GR-81103, pp. 15-30

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has received funding from the EEA Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 under the GeoSust project contract no 22 SEE/30.06.2014. We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for useful comments and Dr. Kevin Page for editorial handling that improved our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Răzvan-Gabriel Popa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Popa, RG., Popa, DA. & Andrășanu, A. The SEA and Big-S Models for Managing Geosites as Resources for Local Communities in the Context of Rural Geoparks. Geoheritage 9, 175–186 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0192-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0192-1

Keywords

Navigation