Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of machining quality due to the initial residual stress redistribution of aerospace structural parts made of low-density aluminium alloy rolled plates

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the machining of thick, large and complex aluminium parts, the redistribution of initial residual stresses is the main reason for machining errors such as dimensional variations and the post-machining distortions. These errors can lead to the rejection of the parts or to additional conforming operations increasing production costs. It is therefore a requirement to predict potential geometrical and dimensional errors resulting from a given machining process plan and in taking into consideration the redistribution of the residual stresses. A specific finite element tool which allows to predict the behaviour of the workpiece during machining due to its changing geometry and to fixture-workpiece contacts has been developed. This numerical tool uses a material removal approach which enables to simulate the machining of parts with complex geometries. In order to deal with industrial problems this numerical tool has been developed for parallel computing, allowing the study of parts with large dimensions. In this paper, the approach developed to predict the machining quality is presented. First, the layer removal method used to determine the initial residual stress profiles of an AIRWARE 2050-T84 alloy rolled plate is introduced. Experimental results obtained are analysed and the same layer removal method is simulated to validate the residual stress profiles and to test the accuracy of the developed numerical tool. The machining of a part taken from this rolled plate is then performed (experimentally and numerically). The machining quality obtained is compared, showing a good agreement, thus validating the numerical tool and the developed approach. This study also demonstrates the importance of taking into account the mechanical behaviour of the workpiece due to the redistribution of the initial residual stresses during machining when defining a machining process plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asante J (2008) A combined contact elasticity and finite element-based model for contact load and pressure distribution calculation in a frictional workpiece-fixture system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(5–6):578–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerutti X, Mocellin K (2014) Parallel finite element tool to predict distortion induced by initial residual stresses during machining of aeronautical parts. Int J Mater Form. doi:10.1007/s12289-014-1164-0

  3. Chenot J (1989) Three dimensional finite element modeling of forging process. In: Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications, pp. 793–816. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Held in Barcelona

  4. Das S, Chandra U (1999) “Residual stress and distortion,” in handbook of aluminum metallurgy: processes and equipment, vol 1. G.E. Totten and D.S. Mackenzie, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Denkena B, Boehnke D, Len L (2008) Machining induced residual stress in structural aluminum parts. Prod Eng 2(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Denkena B, Leon LD (2009) Milling induced residual stresses in structural parts out of forged aluminium alloys. Int J Mach Mach Mater 4(4):335–344. doi:10.1504/IJMMM.2008.023717

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denkena B, de Leon Garcia L (2007) Fem-simulation of high-performance-milling. In: Proceeding of the CIRP Conference on modelling of machining operations, Sicily

  8. Fourment L, Chenot JL, Mocellin K (1999) Numerical formulations and algorithms for solving contact problems in metal forming simulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(9):1435–1462

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Heymes F, Commet B, Dubost B, Lassince P, Lequeu P, Raynaud GM (1997) Development of new al alloys for distortion free machined aluminium aircraft components. ASM International(USA), 249–255

  10. Jeanmart P, Bouvaist J (1985) Finite element calculation and measurement of thermal stresses in quenched plates of high–strength 7075 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Technol 1(10):765–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lequeu P, Lassince P, Warner T, Raynaud GM (2010) Engineering for the future: weight saving and cost reduction initiatives. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 73:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lequeu P, Smith K, Danielou A (2010) Aluminum-copper-lithium alloy 2050 developed for medium to thick plate. J Mater Eng Perform 19(6):841–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li B, Melkote SN (1999) Improved workpiece location accuracy through fixture layout optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(6):871–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma K, Goetz R, Svrivatsa S (2010) Modeling of residual stress and machining distortion in aerospace components. ASM Handbook, Metals Process Simulation 22B:386–407

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rai JK, Xirouchakis P (2008) Finite element method based machining simulation environment for analyzing part errors induced during milling of thin-walled components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(6):629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schultz R, Karabin M (2002) Characterization of machining distortion by strain energy density and stress range. In: 6th European conference on residual stresses, Materials Science Forum, vol 404–407, pp 61–68

  17. Sim W (2010) Challenges of residual stress and part distortion in the civil airframe industry. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop 5:446–455

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tandon R, Green DJ (1990) Residual stress determination using strain gage measurements. J Am Ceram Soc 73(9):2628–2633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang ZT, Liu ZQ, Ai X (2007) Optimization of bulkhead processing sequence for multi-frame monolithic components by fem. Adv Mater Res 24–25:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Treuting RG, Read WTJ (1951) A mechanical determination of biaxial residual stress in sheet materials. J Appl Phys 22(2):130–134

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Der Veen S, Heymes F, Boselli J, Lequeu P, Lassince P (2006) Low internal stress al-zn-cu-mg plates. US Patent App. 11/299, 683

  22. Virkar AV (1990) Determination of residual stress profile using a strain gage technique. J Am Ceram Soc 73 (7):2100–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang SP, Padmanaban S (2004) A new approach for fem simulation of nc machining processes. AIP Conf Proc 712(1):1371–1376. doi:10.1063/1.1766720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei Y, Wang X (2007) Computer simulation and experimental study of machining deflection due to original residual stress of aerospace thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3–4):260–265. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0470-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Li M, Li K (2013) Comparison and analysis of main effect elements of machining distortion for aluminum alloy and titanium alloy aircraft monolithic component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–9. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5431-x

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is done in the framework of the OFELIA project, labelled by the “ViaMéca Competitiveness Cluster”, gathering several industrial partners (Constellium, Aubert & Duval and REXIAA) and research laboratories (IFMA, SPIN and CEMEF). The authors are thankful for the financial aid to this project supplied by the French Ministry of Industry and also thank S. Hassini and Prof. E. Duc from IFMA for the experimental machining tests and all the partners of this project for their help and collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Cerutti.

Appendix: The redistribution of the residual stresses and the principle of the layer removal method

Appendix: The redistribution of the residual stresses and the principle of the layer removal method

Let h and b denote respectively the height and width of a panel sampled from a rolled plate. A strain gauge has been bonded to it. Assuming plane stress conditions (σ z z =0), the strains ε x x and ε y y in the x- and y-directions can be expressed as

$$ \varepsilon_{xx} = \frac{\sigma_{xx} - \nu \sigma_{yy}}{E} \quad\quad \varepsilon_{yy} = \frac{\sigma_{yy} - \nu \sigma_{xx}}{E} $$
(5)

where σ x x and σ y y are the stresses in the x- and y-directions.

In order to simplify the problem presented in this introduction, the assumption that σ x x =σ y y =σ(z) is made. σ(z) therefore represents the residual stress profiles which evolve only through the thickness of the plate. Using this assumption the strains in both the x- and y-directions are given by

$$ \varepsilon(z) = \frac{(1-\nu)\sigma(z)}{E} $$
(6)

The forces and bending moments associated with the initial residual stress profiles being balanced, the following conditions can be written

$$ \begin{array}{ll} F_{x} = F_{y} = b{{\int}_{0}^{h}}\sigma(z) dz = 0\\ M_{x} = M_{y} = b{{\int}_{0}^{h}}\sigma(z)z dz = 0 \end{array} $$
(7)

with F x and F y being the forces and M x and M y the bending moments in the x- and y-directions.

When the material is removed layer by layer, a new state of equilibrium is reached and therefore a new residual stress profile is obtained. If one layer with a thickness of a is removed, the new residual stress σ can be expressed as

$$ \sigma^{\prime}(z) = \sigma(z) + \sigma_{l1}(a) $$
(8)

with σ l1(a) being a uniform balancing stress due to the removal of the first layer.

Considering balanced forces in the resulting specimen, the following equation can be written

$$ b{\int}_{0}^{h-a}\sigma^{\prime}(z) dz = 0 $$
(9)

Whereas the forces will be balanced, the bending moments will not be, due to the new asymmetric residual stress profile. A moment has to be created to counterbalance the moment \(M(a) = b{\int }_{0}^{h-a}\sigma ^{\prime }(z)z dz \ne 0\) [22]. The new residual stress profile that will satisfy both the force and moment equilibrium can be written as

$$ \sigma_{new}(z) = \sigma^{\prime}(z) + \frac{M(a)\left( \frac{h-a}{2}-z\right)}{I} $$
(10)

with I the moment of inertia expressed as

$$I = \frac{b\times(h-a)^{3}}{12} $$

The sample will deform due to the redistribution of the residual stresses and due to the re-equilibrium of the forces and moments. Figure 21 illustrates the evolution of the residual stress profile, starting from the initial residual stress profile σ(z) to the residual stress profile allowing to obtain the force equilibrium σ (z) and then the residual stress profile allowing to fulfil both the force and moment equilibrium σ n e w (z). It is the re-equilibrium of the moment which will then provoke distortions as also illustrated in Fig. 21.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Illustration of the residual stress redistribution after the removal of a layer with a simplified residual stress distribution: (a) the initial residual stress profile (b) the residual stress profile after the layer removal with only balanced forces (c) the new residual stress profile after the layer removal respecting both force and moment equilibrium

The strain gauge is used to measure the strain linked to the redistribution of the residual stresses. It is bonded to the center of the lower surface of the sample and measures the evolution of the strain after each removal of a layer. Using this method, authors in [10, 18, 22] have demonstrated that it is possible to link the initial residual stress profiles to the measured strain. Equation 11 represents this relation and gives the measured strain depending on the thickness of the layer removed. For more details on this technique and the theoretical analysis, readers can refer to [18, 22].

$$ \varepsilon(a) = \frac{1-\nu}{E(h-a)^{2}}{\int}^{h-a}_{0}[6z-4(h-a)]\,\sigma(z)\,dz $$
(11)

with ε(a) being the strain detected by the strain gauge due to the removal of a layer of thickness a and σ(z) the initial residual stress profile.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerutti, X., Arsene, S. & Mocellin, K. Prediction of machining quality due to the initial residual stress redistribution of aerospace structural parts made of low-density aluminium alloy rolled plates. Int J Mater Form 9, 677–690 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1254-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1254-7

Keywords

Navigation