Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian potential game to illustrate heterogeneity in cost/benefit characteristics

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We employ the theory of Bayesian potential games to characterize pure-strategy equilibria of a Bayesian game with finite type structures, taking into account the cost/benefit features of agents. Building on a standard model of oligopolistic competition also applicable to environmental issues such as profit maximization in presence of an externality affecting all players, we rely on types to describe their heterogeneity. When the damage functions are additively separable, the potential provides necessary and sufficient conditions to ensure monotonicity of pure strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The technical similarities are shown in Monderer and Shapley (1996).

  2. A partial order consists of a binary relation defined on a set indicating that, given two distinct elements in the set, one of them precedes the other. Such a relation is called a partial order to reflect the fact that not every pair of elements in the set need be related: in other words, there may exist a couple of elements such that none of them precedes the other. We will use a partial order on couples consisting of positive numbers and functions.

  3. Given two sets \(X, Y,\) the notation \(X^Y\) indicates the set of functions from \(Y\) to \(X, X^Y =\left\{ f|f:Y\longrightarrow X\right\}\)

  4. In the Examples in Sect. 4 such issue will be discussed after computing the equilibrium strategies.

References

  • Bahn O, Breton M, Sbragia L, Zaccour G (2009) Stability of international environmental agreements: an illustration with asymmetrical countries. Int Trans Oper Res 16:307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balder E (1997) Remarks on Nash equilibria for games with additively coupled payoffs. Econ Theory 9:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzei R, Mallozzi L, Tijs SH (2003) Supermodular games and potential games. J Math Econ 39(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton M, Zaccour G, Zahaf M (2006) A game-theoretic formulation of joint implementation of environmental projects. Eur J Oper Res 168(1):221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright E, Wooders M (2009) On purification of equilibrium in Bayesian games and expost Nash equilibrium. Int J Game Theory 38:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einy E, Moreno D, Shitovitz B (2003) The value of public information in a Cournot duopoly. Games Econ Behav 44:272–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einy E, Haimanko O, Moreno D, Shitovitz B (2010) On the existence of Bayesian Cournot equilibrium. Games Econ Behav 68:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facchini G, van Megen F, Borm P, Tijs S (1997) Congestion models and weighted Bayesian potential games. Theory Decis 42(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippiadis E (2011) Three essays on the environment, Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University

  • Germain M, Toint P, Tulkens H, Zeeuw AJ (2003) Transfer to sustain core-theoretic cooperation in tnternational stock pollutant control. J Econ Dyn Control 28(1):79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germain M, Tulkens H, Magnus A (2010) Dynamic core-theoretic cooperation in a two-dimensional international environmental model. Math Soc Sci 59(2):208–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen S, Martín-Herrán G, Zaccour G (2010) Dynamic games in the economics and management of pollution. Environ Model Assess 15(6):433–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallozzi L (2012) An application of optimization theory to the study of equilibria for games: a survey. Cent J Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10100-012-0245-8

  • McAdams D (2003) Isotone equilibrium in games of incomplete information. Econometrica 71:1191–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer D, Shapley LS (1996) Potential games. Games Econ Behav 14:124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H, Ray I, Gupta SS (2013) Coarse correlated equilibria in an abatement game. Department of Economics, University of Birminghma, Discussion Paper No. 13–11

  • Neyman A (1997) Correlated equilibrium and potential games. Int J Game Theory 26(2):223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrone F, Pusillo L, Tijs SH (2007) Multicriteria games and potentials. Top 15:138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg B (1998) Almost all equilibria in dominant stratgies are coalition-proof. Econ Lett 60:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray I, Gupta SS (2013) Coarse correlated equilibria in linear duopoly games. Int J Game Theory 42(2):541–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reny PJ (2011) On the existence of monotone pure-strategy equilibria in Bayesian games. Econometrica 79(2):499–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm WH (2007) Pigouvian pricing and stochastic evolutionary implementation. J Econ Theory 132(1):367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ui T (2009) Bayesian potentials and information structures: team decision problems revisited. Int J Game Theory 5(3):271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zandt T, Vives X (2007) Monotone equilibria in Bayesian games with strategic complementarities. J Econ Theory 134:339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorneveld M (2000) Best-response potential games. Econ Lett 66(3):289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Raimondo Manca and an anonymous referee for very valuable comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arsen Palestini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palestini, A., Poggio, I. A Bayesian potential game to illustrate heterogeneity in cost/benefit characteristics. Int Rev Econ 62, 23–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0221-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0221-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation