Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of different types of income comparison on subjective well-being in transition countries and developed European countries. The paper relies on the Life in Transition Survey (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2011), which was conducted in late 2010 jointly by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank. The emphasis of the paper is on income comparisons, specifically; local comparisons and self-ranking. The main findings reveal that comparisons have a significant impact on life satisfaction in transition countries, whereas the relationship between comparison and life satisfaction is ambiguous in developed European countries. In transition countries, the impact of comparisons is asymmetric: in most cases, under-performing one’s benchmark has a greater effect than out-performing it. In transition countries, both downward and upward evaluations have an impact on life satisfaction, while it is worthy of note that all upward evaluations have no effect on life satisfaction in developed European countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In economics, the oldest and most developed neo-cardinal methodology leading to a cardinal representation of individual utility is the Leyden approach based on a complicated procedure that involves an infinite number of consumption groups with a cumulative density function of a lognormal distribution. For details see: Van Praag (1968).
Although the term “transition economies” usually covers the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, this term may have a wider context. The categorization of European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) include central Eastern Europe and the Baltic States, south-eastern Europe, Eastern Europe and the Caucasus and Central Asia.
For income comparison effects on life satisfaction for the Turkish case see Dumludag (2013).
Although information related to income was not used in the survey, expenditure may give a much better indication of the material resources available to individuals. According to the Life In Transition Survey (2011), standard of living is measured using a series of questions regarding household expenditure over the past 12 months based on a comprehensive list of several items including food, beverages and tobacco; utilities (electricity, water, gas, heating, fixed-line phone); transportation (public transportation, fuel for car); education (including tuition, books, kindergarten expenses); health (including medicines and health insurance); clothing and footwear; and durable goods (e.g., furniture, household appliances: TV, car, etc).
References
Blanchflower D, Oswald A (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88:1359–1386
Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL (1976) The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Clark AE, Oswald A (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Public Econ 61:359–381
Clark AE, Senik C (2010) Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Econ J 120(544):573–594
Di Tella R, Haisken Denew J, MacCulloch R (2010) Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. J Econ Behav Organ 76:834–852
Duesenberry JS (1949) Income, saving and the theory of consumer behaviors. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Dumludag D (2013) Life satisfaction and income comparison effects in Turkey. Soc Indic Res 114(3):1199–1210
Easterlin R (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? In: David PA, Reder MW (eds) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. Academic Press, New York
Easterlin R (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27(1):35–48
Easterlin RA (2009) Lost in transition: life satisfaction on the road to capitalism. J Econ Behav Organ 71(2):130–145
EBRD (2006) Life in Transition Survey, http://www.ebrd.com/pages/research/publications/special/lifeintransition.shtml
EBRD (2011) Life in Transition Survey II. http://www.ebrd.com/pages/research/publications/special/transitionII.shtml
Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2005) Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J Public Econ 89:997–1019
Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Frijters P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J 114(497):641–659
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7:117–140
Frank RH (1985a) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am Econ Rev 75:101–116
Frank RH (1985b) Choosing the right pond: human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford University Press, New York
Frey B, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit XL:402–435
Frijters P, Haisken-DeNew JP, Shields MA (2004) Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. Am Econ Rev 94(3):730–740
Goerke L, Pannenberg M (2013) Direct evidence on income comparisons and subjective well-being, SOEP papers on multidisciplinary panel data research no. 549
Hirsch F (1976) Social limits to growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies, vol 19. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kapteyn A (1977) A theory of preference formation. Ph.D. thesis, Leyden University
Kapteyn A, Van Praag BMS, Van Herwaarden FG (1978) Individual welfare functions and social reference spaces [0165-1765]. Econ Lett 1(2):173
Layard R (1980) Human satisfactions and public policy. Econ J 90:737–750
Layard R (2005) Happiness. Lessons from a new science. Penguin Books, New York
Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120:963–1002
Marx K (1849) Wage-labour and capital. May 2002. http://eserver.org/marx/1849-wage.labor.capital/6-labor.and.capital.txt
Mayraz G, Wagner GG, Schupp J (2009) Life satisfaction and relative income: perceptions and evidence. In: CEP discussion paper, no. 938. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
McBride M (2001) Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. J Econ Behav Organ 45(3):251–278
Michalos AC (1985) Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Soc Indic Res 16(4):347–413
Namazie C, Sanfey P (2001) Happiness and transition: the case of Kyrgyzstan. Rev Dev Econ 5(3):392–405
Pollak RA (1976) Interdependent preferences. Am Econ Rev 66(3):309–320
Sanfey P, Teksoz U (2007) Does transition make you happy? Econ Transit 15(4):707–731
Schyns P (2000) The relationship between income, changes in income and life-satisfaction in West Germany and the Russian Federation: relative, absolute, or a combination of both? In: Social indicators research series: advances in quality of life theory and research. Springer, Netherlands, pp 83–109
Selezneva E (2011) Surveying transitional experience and subjective well-being: income, work, family. Econ Syst 35(2):139–157
Senik C (2004) When information dominates comparison: learning from Russian subjective panel data. J Public Econ 88(9):2099–2123
Senik C (2008) Ambition and jealousy: income interactions in the ‘Old’Europe versus the ‘New’Europe and the United States. Economica 75(299):495–513
Senik C (2009) Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects. J Econ Behav Organ 72:408–424
Smith A (1937) The wealth of nations. Modern Library, New York
Stutzer A (2004) The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J Econ Behav Organ 54(1):89–109
Van Praag BMS (1968) Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Veblen T (1899) The theory of leisure class. Modern Library, New York
Veenhoven R (1991) Is happiness relative? Soc Indic Res 24:1–34
Veenhoven R (2001) Are the Russians as unhappy as they say they are? J Happiness Stud 2(2):111–136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumludag, D. Satisfaction and comparison income in transition and developed economies. Int Rev Econ 61, 127–152 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0201-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0201-0