Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) held by infertile Japanese patients have not been explored. The objective of the present study was to examine interest levels, preferred destinations, motivations, and sources of information related to CBRC. Our findings provide a general outline of CBRC and the future of reproduction and assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Japan.
The study used a cross-sectional design. Data were collected from 2,007 infertile Japanese patients from 65 accredited ART clinics in Japan (response rate, 27.4 %) via anonymous questionnaires.
Most of the infertile Japanese patients who responded denied using CBRC. However, by group, 171 (8.5 %) patients in non-donor in vitro fertilization, 150 (7.5 %) in egg donation, 145 (7.2 %) in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, and 129 (6.4 %) in surrogacy said that, depending on the situation, they might travel abroad in the future. Older respondents were more likely to express an intention to travel overseas for egg donation in the future. The most popular destination for CBRC was the United States. Popular reasons for interest in CBRC among those considering or planning using this approach to third-party reproduction were that egg donation or surrogacy was unavailable or that obtaining ethical approval takes too long in Japan, whereas these processes are legal and affordable overseas. However, high cost was the most common reason for hesitancy regarding CBRC. Among the participants who were considering or planning to travel abroad for this purpose, TV, medical agencies, print media, and message boards on websites were popular sources of information, whereas doctors, friends, and patient self-help groups were not.
Although CBRC among infertile Japanese patients is not at present common, the demand for and use of this approach may increase in the future in the context of the increasingly aging population. Lack of regulation and unavailability of third-party reproduction is a major cause of CBRC among Japanese patients. Health care provider faces an urgent need for giving useful information for patients regarding CBRC.
- Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG). Report on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in 2009. http://www.jsog.or.jp/activity/pdf/Rinri_report6309.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JMHLW). Report on Japanese attitudes on assisted reproductive technology 2002. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/wp/kenkyu/db/tokubetu02/index.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG). Guidelines on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. October 1998, revised 2006 and 2010. The latest version is available from: http://www.jsog.or.jp/ethic/chakushouzen_20110226.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG). Guidelines on embryo donation for reproductive purposes 2004. http://www.jsog.or.jp/about_us/view/html/kaikoku/H16_4.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG). Guidelines on surrogacy 2003. http://www.jsog.or.jp/about_us/view/html/kaikoku/H15_4.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile”. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:904–6. CrossRef
- Mattorras R. Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3571. CrossRef
- Pennings G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2689–94. CrossRef
- Ferraretti AP, Pennings G, Gianaroli L, Natali F, Magil MC. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:261–6. CrossRef
- Inhorn MC, Shrivastav P. Globalization and reproductive tourism in the United Arab Emirates. Asia-Pac J Public Health. 2010;22:68S–84S. CrossRef
- Pennings G, Mertes H. The state and the infertile patient looking for treatment abroad: a difficult relationship. In: Tupasela A, editor. Consumer medicine. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2010. p. 93–110.
- Shenfield F, Mouzon J, Pennings G, et al. Cross-border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(6):1361–8. CrossRef
- Nygren K, Adamson GD, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mouzon J. Cross-border fertility care—international committee monitoring assisted reproductive technologies global survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):e4–10. CrossRef
- Cully L, Hudson N, Rapport F, Blyth E, Norton W, Pacey AA. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2373–81. CrossRef
- Hughes E, Dejean D. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:e16–9. CrossRef
- McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, Jauniaux ER. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity services. BJOG. 2009;116(11):1520–3. CrossRef
- Pennings G, Autin C, Decleer W, Delbaere A, Delbeke L, Delvigne A, et al. Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3108–18. CrossRef
- Hudson N, Culley L, Blyth E, Norton W, Rapport F, Pacey A. Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:673–85. CrossRef
- Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JMHLW). A summary of the 2011 current population survey report. September 2012. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai11/. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
- Whittaker A. Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(37):107–16. CrossRef
- Whittaker A, Speier A. “Cycling overseas”: care, commodification, and stratification in cross-border reproductive travel. Med Anthropol. 2010;29(4):363–83. CrossRef
- Blyth E. Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:e11–5. CrossRef
- Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 6 , pp 477-484
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Japan
- Additional Links
- Cross-border reproductive care
- Assisted reproductive technology
- Third-party reproduction
- Infertile Japanese patients