Abstract
In this paper, a new methodical framework that combines elements of event studies and copula methodology is proposed in the context of the analysis of bank contagion. Furthermore, to the best knowledge of the author, this paper is the first one to analyse changes in the dependence structure of banks around bailout announcements. The results of the empirical study show that significant contagion effects could be detected both in the German banking sector after the onset of the subprime crisis as well as in the Japanese banking sector in the mid-nineties. I find that announcements of crisis at struggling banks induce a significant increase of lower tail dependence in the banking sector. The analysed bailouts and rescue measures by the central bank proved to be effective in reducing this increased lower tail dependence while increasing tail independence of bank stock returns at the same time. In both data samples, I find that the bailout announcements did not simply restore the pre-crisis dependence structure, but rather only decreased the likelihood of a joint crash of bank stocks without increasing the chances of a joint boom.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharony J, Swary I (1983) Contagion effects of bank failures: evidence from capital markets. J Bus 56:305–322
Akhigbe A, Madura J (2001) Why do contagion effects vary among bank failures? J Bank Financ 25:657–680
Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108:1–33
Bagehot W (1873) Lombard street: a description of the money market. H.S. King, London
Bartram S, Taylor S, Wang YH (2007) The Euro and European financial market dependence. J Bank Financ 31:1461–1481
Bhattacharya S, Thakor A (1993) Contemporary banking theory. J Financ Intermed 3:2–50
Bessler W, Nohel T (2000) Asymmetric information, dividend reductions, and contagion effects in bank stock returns. J Bank Financ 24:1831–1848
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 31:307–327
Bollerslev T, Chou R, Kroner K (1992) ARCH modeling in finance. J Econom 52:5–59
Bouyé E (2003) Multivariate extremes at work for portfolio risk measurement. Working paper, City University Business School, London
Butkiewicz J (1995) The impact of a lender of last resort during the great depression: the case of the reconstruction finance corporation. Explor Econ Hist 32(2):197–216
Calomiris C, Mason J (1997) Contagion and bank failures during the great depression: the June 1932 Chicago banking panic. Am Econ Rev 87:863–883
Chen S, Huang T (2007) Nonparametric estimation of copula functions for dependence modeling. Can J Stat 35:265–282
Chen S, Poon S (2007) Modelling international stock market contagion using copula and risk appetite. Working paper
De Bandt O, Hartmann P (2001) Systemic risk: a survey. In: Goodhart C, Illing G (eds) Financial crisis, contagion and the lender of last resort: a book of readings, London, pp 249–298
Demarta S, McNeil A (2005) The t copula and related copulas. Intern Stat Rev 73(1):111–129
Diamond D (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev Econ Stud 54:393–414
Diamond D (1991) Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. J Polit Econ 99:689–721
Dias A, Embrechts P (2009) Testing for structural changes in exchange rates dependence beyond linear correlation. Eur J Financ. doi:10.1080/13518470701705579
Fee E, Thomas S (2004) Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. J Financ Econ 74(3):423–460
Fermanian JD (2005) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas. J Multivar Anal 95(1):119–152
Forbes K, Rigobon R (2002) No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market co-movements. J Finance 52(5):2223–2261
Foster G (1980) Accounting policy decisions and capital market research. J Account Econ 2(1):29–62
Freixas X, Parigi B, Rochet J (1998) The lender of last resort: a theoretical foundation. Mimeo, University of Toulouse
Genest C (1987) Frank’s family of bivariate distributions. Biom 74:549–555
Genest C, Mackay RJ (1986) Copules arquimédiennes et familles des lois bidimensionelles dont les marges sont données. Can J Stat 14:145–159
Genest C, Ghoudi K, Rivest L (1995) A semiparametric estimation procedure of dependence parameters in multivariate families of distributions. Biom 82:543–552
Genest C, Rémillard B, Beaudoin D (2008) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insur Math Econ 44:199–213
Goodhart G, Huang H (2005) The lender of last resort. J Bank Financ 29(5):1059–1082
Gorton G (1985) Bank suspension of convertibility. J Monet Econ 15:177–193
Gorton G, Huang L (2006) Bank panics and the endogeneity of central banking. J Monet Econ 53(7):1613–1629
Gropp R, Moerman G (2004) Measurement of contagion in banks’ equity prices. J Int Money Financ 23(3):405–459
Gropp R, Vesala J (2004) Measuring bank contagion using market data. In: The evolving financial system and public policy, Bank of Canada
Hasman A, Samartín M (2008) Information acquisition and financial contagion. J Bank Financ 32:2136–2147. doi:10.1016/j.bankfin.2007.12.033
Hutchinson T, Lai C (1990) Continuous multivariate distributions. Emphasising applications. Rumsby Scientific Publishing, Adelaide
Hoeffding W (1940) Scale invariant correlation theory. Schr Math Inst Univ Berl 5:181–233
James C (1991) The losses realized in bank failures. J Finance 46:1223–1242
Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman & Hall, London
Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2006) The Copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: an international stock market application. J Int Money Financ 25(5):827–853
Kabir M, Hassan M (2005) The near-collapse of LTCM, US financial stock returns and the fed. J Bank Financ 29:441–460
Kaufman G (1994) Bank contagion: a review of the theory and evidence. J Financ Serv Res 8:123–150
Kim G, Silvapulle M, Silvapulle P (2007) Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulas. Comput Stat & Data Anal 51:2836–2850
Kole E, Koedijk K, Verbeek M (2007) Selecting copulas for risk management. J Bank Financ 31(8):2405–2423
Lau S, McInish T (2003) IMF bailouts, contagion effects, and bank security returns. J Int Rev Fin Anal 12:3–23
Lerrick A, Meltzer A (2003) Blueprint for an international lender of last resort. J Monet Econ 50:289–303
McNeil A, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management. Princeton University Press, Princeton
McWilliams T, McWilliams V (2000) Another look at theoretical and empirical issues of event study methodology. J Appl Bus 11:195–210
Miyajima H, Yafeh Y (2007) Japan’s banking crisis: an event-study perspective. J Bank Financ 31:2866–2885
Nelsen R (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Patton A (2002a) Applications of copula theory in financial econometrics. Ph.D. dissertation University of California, San Diego
Patton A (2002b) Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. Int Econ Rev 47(2):527–556
Resnick SI (1987) Extreme values, regular variation, and point processes. Springer, Berlin
Rodriguez J (2007) Measuring financial contagion: a copula approach. J Empir Finance 14:401–423
Schmid F, Schmidt R (2007) Multivariate conditional versions of Spearman’s rho and related measures of tail dependence. J Multivar Anal 98:1123–1140
Sibuya M (1960) Bivariate extreme statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 11:195–210
Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de repartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Univ Paris 8:229–231
Yorulmazer T (2008) Liquidity, bank runs and bailouts: spillover effects during the northern rock episode. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Acknowledgements
I thank Tobias Michalak, Stephan Paul, André Uhde as well as participants of the Campus for Finance Conference 2009 in Vallendar and the EFM Symposium on Risk Management in Financial Institutions in Nantes for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiß, G.N.F. Analysing contagion and bailout effects with copulae. J Econ Finan 36, 1–32 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-009-9099-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-009-9099-x