Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Child Material Deprivation Index

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Child poverty is high on the policy agenda in the UK and the European Union. But poverty and deprivation is almost exclusively measured by asking adults (parents) about their incomes and living standards. Some qualitative work has been done asking children about poverty but this article develops a new, child-centric measure using children as informants. Data from two surveys run by the Children’s Society are used, both covering children aged 8–16. One included 2,000 respondents and data were linked to income data provided by parents; the other included almost 5,500 respondents and covered detailed topics relating to children’s material situation and their subjective well-being. A new ten item deprivation index was developed and children were asked whether they lacked the items, and if so whether they wanted them or not. It was found that this index explained more of the variation in subjective well-being than parental income poverty explained. This is partly because there were deprived children living in families which were not income poor and non deprived children living in families which were income poor. Child material deprivation was found to be more strongly related to low subjective well-being than the absence of deprivation was to high subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Though there are only a very small number of children in this category (7). However, the pattern of the results lends some credibility to the results despite the small numbers.

References

  • Adams, N., Barton, A., Johnson, G. A., & Matejic, P. (2011). Households below average income. London: DWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, P. (2006). Poverty. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attree, P. (2006). The social costs of child poverty. Children and Society, 20, 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastos, A., Casaca, S. F., Nunes, F., & Pereirinha, J. (2009). Women and poverty. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 764–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2000). Beyond welfare. Social Indicators Research, 52(3), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement. Child Indicators Research, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgers, N., de Leeuw, E., and Hox, J. (2000). Children as respondents in survey research. Accessed online from http://www.epicentro.iss.it/okkioallasalute/documenti/letteratura_scientifica/Borghers_questionnaires%20children.pdf on 26/4/12.

  • Bradshaw, J. (2011). The well-being of children in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2003). Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 32(4), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., & Mayhew, E. (2010). Understanding extreme poverty in the European Union. European Journal of Homelessness, 4, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Holmes, H., & Hallerod, B. (1995). ‘Adapting the consensual definition of poverty’. In D. Gordon & C. Pantazis (Eds.), Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Ashgate: Aldershot.

  • Bradshaw, J., Finch, N., Kemp, P. A., Mayhew, E., & Williams, J. (2003). Gender and poverty in Britain. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Hoscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 133–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, F. (2010). The foundation years. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1985). Erring on the side of kindness in social welfare policy. Policy Sciences, 18, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Pantazis, C. (1997). Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Guio, A.-C. (2009). What can be learned from deprivation indicators in Europe? Paper presented at the Indicators Sub-Group of the Social Protection Committee, Eurostat Methodological Working Papers

  • Hallerod, B. (2006). Sour grapes. Journal of Social Policy, 35(3), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. S., & Jenkins, S. P. (2001). Poverty among British children. In B. Bradbury, S. P. Jenkins, & J. Micklewright (Eds.), The dynamics of child poverty in industrialised countries. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. P., Schluter, C., & Wagner, G. G. (2000). The dynamics of child poverty. Berlin: Deutsches Institut for Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. W., & Choi, Y. J. (2010) Feminisation of poverty in 12 welfare states. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series: number 549.

  • Knies, G. (2011). Life satisfaction and material well-being of young people in the UK. In S. L. McFall & C. Garrington (Eds.), Early findings from the first wave of the UK’s household longitudinal study. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Campbell, M. (2007). UK work/family balance policies and gender equality, 1997–2005. Social Politics, 14(1), 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2005). Women’s and children’s poverty. London: Women’s Budget Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2006). Children (but not women) first. Critical Social Policy, 26(2), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor Britain. London: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S., and Collard, S. (2003) Developing deprivation questions for the family resources survey. Working paper number 13. Bristol: Personal Finance Research Centre.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries? Paris: OECD. Chapter 6.

  • Pahl, J. (1989). Money and marriage. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Piachaud, D., & Sutherland, H. (2000). How effective is the British government’s attempt to reduce child poverty? C ASE paper 38. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G., Goswami, H., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Developing an index of children’s subjective well-being in England. London: The Children’s Society.

  • Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Children as respondents. In P. M. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi J. P. (2008), Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, http://www.stiglitz-senfitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

  • The Children’s Society (2012) The good childhood report 2012: a review of our children’s well-being,

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Children’s Society who funded the surveys used in this article and specifically to Gwyther Rees, Larissa Pople, Haridhan Goswami and Antonia Keung for feedback on various stages of this research. Many thanks also to two anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gill Main.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Main, G., Bradshaw, J. A Child Material Deprivation Index. Child Ind Res 5, 503–521 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9145-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9145-7

Keywords

Navigation