Abstract
Early international comparisons of child well-being have tended to use relative child income poverty rates. There are reasons to doubt the reliability of the relative child income poverty rate especially in comparative analysis. This chapter therefore explores the relationship between the relative income child poverty rate and the multi-dimensional index of child well-being developed in the UNICEF Innocenti Report Card 11. It finds that the material domain which includes the relative child income poverty rates is associated with all the other five domains of child well-being and also with overall well-being even when the material domain is excluded. Two indicators of child deprivation in the material domain are most closely associated with overall well-being. But the third most closely associated indicator is the relative child poverty rate. This is a remarkable finding given that the child income poverty rate is a relative indicator with very different levels in different countries. It suggests that child well-being may itself be driven partly or mainly by relativities in a society rather than absolute and objective conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the EU the at-risk-of-poverty threshold fell between 2008 and 2012 in Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain and the UK (see Figure 12 2013 EU Social Protection Committee’s report on the social situation in the EU (“Social Europe: many ways, one objective”) http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=7695&type=2&furtherPubs=yes
- 2.
The Gini coefficients for the EU countries were taken from the Eurostat database for 2012 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. For the non EU countries they were OECD data for the late 2000s.
- 3.
Derived from the Eurostat data base (Canada, Australia and New Zealand not included in Model 2).
References
Bradshaw, J., & Mayhew, E. (2011). The measurement of extreme poverty in the European Union. European Commission DG Employment Social Affairs and Inclusion. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=756&langId=en
Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2008). Does child income poverty measure child well-being internationally? Social Policy and Society, 7(4), 521–536.
Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319.
Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union 25. Journal of Social Indicators Research, 80, 133–177.
Bradshaw, J. B., Martorano, L. N., & de Neubourg, C. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being in rich countries. Child Indicators Research, 6(4), 619–635.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2012). Measuring child poverty: A consultation on better measures of child poverty. London: DWP.
Griggs, J., & Walker, R. (2008). The costs of child poverty for individuals and society: A literature review. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/2301-child-poverty-costs.pdf
Guio, A. C., Gordon, D., & Marlier, E. (2012). Measuring material deprivation in the EU: Indicators for the whole population and child-specific indicators (Methodologies working papers). Luxembourg: European Union.
Hirsch, D. (2008). Estimating the costs of child poverty. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/2313.pdf. Updated 2013 here http://www.cpag.org.uk/sites/default/files/Cost%20of%20child%20poverty%20research%20update%20(2013).pdf
Klocke, A., Clair, A., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). International variation in child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 7(1), 1–20.
Main, G., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). A child material deprivation index. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 503–521.
Martorano, B., Natali, L., de Neubourg, C., & Bradshaw, J. (2013). Child well-being in advanced economies in the late 2000s. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 247–283.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Doing better for children. Paris: OECD.
Richardson, D., Hoelscher, P., & Bradshaw, J. (2008). Child well-being in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Child Indicator Research, 1, 211–250.
TARKI. (2010). Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union. Report prepared for the DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (Unite E.2) of the European Commission, Budapest.
UNICEF. (2000). A league table of child poverty in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card 1). Florence: UNICEF.
UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card 7). Florence: UNICEF.
UNICEF. (2010). Measuring child poverty: New league tables of child poverty in the world’s rich countries (Innocenti Report Card 10). Florence: UNICEF.
UNICEF Office of Research. (2013). Measuring child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview (Innocenti Report Card 11). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bradshaw, J. (2015). Child Poverty and Child Well-Being in International Perspective. In: Fernandez, E., Zeira, A., Vecchiato, T., Canali, C. (eds) Theoretical and Empirical Insights into Child and Family Poverty. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17505-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17506-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)