Abstract
This paper presents an empirical study on procedural learning from errors that was conducted within the field of vocational education. It examines whether, and to what extent, procedural learning can benefit more from the detection and written analysis of errors (experimental condition) than from the correct elements (control group). The study involved 136 commercial employee apprentices who were working on a videorecorded, worked-out example of a professional procedure involving customer counselling. The results showed no differences between the conditions with regards to declarative knowledge acquisition during the procedure. Additionally, the analysis of errors was demonstrated to be more effective than the analysis of correct behaviours in terms of (1) representing a much more detailed and correct procedure and (2) developing anticipatory knowledge about possible errors to be avoided. The results highlighted the value of the inductive instructional strategy (from the analysis of a single worked-out example to the learning of the general procedure) and opened the field up for future applications of a similar instructional approach combining roleplaying and video analysis of errors in vocational education to develop communication skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A., & Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modelling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42(1), 7–49.
Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354–359.
Baartman, L. K. J., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 125–134.
Baird, L., Holland, P., & Deacon, S. (1999). Learning from action: imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 19–32.
Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2007). Workplace changesand workplace learning: advantages of an educational micro perspective. International Jorunal of Lifelong Learning, 26(6), 675–688.
Bauer, J., & Harteis, C. (Eds.) (2012). Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2007). Modelling learning from errors in daily work. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6(3), 121–133.
Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2008). Conceptualisation of learning through errors at work - a literature review. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 115–128). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bauer, J., Gartmeier, M., & Harteis, C. (2012). Human fallibility and learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 155–169). Dordrecht: Springer.
Baumgartner, A., & Seifried, J. (2012). Professional handling of errors in the workplace. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 127–141). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berkhof, M., van Rijssen, H. J., Schellart, A. J. M., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 152–162.
Billett, S. (2012). Errors and learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 17–32). Dordrecht: Springer.
Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2012). Collaborative writing on professional experiences as a means for fostering reflective thinking in VET curricula. In C. Gelati, B. Arfé, & L. Mason (Eds.), Issues in writing research (pp. 180–188). Padova: Cleup.
Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Written identification of errors to learn professional procedures in VET. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 525–542.
Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34.
Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 83–104). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to Fail (intelligently): how great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 38(3), 299–319.
Cattaneo, A., & Boldrini, E. (2016). Individual and collaborative writing-to-learn activities in vocational education: an overview of different instructional strategies. In G. Ortoleva, M. Bétrancourt, & S. Billett (Eds.), Writing for professional development (pp. 188–208). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Cattaneo, A., Nguyen, A. T., & Aprea, C. (2016). Teaching and learning with Hypervideo in vocational education and training. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25(1), 5–35.
Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66–88.
Curry, L. A. (2004). The Effects of Self-Explanations of Correct and Incorrect Solutions on Algebra Problem-Solving Performance. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Mahwah, NJ (pp. 1548): Erlbaum
Daetwyler, C. J., Cohen, D. G., Gracely, E., & Novack, D. H. (2010). eLearning to enhance physician patient communication: a pilot test of “doc.Com” and “WebEncounter” in teaching bad news delivery. Medical Teacher, 32, e381–e390.
Dalehefte, I. M., Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2012). Reflecting on learning from errors in school instruction: findings and suggestions from a Swiss-German video study. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 197–213). Dordrecht: Springer.
Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.
Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43(4), 433–453.
Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 206–214.
Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 2), ii3–ii9.
Ellis, S. (2012). Learning from errors: the role of after-event reviews. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 215–232). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857–871.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, 2 ed., pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gartmeier, M., & Schüttelkopf, E. M. (2012). Tracing outcomes of learning from errors on the level of knowledge. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 33–51). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010). Workp!Ace errors and negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 5–25.
Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., et al. (2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9341-6.
Gavota, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Schneider, D. K. (2010a). Writing and commenting on professional procedures. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) – Volume 1, Full Papers Chicago IL (pp. 683–689). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Gavota, M., Cattaneo, A., Arn, C., Boldrini, E., Motta, E., Schneider, D. K., et al. (2010b). Computer-supported peer commenting: a promising instructional method to promote skill development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(4), 495–511.
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 612–634.
Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.
Harteis, C., & Buschmeyer, K. (2012). Learning from mistakes - still a challenge for research and business practice. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 31–47). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.
Hausmann, R. G. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2002). Can a computer Interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology, 7(1), 4–14.
Hausmann, R. G. M., & Van Lehn, K. (2010). The effect of self-explaining on robust learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(4), 303–332.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Heimbeck, D., Frese, M., Sonnentag, S., & Keith, N. (2003). Integrating errors into the training process: the function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 333–361.
Heinze, A., Ufer, S., Rach, S., & Reiss, K. (2012). The student perspective on dealing with errors in mathematics class. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 65–79). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.
Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 18–29.
Illeris, K. (2011). The fundamentals of workplace learning. Understanding how people learn in working life. New York: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory Vol.II (pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonasson, C. (2015). Interactional processes of handling errors in vocational schools: students attending to changes in vocational practices. Vocations and Learning, 8(1), 75–93.
Kember, D. (2001). Reflective teaching and learning in the health profession. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Klein, P. D., Boscolo, P., Kirckpatrick, L. C., & Gelati, C. (Eds.) (2014). Writing as a Learning Activity (studies in writing). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Leicher, V., Mulder, R. H., & Bauer, J. (2013). Learning from errors at work: a replication study in elder care nursing. Vocations and Learning, 6(2), 207–220.
Lukinsky, J. (1990). Reflective withdrawal through journal writing. In J. Mezirow, & Associates (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 213–234). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: the role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704.
Minnameier, G. (2012). What's wrong with it? - kinds and inferential mechanics of errors and mistakes. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 13–29). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
Mu, X. (2010). Towards effective video annotation: an approach to automatically link notes with video content. Computers & Education, 55, 1752–1763.
Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: the effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 173–199.
Nückles, M. (2015). Writing as a learning activity [review of the book Writing as a Learning Activity (studies in writing series) by Klein, P.D., Boscolo, P. Kirckpatrick, L. C., & Gelati, C. (Eds.)]. Journal of Writing Research, 6(3), 318–323.
Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2), 241–262.
Oser, F. (2007). Aus Fehler lernen. In M. Göhlich, C. Wulf, & J. Zirfas (Eds.), Pädagogische Theorien des lernen (pp. 203–212). Weinheim-Basel: Betz.
Oser, F., & Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft. Zur Theorie des negativen Wissens und zur praxis der Fehlerkultur. Weinheim: Beltz.
Rasmussen, J. (1987). The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 23–30). New York: Wiley.
Rausch, A. (2012). Errors, emotions, and learning in the workplace - findings from a diary study within VET. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 111–126). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, J. (1995). Understanding adverse events: human factors. Quality in Health Care, 4, 80–89.
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.
Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.
Rich, P., & Trip, T. (2011). Ten essential questions educators should ask when using video annotation tools. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 55(6), 16–24.
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: the effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15.
Rosenheck, M., Kohlhaas, P., Bastian, D., & Schlegel, C. (2007). Projekt Zukunft der beruflichen Grundbildung im kaufmännischen Berufsfeld. Bericht zur Szenarioanalyse [Project 'The future of initial vocational education in the commercial field'. Report on the scenarios analysis]. Winterthur: Zürcher Hochschule Winterthur - Zentrum Human Capital Management ZHCM.
Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: structures and processes. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 245–263). Mahaw, NJ - London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schumacher, G. M., & Gradwohl Nash, J. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 67–96.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: when instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46(4), 426–445.
State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI (2014). Piano di formazione – Impiegato/a di commercio AFC [learning plan – commercial employee]. Bern: Conferenza svizzera dei rami commerciali di formazione e d’esame (CSFRC). Available at: http://www.skkab.ch/download/pictures/44/ea1261543h63h3bmgnovd31h1dpgho/bildungsplan_sog_erlass_i_2014_11_21.pdf.
Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment. Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., & Ramchandran, A. (2007). Reflections on a post-Gutenberg epistemology for video use in ill-structured domains: fostering complex learning and cognitive flexibility. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 93–100). Mahwahm NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 137(3), 548–565.
Tiellet, C. A. B., Pereira, A. G., Reategui, E. B., Lima, J. V., & Chambel, T. Design and Evaluation of a Hypervideo Environment to Support Veterinary Surgery Learning. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010 (pp. 213–222): ACM
Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739.
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154.
Van Lehn, K. (1999). Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: an evaluation of CASCADE. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 71–125.
Van Merriënboer, J. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Ten Steps to Complex Learning. A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design. New York: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.
Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (Eds.) (2012). Learning from errors at school and at work. Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 403–440.
Acknowledgments
The study presented here is part of a series of activities of the Swiss “Technologies for Vocational Training” Leading House funded by the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) within the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER) [BB.2009.0175]. We would thank Claudia Sassi, Marco Ricci and all the trainers at the Società Impiegati di Commercio (SIC Ticino) whose support was fundamental for this experience; and Carlo Tomasetto for his precious contributions and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cattaneo, A.A.P., Boldrini, E. You Learn by your Mistakes. Effective Training Strategies Based on the Analysis of Video-Recorded Worked-out Examples. Vocations and Learning 10, 1–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9157-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9157-4