Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professional Practice as Processes of Muddling Through: a Study of Learning and Sense Making in Social Work

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 November 2014

Abstract

Using an ethnographic approach, the aim of this study was to explore how social workers learn and make sense of experiences in their daily practices. Five events that took place during an ordinary day of child investigation work are described and serve as the basis for the analysis. The findings imply that investigation work is largely a social rationalization process and that the interaction between different actors in work is a strategy to enhance the level of knowledge and contribute to learning among the professionals. Thus, learning is embedded in daily activities, for example, consulting colleagues, framing problems and building relationships. Furthermore, the findings suggest the possibility of assuming a contextualized view of reasoning, a so-called contextual rationality, which maintains that practitioners need to make judgments in a way that is sensitive to and relevant for their own contextualized settings. Contextual rationality is a reasonable strategy to deal with complex problems in daily practices that cannot be completely analysed or solved. Contextual rationality is thus not about accuracy; rather, it engages individuals to find meaning and order in the complexity of modern organizations where norms, values and expectations provide frameworks for explanations. Besides offering an explanation for the basis of practice, the study identifies a variety of learning opportunities in everyday practice that could potentially be used in efforts to organize a more reflective practice to facilitate improved workplace learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. H. (1996). The professional stranger (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avby, G., Nilsen, P., & Abrandt Dalgren, M. (2013). Ways of understanding evidence-based practice in social work: a qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1366–1383. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-2-00214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: a relational interdependence between personal and social agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 39–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00394.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colville, I., Hennestad, B., & Thoner, K. (2014). Organizing, changing and learning: a sense making perspective on an ongoing ‘soap story’. Management Learning, 45(2), 216–234. doi:10.1177/1350507612473710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2003). Social learning theory: learning as participation in social processes. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 38–53). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2006). The meaning and role of reflection in informal learning at work. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 43–53). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136. doi:10.1348/000709900158001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1984). Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 23–31. doi:10.2307/975658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: an alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, L., & Gambrill, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice: counterarguments to objections. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 452–476. doi:10.1177/1049731502012003007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselblad, H., Bejerot, E., & Gustafsson, R. Å. (2008). Bortom New Public Management: institutionell transformation i svensk sjukvård [Beyond the new public management: institutional transformation in Swedish healthcare]. Lund: Academia Adacta (in Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. (2009). Case of mistaken identity: the social welfare professions and new public management. Journal of Sociology, 45, 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526. doi:10.2307/976178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, A.-L. (2012). Från Krisande Organisationer till “Krisorganisationer” - Kvalité i Socialt Barnavårdsarbete genom Ökad Personalstabilitet [From troubled organizations to “crisis organizations”—quality in child care social work through increased staff stability]. Uppsala: Stiftelsen Allmänna Barnhuset (in Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy (revisedth ed.). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. doi:10.2307/3003600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S. G., & Marsh, J. C. (2008). Practitioner expertise in evidence-based practice decision making. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 301–310. doi:10.1177/1049731507308143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: final report—a child-centred system. London: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, P., Nordström, G., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Integrating research-based and practice-based knowledge through workplace reflection. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(6), 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 371–394. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlander, L. (2006). Mellan kunskap och handling - Om socialsekreterares kunskapsanvändning i utredningsarbetet [Between knowledge and action—if a social worker knowledge use in investigations]. Doctoral thesis: Umeå University, Umeå (in Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, H.-U., Polutta, A., & Ziegler, H. (2009). Evidence-based practice—modernising the knowledge base of social work? Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A., & Barnes, C. (2003). Types and quality of knowledge in social care. Knowledge review 3. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1905). What pragmatism is. The Monist, 15(2), 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson, B., Hyvönen, U., Nygren, L., & Khoo, E. (2010). Child-centered social work practice—three unique meanings in the context of looking after children and the assessment framework in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 452–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner—how professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, M. (1995). Social work, social science and practice wisdom. British Journal of Social Work, 25(3), 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, M., & Ryan, K. (2003). Practitioners as rule using analysts: a further development of process knowledge in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 33(2), 157–176. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.2.157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socialtjänstlag (2001). [Social Services Act]. Stockholm.

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. G. (2010). Professions, organizations, collegiality and accountability. In L. G. Svensson & J. Evetts (Eds.), Sociology of professions, continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions. Daidalos: Borås.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengvald, K. (2008). Evidensbaserad praktik i socialt arbete [Evidence-based practice in social work]. Stockholm: Gothia/IMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (2003). Return to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1212–1237. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Luitgaarden, G. M. J. (2009). Evidence-based practice in social work: lessons from judgment and decision-making theory. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 234–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87(8), 399–419. doi:10.2307/2026735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 57–79. doi:10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sense making in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Westley, F. (1996). Organizational learning: affirming an oxymoron. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 440–458). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1997). Beyond retroduction?—hermeneutics, reflexivity and social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 27(5), 739–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2009). Fabled uncertainty in social work. A coda to Spafford et al. Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Professor Stephen Billett for valuable discussions at an early stage of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden

    Gunilla Avby

Authors
  1. Gunilla Avby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunilla Avby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avby, G. Professional Practice as Processes of Muddling Through: a Study of Learning and Sense Making in Social Work. Vocations and Learning 8, 95–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9123-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9123-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation