Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Biochar on Yield, Nutrient Recovery, and Soil Properties in a Canola (Brassica napus L)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) Rotation Grown under Controlled Environmental Conditions

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochar applications have proven effective in highly weathered tropical and subtropical soils. However, less is known about how different biochars behave as amendments when added to temperate soils. Previously, studies have used high biochar rates (tens to hundred t ha-1) but such high rates are impractical for farm application because of its low density and powdery nature. Therefore, a study was conducted to evaluate the response of canola and wheat grown in rotation to biochars at three different rates (0, 1, and 2 t ha−1) added to a Brown and Black Chernozem soil from Saskatchewan, Canada, in a controlled environment experiment. Five different biochars were obtained from three feedstock sources and added at 0, 1, and 2 t ha-1 with, and without, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer at 50 or 100 kg N ha-1 and 25 kg P2O5 ha-1. Application of fast pyrolysis wheat straw fine fraction and willow fine fraction biochars resulted in significant increases in canola biomass yield when added to the Black Chernozem soil, while the other biochar types had no effect. No significant responses to application of any of the biochars were observed on the Brown Chernozem. For the wheat crop, only flax straw fine biochar added at 1 t ha-1 had a significant residual effect on yield. Biochar did not alter the availability of N and P, and its effects on soil pH, organic carbon, and electrical conductivity were minor. We suggest that biochar applications at 1-2 t ha-1 to prairie Chernozems will not have large effects on plant growth or soil properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agee JK (1996) Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 505

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alotaibi KD, Schoenau J (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient supply rates in soil amended with biofuel production by-products. Biol Fertil Soils 49:129–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brady NC, Weill RR (2004) Elements of the nature and properties of soils. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 111–112

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brewer CE, Hu Y-Y, Schmidt-Rohr K, Loynachan TE, Laird DA, Brown RC (2012) Extent of pyrolysis impacts on fast pyrolysis biochar properties. J Environ Qual 41:1115–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: Nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46(5):437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45(8):629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Devonald VG (1982) The effect of wood charcoal on the growth and nodulation of garden peas in pot culture. Plant Soil 66:125–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding Y, Liu Y, Wu W, Shi D, Yang M, Zhong Z (2010) Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 213:47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher RF, Binkley D (2000) Ecology and management of forest soils. Wiley, New York, p 489

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gajić A, Koch H-J (2012) Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth reduction caused by hydrochar is related to nitrogen supply. J Environ Qual 41:1067–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agron J 102:623–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fert Soils 35(4):219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Houba VJG, Temminghoff EJM, Gaikhorst GA, van Vark W, 9 and 10 (2000) Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1299–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J, Foidl N, Smernik RJ, Amonette JE (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Aust J Soil Res 48:501–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kammann C, Ratering S, Eckhard C, Muller C (2012) Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane) fluxes from soils. J Environ Qual 41:1052–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimetu J, Lehmann J, Ngoze S, Mugendi D, Kinyangi J, Riha S, Verchot L, Recha J, Pell A (2008) Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kloss S, Zehetner F, Wimmer B, Buecker J, Rempt F, Soja G (2013) Biochar application to temperate soils: effects on soil fertility and crop growth under greenhouse conditions. J Plant Nutr and Soil Sci 000:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehmann J, Rondon M (2006) Bio char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. In: Uphoff N, Ball NA, Fernandes E, Herren H, Husson O, Laing M, Palm C, Pretty J, Sanchez P, Sanginga N, Thies J (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC, Baca Raton, FL, pp 517–530

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11:403–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann J, da Silva Jr JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41(4):1033–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Petersen J, Neves EJ (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(5):1719–1730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha S, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333:117–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mann CC (2008) Ancient earthmovers of the Amazon. Science 321:1148–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McCauley A, Jones C, Jacobsen J (2009) Soil pH and organic matter. In: Nutrient Management Module No.8, 1-12. Montana State University Extension, pp 1-12

  34. McElligott KM, Page-Dumroese DS, Coleman M (2011) Bioenergy production systems and biochar application in forests: potential for renewable energy, soil enhancement, and carbon sequestration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USA, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mooleki P, Schoenau JJ, Wen G, Charles JL (2004) Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 84:199–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 539–579

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qian P, Schoenau JJ, Karamanos RE (1994) Simultaneous extraction of available phosphorus and potassium with a new soil test—a modification of Kelowna extraction. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:627–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schnell RW, Vietor DM, Provin TL, Munster CL, Capareda S (2012) Capacity of biochar application to maintain energy crop productivity: soil chemistry, sorghum growth, and runoff water quality effects. J Environ Qual 1:1044–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sinclair K., Slavich P, Morris S, Kimber S, Downie A, Van Zwieten L. 2010. Influence of biochar on soil fertility, carbon storage and biomass in subtropical pasture: results from a 3 year field study. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Biochar Conference,. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 169-170

  40. Sohi S, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Soil Classification Working Group (1998) The Canadian System of Soil Classification, 3rd edn. NRC Research Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DM, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stefankiw JJ (2012) Novel organic amendments to improve soil fertility and plant nutrition. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

  44. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR (1967) Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 59:240–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tyron EH (1948) Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecol Monogr 18:82–115

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Chan KY, Cowie A, Wainberg A, Morris S (2007) Papermill char: benefits to soil health and plant production. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the International Agrichar Initiative, Terrigal, NSW, Australia

  48. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Morris S, Rust J, Chan KY (2010) A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Aust J Soil Res 48:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang D, Anderson DW (1998) Direct measurement of organic carbon content in soils by the Leco CR-12 carbon analyzer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Commun 1:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr 52:489–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan J-H, Xu R-K (2011) The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Manag 27:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn MY (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1169–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Saskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund (ADF) for financial support of the research project was acknowledged. Sincere appreciation is extended to Dr. Miguel Providenti for his guidance on biochar sourcing and production, and to Saskatchewan Research Council and Prairie Biochar Inc. for supplying the biochars used in this research project.

Conflict of Interest

Authors (Hasan Pervej Ahmed and Jeff Schoenau) of this manuscript have confirmed that there is no actual, potential, or any kind of conflict of interest including any financial, personal, or other relationships with other individuals or organizations of the submitted manuscripts that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N5A8, Canada

    Hasan Pervej Ahmed & Jeff J. Schoenau

Authors
  1. Hasan Pervej Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeff J. Schoenau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Pervej Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, H.P., Schoenau, J.J. Effects of Biochar on Yield, Nutrient Recovery, and Soil Properties in a Canola (Brassica napus L)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) Rotation Grown under Controlled Environmental Conditions. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 1183–1196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9574-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9574-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation