Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of the damage index approach for the rapid evaluation of earthquake resistant buildings

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a promising approach to modeling the building resistance in the seismic rehabilitation process. The damage index model (DIM) can be interactively utilized into the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in order to compute parameters and to analyze data for a quality management purpose. It can perform an easy accessibility of the data to evaluate buildings for earthquake mitigation and preparedness. This research article intended to introduce a software program by using an integration system to design and to dissect the data for evaluating a building resistance against earthquakes. This paper promises a new integrated system for rapid evaluation of buildings, further a city planning by combination of GIS, civil engineering and industrial engineering upon the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) accompanied by seismic data, structure, parcel, material type, foundation, ceiling, wall, floor, the interior and the exterior. This software has been programmed based on the Damage Index (DI) algorithm that was developed by Pirasteh et al. (Int J Geoinformatics 5(4): 34–41, 2009). Later, based on the proposed algorithm or model the essential parameters have been adopted in Matrix laboratory (MATLAB) environment to yield a new software program for the meliorating earthquake mitigation and preparedness processes. This software program can identify vulnerability of the buildings ranking from 1 to 100. In addition, this paper recommends establishing a scientific procedure in determining the vulnerability of the buildings for earthquake preparedness within a GIS environment. However, this software program can amend in detecting weak structures for rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali SA, Pirasteh S (2004) Geological application of Landsat ETM for mapping structural geology and interpretation: aided by remote sensing and GIS. Int J Remote Sens 25(21):4715–4727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam M, Mahmoodzadeh A, Pirasteh S (2009) A method for rapid evaluation of masonry buildings against earthquakes. Int Disaster Adv J 2(3):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrasys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe, earthquake eng. Strua Dyn 25:371–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzangi M (1989) Continental collision zones: Sciesmotectonics and crustal structure. In: James DE (ed) In the encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Van nostrand, Rienold, New York, pp 58–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (1994) Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalog of Iran. Int Inst Earthq Eng Seismol 1:266–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian (1995) The first seismicity catalogue and the natural phenomenon of Iran, first edition; natural hazards prior to twentieth century, (IIEES), pp.17

  • Cavallaro A, Ferraro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2012) Topographic effects of the Monte Po hill in Catania (Italy). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43(2012):97–113. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.07.022, ISSN: 0267–7261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Şeşetyan K, Demircioğlu MB, Hancılar U, Zülfikar C (2011) Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:247–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhnia A, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Pourkermani M, Arian M (2011) A recent scenario of mass wasting and its impact on the transportation in Alborz Mountains, Iran: contribution from Geo information technology. Arab Geosci J 4:1337–1349. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0238-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso S, Maugeri M (2005) Vulnerability of physical environment of the city of Catania using GIS technique. Adv Earthq Eng 14:155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso S, Maugeri M (2009) The seismic microzonation of the city of Catania (Italy) for the maximum expected scenario earthquake of January 11, 1693. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:953–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso S, Maugeri M (2012) The seismic microzonation of the city of Catania (Italy) for the Etna Scenario Earthquake (M = 6.2) of 20 February 1818. Earthq Spectra (28) 2:573–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsanos EI, Sextos AG, Manolis GD (2010) Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng (30) 4:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1992) Estimate of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files, part ii, incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiti K (2001) Bhuj Earthquake Mapping Surface Features Using Remote Sensing Data., M.Tech Dissertation submitted to Department of Earth Sciences. University of Roorkee, Roorkee, p 185

    Google Scholar 

  • McClusky (2000) GPS constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco P, Santucci de Magistris F, Grasso S, Marchetti S, Maugeri M, Totani G (2011) Analysis of the liquefaction phenomena in the village of Vittorito (L’Aquila), bulletin earthquake. Eng 9:231–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Motlaq SK, Pirasteh S, Norozi OA, Pradhan B, Mahmoodzadeh A (2011) Sinkholes mapping using gis: vulnarebility and risk assessment emphasis on development areas. Int Geoinformatics Res Dev J 2(2):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirasteh S, Li J, Mollaee S (2014) satellite-based detection of compounding tectonic activities effecting on column of ozone and thermal infrared precursor to earthquake occurrence. Disaster Adv J 7(12):32–40

  • Pirasteh S, Mahmoodzadeh A, Alam M (2008) Integration of Geo information Technology and Survey Analysis for Development in Mitigation Study against Earthquake: A Case Study for Esfahan Iran, Disaster Adv J, 1(2): 20-26

  • Pirasteh S, Mahmoodzadeh A, Nikouravan B, Alam M, Asghar RSM (2009) Probabilistic methods and study earthquakes aided by geoinformatics. Int J Geoinformatics 5(4):34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadra K, Masakatsu M, Hassanzadeh R, Amiraslanzadeh R, Kamel B (2014) A GIS-based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraf AK, Mishra P, Mitra S, Sarma B, Mukhopadhyay DK (2002) Remote sensing and GIS technologies for improvements in geological structures interpretation and mapping (A Technical note). Int J Remote Sens 23(13):2527–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simac MR, Bathurst RJ, Goodrun RA (1991) Design and analysis of three reinforced soil retaining walls. Proc Geosynth 91 Atlanta GA USA 2:781–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhenzhong Z, Lanmin W (1995) Geological disasters in loess areas during the 1920 Haiyuan earthquake. China Geol J 36:269–274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saied Pirasteh.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. A. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirasteh, S., Li, J. & Attarzadeh, I. Implementation of the damage index approach for the rapid evaluation of earthquake resistant buildings. Earth Sci Inform 8, 751–758 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0204-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0204-0

Keywords

Navigation