Abstract
Why do individuals sometimes claim a decision is unfair when the decision process is considered fair by socially accepted standards? Past research on the interaction pattern between procedural and distributive justice generally supports the fair process effect, the idea that fair procedures ameliorate negative reactions to unfavorable decision outcomes. However, some research suggests that self-relevant variables play a role in altering the interaction pattern. Using elements of attribution theory, specifically external self-serving bias and self-threat, with group identification, we develop a new self-threat model of procedural justice. Specifically, we hypothesize that when individuals experience self-threat (threat to the ego or self-concept) as a result of a decision outcome, the tendency to protect the self by engaging in externalized attributions may result in lower perceptions of fairness and organizational justice regardless of whether the decision process is fair. Results indicate that group identification is negatively related to external self-serving bias, but is not significantly related to perceptions of self-threat. However, external self-serving bias and perceptions of self-threat are negatively related to perceptions of procedural justice. The results may help explain why individuals who have low group identification or who feel undervalued by society, such as minorities or people with disabilities, may be more likely to react negatively to an unfavorable outcome determined by fair procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ababneh, K. I., Hackett, R. D., & Schat, A. C. (2014). The role of attributions and fairness in understanding job applicant reactions to selection procedures and decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 111–129. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9304-y.
Adams, J. S. (1963). Wage inequities, productivity and work quality. Industrial Relations, 3, 9–16.
Aggarwal, P., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). When consumers care about being treated fairly: the interaction of relationship norms and fairness norms. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 114–127. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.009.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: the dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.5.
Blader, S. L. (2007). What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 986–994. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.022.
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603.
Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: how high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58–76. doi:10.5465/AMR.2002.5922363.
Brockner, J. (2010). A contemporary look at organizational justice: multiplying insult times injury. New York: Taylor & Francis, LLC.
Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Magner, N., Folger, R., Umphress, E., van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., Magner, M., & Siegel, P. (2003). High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: an attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 51–68. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00531-9.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189–208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 525–553). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Burton, J. P., Taylor, S. G., & Barber, L. K. (2014). Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 871–891. doi:10.1002/job.1939.
Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: a meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23.
Chen, Y., Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (2003). When is it “a pleasure to do business with you”? The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00062-1.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189–217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
De Cremer, D. (2001). Relations of self-esteem concerns, group identification, and self stereotyping to in-group favoritism. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 389–400. doi:10.1080/00224540109600560.
Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: a referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145–162). New York: Plenum Press.
Folger, R. (1993). Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirements. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 239–248. doi:10.1007/BF01419447.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of ‘voice’ and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253–2261. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2253.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91–109.
Greenberg, J. (1987). The college sophomore as Guinea pig: setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12, 157–159. doi:10.5465/AMR.1987.4306516.
Grienberger, I. V., Rutte, C. G., & van Knippenberg, A. F. M. (1997). Influence of social comparisons of outcomes and procedures on fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 913–919. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.913.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325.
Khan, A. K., Quratulain, S., & Bell, C. M. (2014). Episodic envy and counterproductive work behaviors: is more justice always good? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 128–144. doi:10.1002/job.1864.
Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1996). Causality orientations and the disappearance of the self-serving bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 76–87. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0005.
Koivisto, S., Lipponen, J., & Platow, M. (2013). Organizational and supervisory justice effects on experienced threat during change: the moderating role of leader in-group representativeness. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 595–607. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.04.002.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin & M. Lewis (Eds.), Perspectives in interactional psychology (pp. 287–327). New York: Plenum.
Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M. W. (2001). When is criticism not constructive? The role of fairness perceptions and dispositional attribution in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations, 54, 1155–1187. doi:10.1177/0018726701549002.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–239). New Jersey: General Learning Press.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.
Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 388–400. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000552.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181–223). Boston: Elsevier.
Maas, M., & van den Bos, K. (2011). Real personal uncertainty induced by means of task-related feedback: effects on reactions to voice and no-voice procedures. Social Justice Research, 24, 107–125. doi:10.1007/s11211-011-0130-y.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202.
Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., Ford, R. C., & Gundlach, M. J. (2004). Dues paying: a theoretical explication and conceptual model. Journal of Management, 30, 49–69. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.002.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving bias in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225. doi:10.1037/h0076486.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.
O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 387–405. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5.
Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: an examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 72, 308–335.
Reifenberg, R. J. (1986). The self-serving bias and the use of objective and subjective methods for measuring success and failure. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 627–631. doi:10.1080/00224545.1986.9713635.
Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64–80. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.64.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de.
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (2007). Better, stronger, faster: self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 124–141. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x.
Schroth, H. A., & Shah, P. (2000). Procedures: do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 462–471. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.462.
Silvia, P. J., & Duval, T. S. (2001). Predicting the interpersonal targets of self-serving attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 333–340. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1468.
Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: an accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286–297. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_02.
Smurda, J. D., Wittig, M. A., & Gokalp, G. (2006). Effects of threat to a valued social identity on implicit self-esteem and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 181–197. doi:10.1177/1368430206062076.
Soper, D. S. (2014). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
Tetlock, P. E., & Levin, A. (1982). Attribution bias: on the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 68–88. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90082-8.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego: Academic Press.
van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273–300). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
van den Bos, K., Bruins, J., Wilke, H. A. M., & Dronkert, E. (1999). Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: on the psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 324–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.324.
van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace (Vol. 2, pp. 49–66). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1996). The consistency rule and the voice effect: the influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgments and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 411–428. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<411::AID-EJSP766>3.0.CO;2-2.
Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265–284. doi:10.1348/014466605X52245.
Wann, D. L., & Grieve, F. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of In-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: the importance of team identification and threats to social identity. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 531–545. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.531-546.
Wang, R., & Jiang, J. (2015). How abusive supervisors influence employees’ voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 204–220. doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.990410.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lilly, J.D., Wipawayangkool, K. When Fair Procedures Don’t Work: a Self-Threat Model of Procedural Justice. Curr Psychol 37, 680–691 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9555-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9555-7