Skip to main content
Log in

And the Beat Goes On: Popular Billboard Song Beats Per Minute and Key Signatures Vary with Social and Economic Conditions

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The beats per minute and key signatures of popular Billboard songs from 1955 to 2008 were investigated along with changes in the social and economic conditions of the USA, in accordance with the Environmental Security Hypothesis. Slower pop songs and songs in less common keys are generally more reflective and serious, whereas faster pop songs and songs in common keys are generally more celebratory and fun. Consistent with theory predictions, songs with more beats per minute and in common key signatures were most popular in social and economic good times and songs with less beats per minute and in less common key signatures were most popular during social and economic bad times. Environmental conditions appear to influence tempo and key preferences of popular music.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deutsch, D. (1992). The psychology of music (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, R. A., Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). Performance of perceived beat in relation to age and music training. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. T. (2010). Authenticating identity work: country music saviors. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 35, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MixMeister (2010). MixMeister Technology, LLC. http://www.mixmeister.com/support_help_bpm1.html.

  • Nelson, L. D., Pettijohn, T. F., II, & Galak, J. (2007). Mate preferences in social cognitive context: When environmental and personal change leads to predictable cross-cultural variation. In V. Swami & A. Furnham (Eds.), Body beautiful: Evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 185–206). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, S. (2003). Musical tempo and waiting perceptions. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 685–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettijohn, T. F., II, & Sacco, D. F., Jr. (2009). Tough times, meaningful music, mature performers: popular Billboard songs and performer preferences across social and economic conditions in the USA. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettijohn, T. F., II, Williams, G. M., & Carter, T. C. (2010). Music for the seasons: seasonal music preferences in college students. Current Psychology, 29, 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitburn, J. (2001). Billboard top 1,000 singles 1955–2000. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, M., Naga, S., & Shimizu, J. (2007). Positive musical effects on two types of negative stressful conditions. Psychology of Music, 35(2), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry F. Pettijohn II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettijohn, T.F., Eastman, J.T. & Richard, K.G. And the Beat Goes On: Popular Billboard Song Beats Per Minute and Key Signatures Vary with Social and Economic Conditions. Curr Psychol 31, 313–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9149-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9149-y

Keywords

Navigation