Skip to main content
Log in

Eye color Predicts Disagreeableness in North Europeans: Support in Favor of Frost (2006)

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigates whether eye color provides a marker of Agreeableness in North Europeans. Extrapolating from Frost’s (2006) research uncovering an unusually diverse range of hair and eye color in northern Europe, we tested the hypothesis that light eyed individuals of North European descent would be less agreeable (a personality marker for competitiveness) when compared to their dark eyed counterparts, whereas there would be no such effect for people of European descent in general. The hypothesis was tested in Australia to provide consistent environmental conditions for both groups of people. Results support the hypothesis. Implications and conclusions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2005). Main countries of birth of the population. (No. 3412.0). Canberra: Australian Capital Territory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, J. F., & Dabbs, J. M. (2001). Eye color predicts alcohol use in two archival samples. Personality and Individual Difference, 31, 535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Bjorkqvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51–64). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO personality inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eron, L. D., Bjorkqvist, K., & Niemela, P. (1992). Gender differences in violence: Biology and/or socialization? In Of mice and women. Aspects of female aggression (pp. 89–97). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Manning, J. T., & Neave, N. (2004). Second to fourth digit ratio and the ‘big five’ personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. (2006). European hair and eye color: a case of frequency-dependent sexual selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gary, A. L., & Glover, J. (1976). Eye color, sex and children’s behavior. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 3, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Personality Item Pool. (2001). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from http://ipip.ori.org/.

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkley: Technical report, Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, M. (1998). Iris patterns and personality: Does a relationship exist that can be useful for the five factor model and behavioral genetics? Paper presented at Behavioral Genetics Association’s Annual Meeting in Stockholm, Sweden 1998.

  • Lippa, R. A. (2006). Finger lengths, 2D:4D ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the big five. Biological Psychology, 71, 116–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luxen, M. F., & Buunk, B. P. (2005). Second-to-fourth digit ratio related to verbal and numerical intelligence and the big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 959–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powch, I. G., & Houston, B. K. (1996). Hostility, anger-in, and cardiovascular reactivity in white women. Health Psychology, 15, 200–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. (1999). Australian population: ethnic origins. People and Place, 7, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, B. I. M. (1990). Morphological and metrical characteristics of the male and female Leitmotif in mate-selection and its impact on the selection of the spouse. Homo, 41, 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rim, Y. (1983). Eye-color, ethnic origin or family size? Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 101–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression Management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweder, B. I. M. (1994). The impact of the face on long-term human relationships. Homo, 45, 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. (1987). Sexual competition and mate choice. In B. B. Smuts et al. (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 385–399). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R. A., & Frudakis, T. N. (2004). Eye colour: portals into pigmentation genes and ancestry. TRENDS in Genetics, 20, 327–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, T. H. (1983). Minority type human mate preference. Social Biology, 30, 162–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance. Human Facial Beauty, 4, 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, M. (1999). Eye color: A key to human and animal behavior. Nebraska: Lincoln. To Excel (Original work published 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Peter Frost for his comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris J. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardiner, E., Jackson, C.J. Eye color Predicts Disagreeableness in North Europeans: Support in Favor of Frost (2006). Curr Psychol 29, 1–9 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9070-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9070-1

Keywords

Navigation