Abstract
Assessments of linguistic ability amongst inner city African American children in the 1960’s and cross-cultural assessments of problem solving skills amongst participants without formal education in several contexts around the world have both demonstrated the need for investigators to distinguish the possible existence of some form of competency from the matter of whether evidence of that competency can be elicited with a particular assessment tool. In both of the previously mentioned cases, the evidence suggests that participants had the competencies in question and failed to demonstrate them (at least partially) as a result of the nature of the assessment context. The current article takes these demonstrations of the need for culturally sensitive assessment as a point of departure, and argues that today, a further development in how competence is understood is necessary. For all its benefits, the idea of culturally sensitive assessment still relies on the problematic characterization of competencies as discrete sets of stable underlying dispositions. Current research from the dynamic systems perspective in psychology suggests that intelligent human action involves the contextual and self-organized emergence of adaptive behavioral solutions, rather than the expression of preplanned, latent competencies. An adequate conceptualization of competence must therefore account for this emergence, rather than positing competencies as hidden or latent behavioral performances.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While less relevant to the concerns of the current paper, Labov’s main conclusion is about another significant contributor to the false negative findings he critiques: the institutional and research bias against “non-standard” forms of English, such as African American Vernacular English.
Dudley-Marling and Lucas (2009) point out Hart and Risley failed to adequately consider the extent to which the deficit they observed may be a unique artifact of the recording context. In describing this context, they remark only that “parents seemed to be quite comfortable with the observer”, who was instructed to be a friendly but silent and neutral presence (Hart and Risley 1995, p. 35). The possibility that the observer might affect in-home language use, and do so differentially across different SES groups is a valid concern given prior evidence of such effects (Baum et al. 1979; Labov 1972).
References
Adolph, K. E. (2008). Learning to move. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 213–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00577.x.
Baum, C. G., Forehand, R., & Zegiob, L. E. (1979). A review of observer reactivity in adult–child interactions. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1, 167–178.
Bereiter, C. (1966). An academically oriented preschool for culturally deprived children. In F. M. Hechinger (Ed.), Pre-school education today. New York: Doubleday.
Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: impasse and solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cole, M., & Bruner, J. S. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about psychological processes. American Psychologist, 26(10), 867–876. doi:10.1037/h0032240.
Deutsch, M., & Associates (1967). The disadvantaged child. New York: Basic Books.
Deutsch, M., Katz, I., & Jensen, A. (1968). Social class, race, and psychological development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED037484.
Dixon, J. A., & Bangert, A. S. (2004). On the spontaneous discovery of a mathematical relation during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 28, 433–449.
Dixon, J. A., & Kelley, E. (2006). The probabilistic epigenesis of knowledge. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 34, pp. 323–361). New York: Academic Press.
Dixon, J. A., & Kelley, E. (2007). Theory revision and redescription: complementary processes in knowledge acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 111–115.
Dudley-Marling, C., & Lucas, K. (2009). Pathologizing the language and culture of poor children. Language Arts, 362–370.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16(2), 234–248. doi:10.1111/desc.12019.
Glick, J. 1975. Cognitive development in cross-cultural perspective. In F Horiwitz (Ed.) Review of child development research: Vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10(1), 1–11.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (2003). The early catastrophe. American Educator, 27(4), 6–9.
Jensen, A. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement. Harvard Educational Review, 39(1), 1–123.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Latash, M. L. (1996). The Bernstein problem: how does the central nervous system make its choices? In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its development (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Piaget, J. (1955). The Child’s construction of reality. London: Routledge & Paul Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=0lUVAAAAIAAJ.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.
Stephen, D., & Dixon, J. (2009). The self-Organization of Insight: entropy and power Laws in problem solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 2(1). doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1043.
Suskind, D., Kuhl, P., Leffel, K. R., Landry, S., Cunha, F., & Neckerman, K. M. (2013). Bridging the Early Language Gap: A Plan for Scaling Up. In A white paper prepared for the White House meeting on bridging the thirty-million-word gap. Retrieved from http://stagingharris.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/White%20Paper%20Suskind_Leffel_Landry_Cunha%209%2030%2020131.pdf.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: in reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9(3), 237–304.
Valsiner, J., Lyra, M., Molenaar, P., & Chaudhary, N. (2009). Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. New York: Springer.
Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–672). London: Sage.
Van Orden, G. C., Kello, C. T., & Holden, J. G. (2010). Situated behavior and the place of measurement in psychological theory. Ecological Psychology, 22(1), 24–43. doi:10.1080/10407410903493145.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science, 111(2872), 23–29. doi:10.1126/science.111.2872.23.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes, ed. and trans. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Byers, P. Developing Approaches to Competence: Away from the Metaphor of Competence as a Hidden Object. Integr. psych. behav. 51, 62–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9369-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9369-z