Skip to main content
Log in

Abduction in the Public Sphere: Sadomasochism, Surveillance, and Counterpublics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several years ago, a negotiated, consensual abduction scenario took place in downtown Toronto, Canada. Following the public abduction the captive was taken to a secure, private location and (consensually) subjected to physical and sexual aggression: ‘gang-rape’. The public abduction involved five queer and trans persons, some of whom are people of colour. In a Foucaultian context, an abduction scenario eludes surveillance and remains invisible until revealed. During the abduction scenario some citizens stopped, observed, and considered using their cellular phones, visibly concerned with what they were witnessing. At one point the scenario paused for consultation and explanation with bystanders troubled by what they interpreted as potentially criminal behaviour. This response can be understood as policing non-normative, public, physical activity. What are the limitations of Sadomasochism (S/m) in the public sphere? And how are identifications of class, ethnicity, gender, and sexuality positioned in this analysis? To those inexperienced with S/m, unfamiliar with consensually aggressive activity, there can be a questioning of psychological contiguity. In the twenty-first century there has been a mainstreaming of kink. Yet, there remain limitations of public tolerance for S/m as counter–conduct. Through the work of Warner and Munoz, this paper suggests the scenario can be interpreted as a counterpublic. This research is an autoethnographic account of the scenario and addresses the limitations on S/m scenarios conducted in the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the abbreviation S/m for Sadomasochism from this point. I capitalize ‘S’ for dominant persons, or ‘Sadists’, and lower-case ‘m’ for submissive persons, or ‘masochists’. This is a generally accepted and recognized abbreviation in the S/m community.

  2. I use the term 'sexuality' in the generally accepted, contemporary context. I am aware of Foucault's genealogical engagement with sexuality but will not undertake a complete explanation here. See Foucault (1980) interview, “The Confession of the Flesh” and Arnold Davidson (2001) The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts.

  3. I recommend Athanassoulis’ (2002) elucidation of consent in S/m practices.

  4. See Fowles (2008).

References

  • Anderson, P. (2001). Passion lost: Public sex, private desire in the twentieth century. Toronto: Thomas Allen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoulis, N. (2002). The role of consent in Sado-Masochistic practices. Res Publica, 8, 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2013). Consent is a grey area? A comparison of understandings of consent in 50 Shades of Grey and on the BDSM blogosphere. Sexualities, 16(8), 896–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. (2008). Transgressive and transformative gendered sexual practices and white privileges: The case of the dyke/trans BDSM communities. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 36(3–4), 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. (2014). Queer BDSM intimacies. Critical consent and pushing boundaries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, (2004). “Sexual rights” and “sexual responsibilities” within consensual “S/M” practice. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 195–208). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, A. (2009). The social construction of sexuality and perversion: Deconstructing Sadomasochism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bedfellows, Dangerous (Ed.). (1996). Policing public sex: Queer politics and the future of AIDS activism. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2006). Queer studies under ethnography’s sign. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12(4), 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2006). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussel, R. K. (2008). Beyond yes or no: Consent as sexual process. In J. Friedman & J. Valenti (Eds.), Yes means yes: Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape (pp. 43–51). Berkeley: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Califia, P. (1994). Public sex. The culture of radical sex. Jersey City: Cleis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church Gibson, P., & Kirkham, N. (2012). Fashionably laid: The styling of hard-core. In C. Hines & D. Kerr (Eds.), Hard to swallow: Hard-core pornography on screen (pp. 147–162). New York: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossman, B. (2007). Sexual citizens. The legal and cultural regulation of sex and belonging. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1993). Beyond racism and misogyny: Black feminism and 2 Live Crew. In M. Matsuda, C. Lawrence, R. Delgado, & K. Crenshaw (Eds.), Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment (pp. 111–132). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. (2001). The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delany, S. (1999). Times square red, Times square blue. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, L. (2007). Erotic asphyxiation and the limits of SM discourse. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on Sadomasochism (pp. 119–132). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (1993). Sexual citizenship. The material construction of sexualities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagelson, D. (2002). Perfectionist liberalism, tolerance and American law. Res Publica, 8, 40–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 19721977. C. Gordon (Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books

  • Foucault, M. (1984). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 340–372). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure. Volume 2 of the history of sexuality. Trans. R. Hurley. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France 19751976 (D. Macey Trans.). New York: Picador.

  • Foucault, M. (2001). The Hermeneutics of the subject. Lectures at the College de France. 19811982 (G. Burchell Trans.). New York: Picador.

  • Foucault, M. (2003). The essential Foucault. P. Rabinow, N. Rose (Eds.). New York, NY: The New Press.

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population (M. Senellart, Ed., G. Burchell Trans.). New York: Picador.

  • Foucault, M. (2010). The government of self and others. Lectures at the College de France, 19821983 (G. Burchell Trans.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Fowles, S. (2006). Friction burn: A nonfiction admission. In M. B. Sycamore (Ed.), Nobody passes (pp. 38–48). Emeryville: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, S. (2008). The fantasy of acceptable “non-consent”: Why the female sexual submissive scares us (and why she shouldn’t). In J. Friedman & J. Valenti (Eds.), Yes means yes: Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape (pp. 117–125). Berkeley: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. (1997). Leatherdyke boys and their daddies: How to have sex without women or men. Social Text, 52(53), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. (1998). Between the body and the flesh: Performing Sadomasochism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, L. (2009). Imagined, desired: Coming of age with queer ethnographies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 15(4), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, P. (1994). Rethinking Sadomasochism: Feminism, interpretation, and simulation. Hypatia, 9(1), 116–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdridge, D. (2006). Voices from the margins: Sadomasochism and sexual citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 10(4), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leap, W. (Ed.). (1999). Public sex/gay space. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (1979). The social organization of sexual risk. Alternative Lifestyles, 2(1), 69–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, J. (1999). Going gonzo!: The American flaneur, the eastern European on/scene, and the pleasures of implausibility. In J. Elias, V. Diehl Elias, V. L. Bullough, G. Brewer, J. J. Douglas, & W. Jarvis (Eds.), Porn 101. Eroticism, pornography, and the first amendment. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, J. (1999). Disidentifications. Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 249–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, I. (2012). Asking for it: Erotic asphyxiation and the limitations of sexual consent. Jindal Global Law Review, 4(1), 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park-Fuller, L. (2000). Performing absence: The staged personal narrative as testimony. Text and Performance Quarterly, 20, 20–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, N. (2012). Violence and the pornographic imaginary. The politics of sex, gender, and aggression in hardcore pornography. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, L. (2008). A love letter from an anti-rape activist to her feminist sex-toy store. In J. Friedman & J. Valenti (Eds.), Yes means yes: Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape (pp. 107–115). Berkeley: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinella, J. (2003). Partners in power: Living in kinky relationships. Oakland: Greenery Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, T. (2012). Friendship as a way of life. Foucault, AIDS, and the politics of shared estrangement. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H. (2004). Cynic shamelessness in late sixteenth-century French texts. The Modern Language Review, 99(3), 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D. (2000). Recording the unspeakable: Masturbation in the diary of William Drummond, 1657–1659. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 9(3), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2008). Dungeon intimacies: The poetics of transsexual Sadomasochism. Parallax, 14(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G., & Ussher, J. (2001). Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4(3), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal: Sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watney, S. (1987). Policing desire: Pornography, AIDS, and the media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M., Williams, C., & Moser, C. (1984). The social constituents of Sadomasochism. Social Problems, 31(4), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. (2006). Mainstreaming kink: The politics of BDSM representation in U.S popularmedia. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(2–3), 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. (2011a). Techniques of pleasure. BDSM and the circuits of sexuality. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. (2011b). The epistemology of ethnography: Method in queer anthropology. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly, 17(4), 649–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, E. (2009). Perverting visual pleasure: Representing Sadomasochism. Sexualities, 12(2), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woltersdorff, V. (2011). The pleasures of compliance. Domination and compromise within BDSM practice. In M. M. C. Varela, N. Dhawan, & A. Engel (Eds.), Hegemony and heteronormativity: Revisiting “The Political” in queer politics (pp. 169–188). Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Olson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest. The author has not received research Grants, speaker honorariums, and does not own stock in any company.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olson, I. Abduction in the Public Sphere: Sadomasochism, Surveillance, and Counterpublics. Sexuality & Culture 21, 795–812 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9422-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9422-1

Keywords

Navigation